Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/995,342

ANIMATION MECHANISM

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jan 16, 2025
Priority
Aug 24, 2022 — CH 000989/2022 +1 more
Examiner
WALKER, MICHAEL JAMES
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Richemont International S.A.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
30 granted / 34 resolved
+28.2% vs TC avg
Minimal -5% lift
Without
With
+-5.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
38
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
33.1%
-6.9% vs TC avg
§102
19.4%
-20.6% vs TC avg
§112
45.2%
+5.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 34 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 1-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation “ a cam follower member (31, 41) intended to cooperate with the guide groove”. The use of “intended” renders the claim indefinite as it is unclear whether the cam follower cooperates with the guide groove based on the language of the claim. For the purposes of compact prosecution, the phrase “intended to cooperate” will be examined as if amended to recite “which cooperates”. Claim 9 recites the limitation "the distance from the guide groove (22) to the axis of rotation" in ln.3. Claim 13 recites the limitations: "the bottom" and "the body" in ln. 2 "the top" in ln. 3 There is insufficient antecedent basis for these limitations in the claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 6-7, and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kaneko (JP 2534428, cited on IDS, hereinafter Kaneko). Regarding claim 1, Kaneko discloses an “Animation mechanism comprising: a cam mounted to move in rotation around an axis of rotation of the cam (4), the cam comprising a guide groove (4a), a first animation member (10) kinematically connected to the cam by a first transmission member (11), a second animation member (3) kinematically connected to the cam by a second transmission member (13), the first transmission member and the second transmission member each comprising a cam follower member intended to cooperate with the guide groove (11 and 13 cooperate with groove 4a).” Regarding claim 2, Kaneko discloses “the second animation member is kinematically connected to the first animation member (11 and 13 are connected via 4a).” Regarding claim 3, Kaneko discloses “the second animation member (3) is mounted to move in rotation with respect to the first animation member (3 moves rotationally with respect to 1).” Regarding claim 6, Kaneko discloses “the guide groove (4a) is arranged around the axis of rotation of the cam (4a surrounds the axis of rotation of 4) and wherein said cam follower member is inserted in the guide groove (11 and 13 cooperate with 4a).” Regarding claim 7, Kaneko discloses “the guide groove (4a) forms a closed curve.” Regarding claim 15, Kaneko discloses “Timepiece comprising an animation mechanism as claimed in claim 1 (the animation mechanism is for a mechanical clock).” Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-5 and 8-14 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but contain subject matter which would be allowable if incorporated into the independent claim including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: No prior art was found wherein an animation mechanism for a timepiece comprises a single rotating cam with a single inset, non-circular, and closed loop guide groove, the groove having at least one active and one inactive portion, cooperates with first and second cam followers having cooperating transmission members, and further wherein when the cam follower member of the first transmission member follows an active portion of the guide groove, the cam follower member of the second transmission member follows an inactive portion of the guide groove, and when the cam follower member of the second transmission member follows an active portion of the guide groove, the cam follower member of the first transmission member follows an inactive portion of the guide groove. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Maddocks, et al. – WO 2021188788 – Discloses an animation mechanism which uses two cam followers following internal grooves in a rotating cam. However, the device employs two closed loop guide grooves which are on opposite faces of the cam to create the animated effect. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL J WALKER whose telephone number is (571)270-7599. The examiner can normally be reached from 8:00 AM - 4:00 PM ET Monday through Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Renee Luebke can be reached at (571)272-2009. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL JAMES WALKER/Examiner, Art Unit 2831 /EDWIN A. LEON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2831
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 16, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12748382
Mechanical Watch
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12743052
ELASTIC HOLDING MEMBER FOR ATTACHING A HOROLOGICAL COMPONENT TO A SUPPORT ELEMENT
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12717283
WEARABLE COMPUTING DEVICE HAVING A BIOMETRIC SENSOR ELECTRODE POSITIONED ON A DISPLAY SCREEN COVER AND OPERABLE AS AN ANTENNA
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12710725
SPIRAL SPRING FOR A HOROLOGICAL RESONATOR MECHANISM PROVIDED WITH MEANS FOR ADJUSTING THE STIFFNESS
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12704818
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC TIMEPIECE
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (-5.1%)
2y 8m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 34 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month