Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/994,975

TRAY MOUNTING STRUCTURE FOR CYCLE HITCH CARRIER

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 15, 2025
Priority
Jul 15, 2022 — JP 2022-113904 +1 more
Examiner
MCNURLEN, SCOTT THOMAS
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Car Mate Mfg Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
53%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 53% of resolved cases
53%
Career Allowance Rate
438 granted / 825 resolved
-6.9% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+27.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
863
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
53.7%
+13.7% vs TC avg
§102
17.1%
-22.9% vs TC avg
§112
28.0%
-12.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 825 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 1/15/2025 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. REJECTION BASED ON PRESCOTT Claim(s) 1-2 and 4-5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US Patent 10,384,620 to Prescott. Regarding claim 1, Prescott discloses a tray mounting structure for a cycle hitch carrier that is a structure for mounting a tray to a base frame mounted to be switchable between a perpendicular position and a horizontal position (Figs. 2, 5) with a hitch base (120) disposed to horizontally extend from a vehicle rear portion serving as a base point (Fig. 2), the tray mounting structure comprising: an engaging portion (Fig. 8 – right 140) and an engaged portion (Fig. 8 – right hole in 117 receiving 140) on respective opposed surfaces of the base frame and the tray (Fig. 8); and a fastening portion (Fig. 8 – left hole in 117 receiving left 140) positioned by engaging the engaging portion with the engaged portion, wherein the engaging portion has a configuration functioning in a state where the base frame is set in the perpendicular position (the engaging portion functions when the base frame is perpendicular, and is also capable of being engaged with the engaging portion when the base frame is perpendicular), and a mounting surface of the tray in the base frame is a surface positioned in an upper side when the base frame is set in the horizontal position (Fig. 1 – top side is mounting surface that holds the bicycle). Regarding claim 2, Prescott discloses wherein the base frame is provided with a support (115 – Fig. 8) increasing a contact surface with the tray, and the engaging portion and the engaged portion, and the fastening portion are provided on the opposed surfaces between the support and the tray (Fig. 8; 140 extends from 115 into 117). Regarding claims 4-5, Prescott discloses wherein the opposed surface to the base frame on the tray is provided with a groove (116) along a longitudinal direction of a tray main body, and the engaging portion or the engaged portion, and the fastening portion are provided in a slider (117) slidable in the groove. REJECTION BASED ON WALKER Claim(s) 1-2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US Published Application 2016/0068111 to Walker. Regarding claim 1, Walker discloses a tray mounting structure for a cycle hitch carrier that is a structure for mounting a tray to a base frame mounted to be switchable between a perpendicular position and a horizontal position (Figs. 1, 14) with a hitch base (76, 80) disposed to horizontally extend from a vehicle rear portion serving as a base point, the tray mounting structure comprising: an engaging portion (right bolt 82 – Fig. 1) and an engaged portion (opening in 20 receiving bolt 82) on respective opposed surfaces of the base frame and the tray (Fig. 1); and a fastening portion (left bolt 82 – Fig. 1) positioned by engaging the engaging portion with the engaged portion, wherein the engaging portion has a configuration functioning in a state where the base frame is set in the perpendicular position (the engaging portion functions when the base frame is perpendicular, and is also capable of being engaged with the engaging portion when the base frame is perpendicular), and a mounting surface of the tray in the base frame is a surface positioned in an upper side when the base frame is set in the horizontal position (Fig. 1 – top side is mounting surface that holds the bicycle). Regarding claim 2, Walker discloses wherein the base frame is provided with a support (80) increasing a contact surface with the tray, and the engaging portion and the engaged portion, and the fastening portion are provided on the opposed surfaces between the support and the tray (Fig. 1). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Walker in view of US Patent 10,131,371 to Camarco. Regarding claim 3, Walker fails to disclose hooking in the engaging portion. However, Camarco discloses a rack attachment that includes a plurality of engaging portions (left 144 (Fig. 10), left 145 (Fig. 10), 212), engaged portions (508, 506) and fastening portion (right 145 (Fig. 10)). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill to have used Camarco’s connection to attach the tray to the support in Walker because the modification only involves a simple substitution of one known, equivalent connection for another to obtain predictable results. Further, a quick-release connection would allow for quickly changing or removing the tray as desired. In the combination, the hooks (144, 145 – Camarco) and latch bolt (212 – Camarco) would be on the tray and would engage openings in the support (80 – Walker). The combination discloses a plurality of the engaging portions (left 144 (Fig. 10), left 145 (Fig. 10) – Camarco) are disposed along an arrangement direction of the base frame when the base frame is set in the perpendicular position (144 and 145 are disposed along a length direction of the base), and engagement of an engaging portion positioned at an uppermost portion is achieved by hooking in (144 hook in as claimed), and engagement by another engaging portion is achieved by fitting in (145 and 212 fit in as claimed). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 6 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The cited references disclose configurations similar to that disclosed by applicant. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SCOTT T MCNURLEN whose telephone number is (313)446-4898. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathan Newhouse can be reached at 571-272-4544. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SCOTT T MCNURLEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3734
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 15, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12697923
GRIPPING ARM FOR A BICYCLE CARRIER WITH A RATCHETING MECHANISM
1y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12693093
Hunting and Carrying Devices, Assemblies, Systems, and Related Methods
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12679480
Wheel Carrier
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12662060
CROSS BAR ASSEMBLY AND ROOF RACK
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12660907
Multifunctional Medical Supply Receptacle and Methods of Use Thereof
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
53%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+27.7%)
2y 4m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 825 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month