Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/999,417

EASY START CANNULATED BONE SCREW

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 23, 2024
Priority
Oct 09, 2017 — provisional 62/569,770 +5 more
Examiner
CHANG, OLIVIA C
Art Unit
3775
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Conmed Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
621 granted / 736 resolved
+14.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
762
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
36.0%
-4.0% vs TC avg
§102
33.4%
-6.6% vs TC avg
§112
27.2%
-12.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 736 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 10-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 10 and 15 recite the limitation "wherein the introducer has a diameter which is less than a diameter of the tapered tip." However, at the transition point between the tapered tip and the introducer, the diameter is the same. Therefore, it is unclear how the introducer has a diameter which is less than a diameter of the tapered Examiner recommends amending to "wherein the introducer has a diameter which is less than a greatest diameter of the tapered or similar. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 10-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph, as stated above, but would be allowable if rewritten to correct the indefiniteness. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Huebner (US 2013/0211468) discloses a surgical screw (10, 110, 710, FIGS. 1, 10, 20), comprising: a cannulated body (16) having a proximal end (20, 120) and a distal end (18, 118), the distal end having a tapered tip (24, 124, 624, 141); a plurality of threads (122 at leading end, 122 at trailing end, FIG. 10) positioned around at least a portion of the exterior of the cannulated body; an introducer (742, 161) extending distally from the tapered tip; wherein the introducer has a diameter which is less than a greatest diameter of the tapered tip (FIG. 20); and a channel (34, 134) extending through the body from the proximal end to the distal end. However, the prior art, alone or in combination, fails to disclose wherein the plurality of threads includes a primary external thread and a secondary external thread both positioned around at least the tapered tip region, and wherein the primary external thread extends around the whole of the tapered tip region to the distal end of the tapered tip region. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OLIVIA C CHANG whose telephone number is (571) 270-5017. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 7:30AM-5:00PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, please contact the examiner’s supervisor, KEVIN TRUONG, at (571) 272-4705. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571 -273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, seehttp://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /OLIVIA C CHANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3775
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 23, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12740815
VARIABLE FIXATION BONE PLATES
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12728165
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TREATING BONE FRACTURES, AND/OR FOR FORTIFYING AND/OR AUGMENTING BONE, INCLUDING THE PROVISION AND USE OF COMPOSITE IMPLANTS, AND NOVEL COMPOSITE STRUCTURES WHICH MAY BE USED FOR MEDICAL AND NON-MEDICAL APPLICATIONS
5y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12727754
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR UPGRADABLE VIDEO MEDICAL DEVICE SYSTEM
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12708418
ORTHOPEDIC BONE SCREW
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12708416
SURGICAL BONE SCREW METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+13.3%)
2y 10m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 736 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month