Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/999,278

MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR CASINO ITEMS

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Dec 23, 2024
Priority
Jul 29, 2020 — JP 2020-128081 +2 more
Examiner
LANEAU, RONALD
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Angel Group Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
1339 granted / 1520 resolved
+18.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1560
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
35.3%
-4.7% vs TC avg
§103
18.8%
-21.2% vs TC avg
§102
17.2%
-22.8% vs TC avg
§112
9.7%
-30.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1520 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Preliminary Amendment Claims 1-55 were canceled in the preliminary amendment received on 11/24/25, claims 56-97 were added and are now pending. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on March 01, 2021 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Applicant should note that the large number of references in the attached IDS have been considered by the examiner in the same manner as other documents in Office search files are considered by the examiner while conducting a search of the prior art in a proper field of search. See MPEP 609.05(b). Applicant is requested to point out any particular references in the IDS which they believe may be of particular relevance to the instant claimed invention in response to this office action. Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claims 56-97 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claims 1-6 of prior U.S. Patent No. 18/016,731. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. US Application Number: 18/999,278 US Application Number: 18/016,731 A management system for casino items equipped with RFID tags, the management system comprising: A management system for casino items equipped with RFID tags, the management system comprising: an RFID reading device configured to read a part of or the whole of information from the RFID tag of the casino item that exist within the reading range; and an RFID reading device configured to read a part of or the whole of information from the RFID tag of the casino item that exist within the reading range; and a control device configured to control the RFID reading device, a control device configured to control the RFID reading device, wherein the control device is configured to cause the RFID reading device to repeatedly perform a first reading to read first information that is a part of the information stored in the RFID tag, and when new first information is read in the first reading, cause the RFID reading device to perform a second reading to read the whole information stored in the RFID tag. wherein the control device is configured to cause the RFID reading device to repeatedly perform a first reading to read first information that is a part of the information stored in the RFID tag, and when new first information is read in the first reading, cause the RFID reading device to perform a second reading to read the whole information stored in the RFID tag. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See references cited on PTO form 892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RONALD LANEAU whose telephone number is (571)272-6784. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon-Thu 6-4:30 ET. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Peter Vasat can be reached on 571-270-7625. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. PNG media_image1.png 275 275 media_image1.png Greyscale /Ronald Laneau/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 23, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 24, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12770458
RECORDING MEDIUM AND INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12770453
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MODIFYING THE CONFIGURATION OF EXISTING GAMING MACHINES
2y 4m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12770036
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ANNOTATION THROUGH GAMIFICATION
2y 0m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12762924
DIGITAL ASSETS FOR CONFIGURATION OF AN ELECTRONIC GAMING MACHINE
3y 0m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12758869
REDUCING LATENCY IN NETWORKED GAMING BY REDUCING I-FRAME SIZES
3y 0m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+10.0%)
2y 1m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1520 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month