Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/994,895

ASSEMBLY

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 15, 2025
Priority
Jul 26, 2022 — IT 102022000015714 +2 more
Examiner
CAJILIG, CHRISTINE T
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Fsc Technologies Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allowance Rate
723 granted / 1024 resolved
+10.6% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1044
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
71.8%
+31.8% vs TC avg
§102
7.1%
-32.9% vs TC avg
§112
13.0%
-27.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1024 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings The drawings are objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(1) because they do not include the following reference sign(s) mentioned in the description: 7 (see page 5, line 6). The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the at least a second winding (7) of tape having an extension along a plane transversal to a place on which said at least a first winding (1) extends as recited in claim 12 must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Objections Claim 3 is objected to because of the following informalities: the claim contains a typographical error in reciting “the tabs (1)” instead of the tabs (132). Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by FR2716225 to Patrice (“Patrice”). See annotated Fig. 13 of Patrice below. Regarding claim 1, Patrice in Fig. 13 discloses an assembly (10) comprising: a body (501) in turn comprising a surface (131) to be structurally reinforced and at least two tabs (132) having an extension each between a first and a second end (132a, 132b) along a line thereof away from the surface (131); said first end (132a) being connected to the surface (131); at least a first winding (1) of tape made of composite material having an extension around the body (501) so as to connect said at least two tabs (132). Regarding claim 2, Patrice discloses that said at least a first winding (1) transits at least at the second end (132b) of the tabs (132). Regarding claim 3, Patrice discloses that said at least a first winding (1) externally wraps the tabs (132). Regarding claim 4, Patrice discloses that said body (501) comprises at least in part concrete or alkali activated material or geopolymers (page 5, lines 4-6 discloses concrete). Regarding claim 5, Patrice discloses a plurality of tabs (132 of 501, 502, 503, 504) distributed along a circular trajectory, said at least a first winding (1) of tape being arranged so as to externally embrace all the tabs (132). Regarding claim 6, Patrice discloses that said at least a first winding (1) contacts the tabs (132) only at or in proximity to the second ends (132b). Regarding claim 7, Patrice discloses that said at least a first winding (1) has an extension on a plane substantially parallel to the surface (131) to be reinforced. Regarding claim 8, Patrice discloses that said at least a first winding (1) of tape has an extension such as to wrap the tabs (132) and the surface (131) to be reinforced. Regarding claim 9, Patrice discloses that said tabs (132) are at two opposite ends of the surface (131) to be reinforced. Regarding claim 10, Patrice discloses a strut (shaded portion of 501 shown in Fig. 15) interposed between the two tabs (132) at the second ends (132b), said at least a first winding (1) also wrapping said strut (shaded portion of 501 shown in Fig. 15). Regarding claim 11, Patrice discloses that said at least a first winding (1) has an extension on a plane substantially orthogonal to the surface (131) to be reinforced. Regarding claim 12, Patrice discloses at least a second winding (other 1) of tape having an extension along a plane transversal to a plane on which said at least a first winding (1) extends. Annotated Fig. 13 PNG media_image1.png 352 594 media_image1.png Greyscale Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTINE T CAJILIG whose telephone number is (571)272-8143. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Glessner can be reached at 571-272-6754. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTINE T CAJILIG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3633
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 15, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12680373
MULTI-PIECE SILL ASSEMBLY FOR FENESTRATIONS
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12668966
Modular space frame support system, work platform system and methods of erecting the same
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12662810
OFFICE POD
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12655676
TRIM RETAINER SYSTEMS AND METHODS
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12644331
GLAZED UNIT COMPRISING A PROFILED BEAD WITH A FOAMING AGENT AND A BONDED COVER PIECE AS WELL AS THE METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE GLAZED UNIT
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+15.3%)
2y 3m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1024 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month