Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/997,931

Data Sending Method, Device, and System, Storage Medium and Electronic Device

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 23, 2025
Priority
Aug 01, 2022 — CN 202210920313.3 +1 more
Examiner
VU, VIET D
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
ZTE Corporation
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
895 granted / 1065 resolved
+24.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
1085
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.6%
-33.4% vs TC avg
§103
71.2%
+31.2% vs TC avg
§102
9.5%
-30.5% vs TC avg
§112
11.0%
-29.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1065 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Art Rejection 1. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. 2. Claims 1, 4-5, 13-14 and 17-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over DeLuca, U.S. pat. Appl. Pub. No. 2022/0188440. Per claim 1, DeLuca discloses a data sending method performed by a physical entity (or physical twin) comprising: a) receiving a data initial request sent by a digital twin according to a current service requirement, wherein the data initial request comprises at least a data type of data required by the digital twin, wherein the digital twin is modeled by the physical twin (see par 0025); b) determining whether a first physical entity supports content/object indicated by the initial data request, i.e., identifying one or more additional entities (and corresponding access requirements) in the physical network that support content/object indicated by the initial data request (see par 0046); c) when the digital twin and physical twin is found to support the initial request, sending an satisfaction/success message to the digital twin network (see par 0034), and sending the required data to the digital twin according to content indicated by the initial data request (see par 0057). DeLuca does not explicitly teach that digital twin and physical twin to be digital twin network and physical twin network respectively. DeLuca however teaches that digital twin and physical twin can include any entities/objects including a network (see 0037). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to recognize such use of digital twin network and physical twin network in practicing DeLuca invention (see par 0037). It would have been obvious to one skilled in the art to recognize that the action would have included informing the subscriber of the error to prevent the subscriber from attempting to send more request to the server (see par 0045). Per claim 4, DeLuca teaches when the physical entity does not support the content indicated by the initial request or the request does not meet all access requirements, sending a request failure (i.e., deny) message to the requestor (see par 0046, 0057). Per claim 5, DeLuca also teaches enabling the system to receive a data change request after the initial request is denied, e.g., request data that user has permission to access or supply new permission to access the data (see par 0057). Claims 13-14 and 17-18 are similar in scope as that of claims 1 and 4-5. 3. Claims 8-9 and 21-22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over DeLuca and further in view of Stewart, U.S. pat. Appl. Pub. No. 2008/0320144. DeLuca does not teach receiving a data termination request or a configuration termination request sent by the subscriber and in response to such request, instructing the physical entity/network to stop sending data to the digital twin. However, Stewart discloses a method for managing physical resources, wherein upon receiving a data termination request, instructing the physical resources stop sending data to the subscriber (see Stewart par 0056). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify DeLuca with Stewart teaching because it would have enabled more efficient use of resources (see Stewart par 0056). Allowable Subject Matter 4. Claims 2-3, 6-7, 10, 15-16 and 19-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Amendment 5. Applicants' arguments filed July 23, 2026 with respect to claims 1, 4-5, 8-9, 13-14, 17-18 and 21-22 have been fully considered but are moot in view of new grounds of rejection set forth above. 6. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Viet Vu whose telephone number is 571-272-3977. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday through Thursday from 8:00am to 6:00pm. The Group general information number is 571-272-2400. The Group fax number is 571-273-8300. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Emmanuel Moise, can be reached at 571-272-3865. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /Viet D Vu/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2455 8/3/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 23, 2025
Application Filed
May 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 23, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12737273
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR GENERATING A PATH CONTAINING A USER ENGAGEMENT TARGET
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12730939
THREAT DETECTION USING A MEASURED STORAGE DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12717950
INHERITANCE-BASED ACCESS RIGHTS GOVERNANCE
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12705186
TECHNIQUES AND DEVICES FOR CONFIGURABLE MEMORY ENCRYPTION AND AUTHENTICATION
1y 12m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12695660
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTONOMOUS POLICY CONFLICT DETECTION AND MITIGATION IN OPEN RADIO ACCESS NETWORK (O-RAN) DEPLOYMENTS
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+14.1%)
2y 7m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1065 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month