Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/999,402

VEHICLE LOWER PART STRUCTURE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 23, 2024
Priority
Apr 10, 2024 — JP 2024-063654
Examiner
ZHUO, WENWEI
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Toyota Motor Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
228 granted / 288 resolved
+19.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
309
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
51.3%
+11.3% vs TC avg
§102
22.0%
-18.0% vs TC avg
§112
24.1%
-15.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 288 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1-5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yi et al. (US 20240123811 A1) in view of Zannier (US 20170072884 A1). Regarding claim 1, Yi discloses a vehicle lower part structure (Yi, Fig. 3), comprising: a rocker (Yi, 110 in Fig. 3) located outward in a vehicle width direction (Yi, Fig. 3, left-right direction) and extending in a vehicle front-rear direction (Yi, Fig. 2); a shock absorbing portion (Yi, 140 in Fig. 3) composed of a plurality of energy absorbing portions (Yi, 141 in Fig. 3) arranged in the vehicle width direction in the rocker; and a battery (Yi, 220 in Fig. 3) disposed in a lower part of a vehicle (Yi, Fig. 3), wherein a part of the shock absorbing portion that is located outward in the vehicle width direction of a fastening portion and a part of the shock absorbing portion that is located inward in the vehicle width direction of the fastening portion (Yi, see annotated Fig. 3), the fastening portion being a portion where the battery is fastened to the rocker (Yi, see annotated Fig. 3 and paragraph 91, fastened by a fastener). PNG media_image1.png 591 924 media_image1.png Greyscale Figure 1 Annotated Fig. 3 from Yi Yi fails to disclose a vehicle cabin and lower rigidity. Zannier teaches a vehicle cabin (Zannier, 99 in Fig. 1) and lower rigidity (Zannier, paragraph 70, greater thickness towards the rear or inward, therefore means lower rigidity for the outward shock absorbing portion). Zannier is considered to be analogous art because it is in the same field of vehicle rocker with energy absorbing structures as Yi. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the earliest effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the structure as taught by Yi to incorporate the teachings of Zannier with a reasonable expectation of success and vary the thickness such that the outer portion has lower rigidity than the inner portion. Doing so provides a safe space for occupants during vehicle travel and allows progressive deformation to absorb impact and reduce damage to the internal parts (Zannier, paragraph 7-8). Regarding claim 2, the combination of Yi in view of Zannier teaches the vehicle lower part structure according to claim 1, wherein the shock absorbing portion includes an outer shock absorbing portion (Yi, see annotated Fig. 3) located in an outer side in the vehicle width direction of the rocker, and an inner shock absorbing portion (Yi, see annotated Fig. 3) located inward in the vehicle width direction of the outer shock absorbing portion. Regarding claim 3, the combination of Yi in view of Zannier teaches the vehicle lower part structure according to claim 2, wherein the outer shock absorbing portion and the inner shock absorbing portion are provided as a single-piece member (Yi, Fig. 3 shows it is a single piece; Zannier Fig. 10-12 also shows single piece). Regarding claim 4, the combination of Yi in view of Zannier teaches the vehicle lower part structure according to claim 1, wherein the shock absorbing portion is composed of a plurality of members (Yi, see annotated Fig. 3, inner portion and outer portions; Zannier paragraph 70 also teaches different portions) having different rigidities (Zannier, paragraph 70, due to varying thicknesses), and the members are integrated by being coupled to each other (Yi, Fig. 3, and Zannier Fig. 10-12 also shows different members coupled together forming the shock absorbing portion). Regarding claim 5, the combination of Yi in view of Zannier teaches the vehicle lower part structure according to claim 1, wherein the fastening portion is located on a lower wall of the rocker (Yi, see annotated Fig. 3). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The cited references that are not relied upon all disclose vehicle rockers with energy absorbing structures. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Wenwei Zhuo whose telephone number is (571)272-5564. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday 8 a.m. - 4 p.m. EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Vivek Koppikar can be reached at (571) 272-5109. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WENWEI ZHUO/Examiner, Art Unit 3612
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 23, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12709138
STORAGE COMPARTMENT DOOR ASSEMBLY WITH PERIMETRAL HINGE ASSEMBLY
3y 7m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12703435
TAILGATE SUBASSEMBLY PRESETTING METHOD AND TAILGATE ASSEMBLY HAVING PRESET SUBASSEMBLIES
3y 3m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12703442
VORTEX GENERATOR FOR A VEHICLE
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12686319
TARPING ASSEMBLY AND METHODS OF TARPING A LOAD TRANSPORTER
1y 7m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12679258
LAWN CARE VEHICLE WITH IMPROVED SEAT ISOLATION
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+7.2%)
2y 5m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 288 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month