Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 18/995,992

APPARATUS FOR FLOW MEASUREMENT

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Jan 17, 2025
Priority
Aug 15, 2022 — GB 2211908.5 +2 more
Examiner
BAHLS, JENNIFER E. S.
Art Unit
2853
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
BAE Systems plc
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 9m
Est. Remaining
69%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allowance Rate
348 granted / 589 resolved
-8.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
11 currently pending
Career history
600
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.3%
-31.7% vs TC avg
§103
46.4%
+6.4% vs TC avg
§102
24.6%
-15.4% vs TC avg
§112
18.4%
-21.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 589 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 12 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 12 recites the limitation "the instrumentation" in lines 2-3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. It is believed that the instrumentation is intended to be the same element as the instrumentation arm introduced in line 9 of claim 9. The claim elements should have the same name throughout the claim set. A possible correction would read - - the instrumentation arm - - . This is the interpretation that will be used in the following rejections. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2 and 4-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Liang et al. (CN 112556978 A). As to claim 1, Liang et al. teaches a rake assembly (figures 1-2) configured for measuring fluid flow parameters in a fluid flow rig (paragraph [0002]), the rake assembly comprising: a rake assembly support frame (2, 3, 11 in figures 1 and 5); a housing (1) mounted on the rake assembly support frame (figure 1), the housing (1) comprising a wall which defines a flow passage (paragraph [0036]), having a flow inlet and a flow outlet (through 2 and 3), the flow passage extending from the flow inlet to the flow outlet, wherein the housing is cylindrical and is centered on a longitudinal axis (figures 1 and 2 and paragraph [0037]); and an instrumentation arm (6), wherein the instrumentation arm extends from a leading edge end thereof to a trailing edge end thereof (figures 1 and 3), the instrumentation arm extending from the housing wall to at least partway across the flow passage (figure 2), the leading edge end being located in an Aerodynamic Instrument Plane (AIP) (paragraph [0039]); the housing (1) being rotatably mounted to the rake assembly support frame (2, 3, 11), such that the housing and instrumentation arm are operable to rotate at least partway around the longitudinal axis (rotating pipe 1 being rotated by driving mechanism 4, paragraphs [0036]-[0038]). As to claim 2, Liang et al. teaches wherein: the housing (1) comprises a bearing land (10) on its external surface that is configured to engage with the rake assembly support frame (2, 3, 11); and the support assembly (11 of 2, 3, 11) comprises a first bracket (8) and a second bracket (9) which define a support interface (figure 5), the support interface extending around the housing the support interface being configured to rotatably support the bearing land such that the housing bearing land is rotatable relative to the support interface (paragraphs [0037]-[0038]). As to claim 4, Liang et al. teaches wherein the support interface comprises a low friction surface configured for direct contact with the housing bearing land (lubricating grease in paragraph [0038]). As to claim 5, Liang et al. teaches wherein the rake assembly further comprises an actuator (4) that is coupled to the housing and operable to drive the housing around the longitudinal axis (figure 1 and paragraphs [0049] and [0051]). As to claim 6, Liang et al. teaches wherein the rake assembly further comprises a control system (control system of paragraph [0051]) that is configured to direct the actuator (4) to control a rotational speed of the housing (1) and/or control an angular location of the instrumentation arm (6; paragraph [0051]). As to claim 7, Liang et al. teaches wherein the control system (see paragraph [0051]) is configured to direct the actuator (4) to drive the housing (1) at least partway around the longitudinal axis at a constant angular speed (paragraphs [0051]-[0052] and [0060]). As to claim 8, Liang et al. teaches wherein the control system (see paragraph [0051]) is configured to direct the actuator (4) to drive the housing (1) around the longitudinal axis between a first angular position (P1) and a second angular position (P2) (paragraphs [0051]-[0052] and [0060]). As to claim 9, Liang et al. teaches a method of operating a rake assembly (figures 1-2) that is configured for measuring fluid flow parameters in a fluid flow rig (paragraphs [0002] and [0053]-[0062]), the method comprising: providing a rake assembly (figures 1-2), the rake assembly comprising: a rake assembly support frame (2, 3, 11 in figures 1 and 5); a housing (1) mounted on the rake assembly support frame (figure 1), the housing (1) comprising a wall which defines a flow passage (paragraph [0036]), having a flow inlet and a flow outlet (through 2 and 3), the flow passage extending from the flow inlet to the flow outlet, the housing being cylindrical and being centered on a longitudinal axis (figures 1 and 2 and paragraph [0037]); and an instrumentation arm (6) extending from the housing wall at least partway across the flow passage (figures 1 and 3 and paragraph [0039]); the housing (1) being rotatably mounted to the rake assembly support frame (2, 3, 11), such that the housing and instrumentation arm are operable to rotate at least partway around the longitudinal axis (rotating pipe 1 being rotated by driving mechanism 4, paragraphs [0036]-[0038]); and rotating the housing at least partway around the longitudinal axis (paragraph [0060]). As to claim 10, Liang et al. teaches wherein: the rake assembly (figure 1) further comprises: an actuator (4) coupled to the housing (1) and operable to drive the housing around the longitudinal axis (figure 1 and paragraphs [0049] and [0051]); and a control system (control system of paragraph [0051]) configured to direct the actuator (4) to control a rotational speed of the housing (1) and/or an angular location of the instrumentation arm (6; paragraph [0051]); and the method further comprises causing the control system to direct the actuator to rotate the rake assembly support frame partway around the longitudinal axis between a first angular position (P1) and a second angular position (P2) (paragraphs [0051]-[0052] and [0060]). As to claim 11, Liang et al. teaches wherein rotating the housing (1) at least partway around the longitudinal axis comprises the steps of: positioning the housing (1), and hence the instrumentation arm (6), at the first angular position (P1) (the housing has a position in steps 1-6, paragraphs [0053]-[0059]); delivering a fluid flow to the flow inlet of the flow passage (paragraph [0058]); rotating the housing at least partway around the longitudinal axis, such that the instrumentation arm is at the second angular position (P2) (paragraph [0060]); and measuring properties of the fluid flow using the instrumentation arm at the second angular position (P2) (paragraph [0060]). As to claim 12, Liang et al. teaches further comprising-positioning the housing (1), and hence the instrumentation, without delivering any fluid flow to the flow inlet of the flow passage (paragraphs [0054]-[0062] where it is considered that the initial positioning occurs before the flow is started and the different wind speeds of step 9 could comprise no fluid flow). As to claim 13, Liang et al. teaches further comprising delivering a fluid flow to the flow inlet of the flow passage while the housing (1) is being rotated around the longitudinal axis (paragraphs [0059]-[0060], where the flow is continued from step 6 to step 7). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Liang et al. (CN 112556978 A) in view of Bahadur et al. (US PGPub 2021/0102824 A1). As to claim 3, Liang et al. teaches all of the limitations of the claimed invention as noted above for claim 2, except wherein the support interface comprises a rotatable bearing. Bahadur et al. teaches wherein the support interface (figure 4) comprises a rotatable bearing (78; paragraph [0027]). It would have been obvious to one skilled in the art to one skilled in the art before the effective filing date to modify Liang et al. to have wherein the support interface comprises a rotatable bearing as taught by Bahadur et al. because it is a well known arrangement to reduce friction further reducing wear (paragraph [0027]) with predictable results. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Stults et al. (US PGPub 2021/0278192 A1) and Pickl et al. (US PGPub 2019/0234830 A1) teach systems with similarities to the disclosed invention. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JENNIFER E S BAHLS whose telephone number is (571)270-7807. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 9:00 am-3:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Stephen Meier can be reached at (571) 272-2149. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JENNIFER BAHLS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2853
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 17, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12768642
COORDINATE MEASURING SYSTEM
3y 10m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12768671
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-ENABLED IMU CALIBRATION AND SENSOR FUSION
3y 1m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12747542
SYSTEM FOR WORKING ON A TRACK
3y 12m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12748013
LIFETIME ESTIMATION SYSTEM FOR WORKING MACHINE
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12748419
LIFE DETERMINING DEVICE AND LIFE DETERMINING METHOD
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
69%
With Interview (+10.1%)
3y 6m (~1y 9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 589 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month