Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/997,496

COATING COMPOSITION AND IN-MOLD COATING METHOD

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 21, 2025
Priority
Jul 22, 2022 — JP 2022-116863 +1 more
Examiner
SCHATZ, CHRISTOPHER T
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Kansai Paint Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
511 granted / 821 resolved
+2.2% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+26.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
855
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
48.3%
+8.3% vs TC avg
§102
16.9%
-23.1% vs TC avg
§112
31.6%
-8.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 821 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 1-4, in the reply filed on 7/6/26 is acknowledged. Claims 5-7 withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Specification The specification identifies several Trademark names used in commerce, The term should be accompanied by the generic terminology; furthermore each letter of the term should be capitalized wherever it appears or, where appropriate, include a proper symbol indicating use in commerce such as ™, SM , or ® following the term See MPEP 608.01(v). Although the use of trade names and marks used in commerce (i.e., trademarks, service marks, certification marks, and collective marks) are permissible in patent applications, the proprietary nature of the marks should be respected and every effort made to prevent their use in any manner which might adversely affect their validity as commercial marks. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Okada et al. (WO 2021159300A1). As to claim 1, Okada discloses a coating composition (para 15), comprising (A) an isocyanate-reactive group- containing compound (para 30-35, para 8-12), (B) a polyisocyanate compound (para 19-25), and (C) a carbodiimide group-containing compound and having a solid content concentration of 90 mass% or greater (para 56). As to claims 2-3 Okada discloses the carbodiimide group-containing compound (C) has an isocyanate group and an aromatic ring structure (para 56, carbodiimide disclosed - CARBODILITE V-05 – same as disclosed by applicant having isocyanate and aromatic ring, para 119-121 of Publication). When the claimed composition and prior art composition are identical or substantially identical, a case of anticipation exists. MPEP 2112. As to claim 4, Okada discloses a number average molecular weight of the carbodiimide group-containing compound (C) is within a range of 500 to 5000 (para 55). See MPEP 2131.03 and 2144.05. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Sanson et al. US 2020/0377758, drawn to an isocyanate carbodiimide coating composition. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER T SCHATZ whose telephone number is (571)272-6038. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday, 9-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Orlando can be reached at 571-270-5038. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER T SCHATZ/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1746
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 21, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12692191
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING ANNULAR GLASS SUBSTRATE, ANNULAR GLASS SUBSTRATE, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING GLASS SUBSTRATE FOR MAGNETIC DISC
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12689003
FILM DEPOSITION APPARATUS
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12686487
METHOD FOR APPLYING A COVER TO AN AIRCRAFT WING AND AIRCRAFT WING OBTAINED BY SAID METHOD
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12679049
COMPOSITE MANUFACTURING METHOD AND TOOL
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679050
Vacuum Bag Sealing System
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+26.6%)
3y 7m (~2y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 821 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month