Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/996,373

Joined V-Belt and Manufacturing Method Therefor

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 17, 2025
Examiner
LIU, HENRY Y
Art Unit
3654
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Mitsuboshi Belting Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
997 granted / 1315 resolved
+23.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
1334
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
49.8%
+9.8% vs TC avg
§102
31.9%
-8.1% vs TC avg
§112
13.2%
-26.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1315 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION This is the first action on the merits for application 18/996373. Claims 1-8 are currently pending in this application. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of papers submitted under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d), which papers have been placed of record in the file. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over YOKOYAMA (JP 2022-085864 A) in view of TSUJI (JP 2020-051617 A) and TAKAMI (4,773,895). Regarding Claim 1, YOKOYAMA teaches A joined V-belt comprising: a plurality of wrapped V-belt portions (V); and a tie band (1)(3), wherein outer peripheral surfaces of the wrapped V-belt portions are connected by the tie band, each of the wrapped V-belt portions comprises a belt body and a cover fabric (8) covering an outer surface of the belt body, the belt body comprises a tension member layer (6) comprising a tension member (5), a tension rubber layer (4) laminated on a belt outer peripheral side of the tension member layer (6), and a compression rubber layer (7) laminated on a belt inner peripheral side of the tension member layer (6), YOKOYAMA does not teach the tie band comprises a short fiber-containing rubber layer in which a short fiber is oriented in a belt width direction, and the short fiber-containing rubber layer comprises a plurality of rib portions extending in a belt longitudinal direction. TSUJI teaches the tie band (102) comprises a short fiber-containing rubber layer (102a) in which a short fiber is oriented in a belt width direction. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to change the belt in YOKOYAMA to have the short fiber rubber layer in TSUJI to increase the stiffness of the belt in the width direction. TAKAMI teaches the tie band rubber layer (13) comprises a plurality of rib portions (16) extending in a belt longitudinal direction. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to change the belt in YOKOYAMA as modified to have the rib portions in TAKAMI to increase the friction between the back of the belt and a pulley. Regarding Claim 2, YOKOYAMA as modified teaches wherein an arrangement pitch of the rib portions (TAKAMI 16) is smaller than an arrangement pitch of the wrapped V-belt portions (TAKAMI 14). Regarding Claim 3, YOKOYAMA as modified teaches wherein an arrangement pitch of the rib portions (TAKAMI 16) is larger than a width of a gap between adjacent wrapped V-belt portions (TAKAMI 14). Regarding Claim 4, YOKOYAMA as modified teaches wherein the tie band comprises the short fiber-containing rubber layer and a fabric layer, and the fabric layer comprises a fibrous structure laminated on an inner peripheral surface of the short fiber-containing rubber layer [0047]-[0060]. Regarding Claim 5, YOKOYAMA as modified teaches wherein the fibrous structure is a cord fabric comprising a plurality of first threads extending in a belt width direction and a plurality of second threads extending in a direction intersecting the belt width direction, and an arrangement density of the second threads is lower than an arrangement density of the first threads [0047]-[0060]. Regarding Claim 6, YOKOYAMA as modified teaches wherein a center of a top portion of the rib portions (TAKAMI 16) is located at a gap between adjacent wrapped V-belt portions (Fig. 2). Regarding Claim 7, YOKOYAMA as modified teaches wherein a thickness of the tie band (TAKAMI 13)(Fig. 2) is 0.3 to 0.7 times a thickness of the wrapped V-belt portions. Regarding Claim 8, YOKOYAMA as modified teaches the method comprising: connecting a plurality of wrapped V-belt portion precursors by a tie band precursor; crosslinking and molding the connected wrapped V-belt portion precursors and tie band precursor by heating and pressurizing to obtain a crosslinked molded body; and forming rib portions on an outer peripheral side of the crosslinked molded body [0203][0206](TAKAMI Col. 3 lines 5-10). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HENRY Y LIU whose telephone number is (571)270-7018. The examiner can normally be reached 9-5:30 ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, MICHAEL MANSEN can be reached at 5712726608. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. HENRY Y. LIU Examiner Art Unit 3654 /HENRY Y LIU/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3654
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 17, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595829
SHIM FOR A VEHICLE BRAKE PAD HAVING HEAT DISSIPATION PORTIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595023
BICYCLE DERAILLEUR AND CHARGING CABLE FOR BICYCLE DERAILLEUR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595839
TIMING BELT TENSIONER FOR 3D PRINTER AND 3D PRINTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589411
SYSTEMS FOR ABSORBING FLEXURAL WAVES ACTING UPON A STRUCTURE USING MONOPOLE AND DIPOLE RESONANCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589723
SHEAR-TO-TORQUE GUIDE PIN ASSEMBLY FOR HEAVY-DUTY VEHICLES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+12.6%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1315 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month