Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/000,104

DISPLAY DEVICE HAVING A CONTROLLABLE BACKLIGHT

Final Rejection §103§112
Filed
Dec 23, 2024
Examiner
CRAWLEY, KEITH L
Art Unit
2626
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Panasonic Automotive Systems Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allow Rate
340 granted / 577 resolved
-3.1% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
604
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§103
53.6%
+13.6% vs TC avg
§102
20.5%
-19.5% vs TC avg
§112
19.9%
-20.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 577 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 In light of the amendment filed 11/11/25, the rejection of claims 6 and 11 under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) is withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-6, 8-9, and 11-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Aurongzeb et al. (US 2020/0160813) in view of Sako et al. (US 2018/0166002). Regarding claim 1, Aurongzeb discloses a display device, comprising: a display panel that displays a first image in a first image region in a display region (abstract, figs. 2-3, ¶ 22, ¶ 48-50); a backlight that is located behind the display panel and illuminates the display panel (figs. 2-3, ¶ 22, ¶ 40, ¶ 48-50); an illuminance sensor that detects illuminance of incident light (figs. 2-3, ¶ 15, ¶ 22, ambient light detector, ¶ 41-42, ¶ 48-50); and a control circuit that controls the backlight based on the illuminance (figs. 1-2, ¶ 15, ¶ 19-22, ¶ 41-42, ¶ 51-55, ALS control thresholds disclosed; see also figs. 4-6), and a first threshold (figs. 1-2, ¶ 15, ¶ 19-22, ¶ 41-42, ¶ 51-55, ALS control thresholds disclosed; see also figs. 4-6). Aurongzeb fails to explicitly disclose wherein the display region includes a non-display region surrounding the first image region, wherein the backlight comprises a plurality of light sources arranged in a matrix, wherein the plurality of light sources include a first light source group constituted by at least one light source that overlaps the first image region when observed from a normal direction of the display panel, and a first peripheral light source group constituted by at least one light source located on the periphery of the first light source group, wherein when observed from a normal direction of the display panel, the entirety of the first peripheral light source group: does not overlap the first image region, and overlaps the non-display region, and wherein the first peripheral light source group comprises a first group constituted by: a pair of light sources respectively adjacent on the left and right sides of the first light source group; and a pair of light sources respectively adjacent above and below the first light source group, wherein the control circuit: allows the backlight to turn on the first light source group when the illuminance is less than a first threshold, which is a predetermined value; and allows the backlight to turn on the first light source group and the first group, when the illuminance is greater than or equal to the first threshold. Sako teaches wherein the display region includes a non-display region surrounding the first image region (figs. 4-11, ¶ 49-59, required luminance obtained on a block-by-block basis; each of the light sources can be changed in luminance within a range from a first upper limit luminance MAX to the minimum luminance LIGHT-OFF, e.g., see fig. 10, two dimensional array disclosed; minimum luminance LIGHT-OFF considered a “non-display region”), wherein the backlight comprises a plurality of light sources arranged in a matrix, wherein the plurality of light sources include a first light source group constituted by at least one light source that overlaps the first image region when observed from a normal direction of the display panel (figs. 1-3, ¶ 47-51; see also figs. 4-10, e.g., group h=1; see also ¶ 3-4), and a first peripheral light source group constituted by at least one light source located on the periphery of the first light source group (figs. 1-3, ¶ 47-51; see also figs. 4-10, e.g., groups h=0, h=2, v=0, v=2), wherein when observed from a normal direction of the display panel, the entirety of the first peripheral light source group: does not overlap the first image region, and overlaps the non-display region (figs. 1-3, ¶ 47-51; see also figs. 4-10, e.g., groups h=0, h=2, v=0, v=2), and wherein the first peripheral light source group comprises a first group constituted by: a pair of light sources respectively adjacent on the left and right sides of the first light source group (figs. 1-3, ¶ 47-51; see also figs. 4-10, e.g., groups h=0, h=2); and a pair of light sources respectively adjacent above and below the first light source group (figs. 1-3, ¶ 47-51; see also figs. 4-10, e.g., groups v=0, v=2), wherein the control circuit: allows the backlight to turn on the first light source group when the illuminance is less than a first threshold, which is a predetermined value (figs. 4-11, ¶ 49-59, required luminance obtained on a block-by-block basis; each of the light sources can be changed in luminance within a range from a first upper limit luminance MAX to the minimum luminance LIGHT-OFF, e.g., h=1); and allows the backlight to turn on the first light source group and the first group, when the illuminance is greater than or equal to the first threshold (figs. 4-11, ¶ 49-59, lighting amount is corrected when required luminance is not met by the luminance distribution, correction performed within the range up to the second upper limit luminance LIMIT, e.g., see h=1; lighting amount of adjacent light source, e.g., h=2, is increased to ensure required luminance, see fig. 9; see also ¶ 81-85). Aurongzeb and Sako are both directed to local dimming backlight control for display devices. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the device of Aurongzeb with the light source correction of Sako since such a modification reduces power consumption and increases lifetime of the light source (Sako, ¶ 50) and enables output with higher display quality (Sako, ¶ 5). Regarding claim 2, Sako further teaches wherein the control circuit: allows the backlight to turn on the first light source group at a luminance that is higher as the illuminance is greater and that is less than a predetermined luminance, when the illuminance is less than the first threshold (figs. 4-11, ¶ 49-59, required luminance obtained on a block-by-block basis; each of the light sources can be changed in luminance within a range from a first upper limit luminance MAX to the minimum luminance LIGHT-OFF, e.g., h=1); and allows the backlight to turn on the first light source group at the predetermined luminance when the illuminance is greater than or equal to the first threshold (figs. 4-11, ¶ 49-59, lighting amount is corrected when required luminance is not met by the luminance distribution, correction performed within the range up to the second upper limit luminance LIMIT, e.g., see h=1, see fig. 9). Regarding claim 3, Sako further teaches wherein the control circuit allows the backlight to turn on the first group at a luminance that is higher as the illuminance is greater, when the illuminance is greater than or equal to the first threshold (figs. 4-11, ¶ 49-59, lighting amount is corrected when required luminance is not met by the luminance distribution; lighting amount of adjacent light source, e.g., h=2, is increased to ensure required luminance, see fig. 9; see also ¶ 81-85). Regarding claim 4, Aurongzeb discloses first and second thresholds (figs. 1-2, ¶ 15, ¶ 19-22, ¶ 41-42, ¶ 51-55, ALS control thresholds disclosed; see also figs. 4-6). Sako further teaches wherein the first peripheral light source group further comprises a second group that is different from the first group and constituted by four light sources located diagonally adjacent to the first light source group (figs. 1-3, ¶ 47-51; see also figs. 4-10, e.g., intersection of groups h=0, h=2, v=0, and v=2), and wherein the control circuit: allows the backlight to turn on the first light source group and the first group, when the illuminance is greater than or equal to the first threshold and less than a second threshold, which is greater than the first threshold (figs. 4-11, ¶ 49-59, required luminance obtained on a block-by-block basis; each of the light sources can be changed in luminance within a range from a first upper limit luminance MAX to the minimum luminance LIGHT-OFF, e.g., h=0 and h=1); and allows the backlight to turn on the first light source group, the first group, and the second group, when the illuminance is greater than or equal to the second threshold (figs. 4-11, ¶ 49-59, lighting amount is corrected when required luminance is not met by the luminance distribution, correction performed within the range up to the second upper limit luminance LIMIT, e.g., see h=1 and h=0; lighting amount of adjacent light source, e.g., h=2, is increased to ensure required luminance, see fig. 9; see also ¶ 81-85). Regarding claim 5, Aurongzeb discloses an importance level of the first image is less than an importance threshold; and the importance level of the first image is greater than or equal to the importance threshold (¶ 14, brightness levels changed depending on content, e.g., to provide improved contrast ratios for some display content while other content does not need as stark contrast ratios; see also ¶ 48-49, ¶ 64). Sako teaches wherein the first peripheral light source group comprises a first sub-light source group constituted by at least one light source (figs. 1-3, ¶ 47-51; see also figs. 4-10, e.g., group h=0), and a second sub-light source group that is different from the first sub-light source group and constituted by at least one light source (figs. 1-3, ¶ 47-51; see also figs. 4-10, e.g., group h=2), and wherein the control circuit: allows the backlight to turn on the first light source group and the first sub-light source group, when an importance level of the first image is less than an importance threshold and when the illuminance is greater than or equal to the first threshold (figs. 4-11, ¶ 49-59, required luminance obtained on a block-by-block basis; each of the light sources can be changed in luminance within a range from a first upper limit luminance MAX to the minimum luminance LIGHT-OFF, e.g., h=0 and h=1); and allows the backlight to turn on the first light source group, the first sub-light source group, and the second sub-light source group, when the importance level of the first image is greater than or equal to the importance threshold and when the illuminance is greater than or equal to the first threshold (figs. 4-11, ¶ 49-59, lighting amount is corrected when required luminance is not met by the luminance distribution, correction performed within the range up to the second upper limit luminance LIMIT, e.g., see h=1 and h=0; lighting amount of adjacent light source, e.g., h=2, is increased to ensure required luminance, see fig. 9; see also ¶ 81-85). Regarding claim 6, Aurongzeb discloses the importance level of the first image is less than the importance threshold; and the importance level of the first image is greater than or equal to the importance threshold (¶ 14, brightness levels changed depending on content, e.g., to provide improved contrast ratios for some display content while other content does not need as stark contrast ratios; see also ¶ 48-49, ¶ 64). Sako further teaches wherein the control circuit: allows the backlight to turn on the first light source group at a maximum luminance and also turn on the at least one light source of the first peripheral light source group at a luminance that is higher as the illuminance is greater, when an importance level of the first image is less than an importance threshold and when the illuminance is greater than or equal to the first threshold (figs. 4-11, ¶ 49-59, required luminance obtained on a block-by-block basis; each of the light sources can be changed in luminance within a range from a first upper limit luminance MAX to the minimum luminance LIGHT-OFF, e.g., h=0 and h=1); and allows the backlight to turn on the first light source group and the at least one light source of the first peripheral light source group at the maximum luminance, when the importance level of the first image is greater than or equal to the importance threshold and when the illuminance is greater than or equal to the first threshold (figs. 4-11, ¶ 49-59, lighting amount is corrected when required luminance is not met by the luminance distribution, e.g., see h=1; lighting amount of adjacent light source, e.g., h=2, is increased to ensure required luminance, see fig. 9; see also ¶ 81-85). Regarding claim 8, Sako further teaches wherein the display panel displays a second image in a second image region in the display region (¶ 76-85, same processing is executed for all the segment areas, see fig. 17), wherein the plurality of light sources include a second light source group constituted by at least one light source that overlaps the second image region when observed from a normal direction of the display panel (figs. 1-3, ¶ 47-51; see also figs. 4-10, e.g., group h=1; see also ¶ 3-4; see also fig. 17, ¶ 76-85, same processing is executed for all the segment areas), and a second peripheral light source group constituted by at least one light source located on the periphery of the second light source group (figs. 1-3, ¶ 47-51; see also figs. 4-10, see also fig. 17, ¶ 76-85, same processing is executed for all the segment areas), wherein the control circuit: allows the backlight to turn on the second light source group when the illuminance is less than the first threshold (figs. 4-11, ¶ 49-59, required luminance obtained on a block-by-block basis; each of the light sources can be changed in luminance within a range from a first upper limit luminance MAX to the minimum luminance LIGHT-OFF; see also fig. 17, ¶ 76-85, same processing is executed for all the segment areas); and allows the backlight to turn on the second light source group and at least one light source of the second peripheral light source group, when the illuminance is greater than or equal to the first threshold (figs. 4-11, ¶ 49-59, lighting amount is corrected when required luminance is not met by the luminance distribution, correction performed within the range up to the second upper limit luminance LIMIT; lighting amount of adjacent light source is increased to ensure required luminance, see fig. 9; see also figs. 17-18, ¶ 76-86, same processing is executed for all the segment areas), and wherein, based on a positional relationship between the first image and the second image, the control circuit determines a light source to be turned on when the illuminance is greater than or equal to the first threshold, among light sources included in the first peripheral light source group and the second peripheral light source group (figs. 4-11, ¶ 49-59, lighting amount is corrected when required luminance is not met by the luminance distribution, correction performed within the range up to the second upper limit luminance LIMIT; lighting amount of adjacent light source is increased to ensure required luminance, see fig. 9; see also figs. 17-18, ¶ 76-86, same processing is executed for all the segment areas, priority for plurality of segment areas disclosed). Regarding claim 9, Sako further teaches wherein, when the first image is located near the second image, the control circuit determines turning on of a light source located between the first light source group and the second light source group, in the first peripheral light source group (figs. 4-11, ¶ 49-59, lighting amount is corrected when required luminance is not met by the luminance distribution, correction performed within the range up to the second upper limit luminance LIMIT; lighting amount of adjacent light source is increased to ensure required luminance, see fig. 9; see also figs. 17-18, ¶ 76-86, same processing is executed for all the segment areas, priority for plurality of segment areas disclosed). Regarding claim 11, Sako further teaches wherein the control circuit: allows the backlight to turn on the first light source group at a maximum luminance when the illuminance is less than the first threshold (figs. 4-11, ¶ 49-59, required luminance obtained on a block-by-block basis; each of the light sources can be changed in luminance within a range from a first upper limit luminance MAX to the minimum luminance LIGHT-OFF, e.g., h=1); and allows the backlight to turn on each of the first light source group and the first group at the maximum luminance, when the illuminance is greater than or equal to the first threshold (figs. 4-11, ¶ 49-59, lighting amount is corrected when required luminance is not met by the luminance distribution, correction performed within the range up to the second upper limit luminance LIMIT, e.g., see h=1; lighting amount of adjacent light source, e.g., h=2, is increased to ensure required luminance, see fig. 9; see also ¶ 81-85). Regarding claim 12, Sako further teaches wherein, when the illuminance is less than the first threshold, the control circuit allows the backlight to turn off a light source other than the first light source group (figs. 4-11, ¶ 49-59, required luminance obtained on a block-by-block basis; each of the light sources can be changed in luminance within a range from a first upper limit luminance MAX to the minimum luminance LIGHT-OFF). Regarding claim 13, Aurongzeb discloses wherein, when viewed from an observer's side, the illuminance sensor is disposed next to the display panel (figs. 2-3, ¶ 15, ¶ 19-22, e.g., system 100 may be any mobile or other computing device, ambient light detector disclosed, ¶ 41-42). Regarding claim 14, Aurongzeb discloses thresholds (figs. 1-2, ¶ 15, ¶ 19-22, ¶ 41-42, ¶ 51-55, ALS control thresholds disclosed; see also figs. 4-6). Sako further teaches wherein the control circuit: allows the backlight to turn on the first light source group at a first luminance that is higher as the illuminance is greater and that is less than a second luminance, when the illuminance is less than the first threshold (figs. 4-11, ¶ 49-59, required luminance obtained on a block-by-block basis; each of the light sources can be changed in luminance within a range from a first upper limit luminance MAX to the minimum luminance LIGHT-OFF, e.g., h=1); allows the backlight to turn on the first light source group at the second luminance and the first group at a third luminance that is higher as the illuminance is greater and that is less than the second luminance, when the illuminance is greater than or equal to the first threshold and less than the second threshold (figs. 4-11, ¶ 49-59, lighting amount is corrected when required luminance is not met by the luminance distribution; lighting amount of adjacent light source, e.g., h=2, is increased to ensure required luminance, see fig. 9; see also ¶ 81-85); allows the backlight to turn on the first light source group at the second luminance and each of the first group and the second group at the third luminance, when the illuminance is greater than or equal to the second threshold and less than a third threshold which is greater than the second threshold (figs. 4-11, ¶ 49-59, lighting amount is corrected when required luminance is not met by the luminance distribution, correction performed within the range up to the second upper limit luminance LIMIT, e.g., see h=1 and h=0; lighting amount of adjacent light source, e.g., h=2, is increased to ensure required luminance, see fig. 9; see also ¶ 81-85); and allows the backlight to turn on each of the first light source group, the first group and the second group at the second luminance, when the illuminance is greater than or equal to the third threshold (figs. 4-11, ¶ 49-59, each of the light sources can be changed in luminance within a range from a first upper limit luminance MAX to the minimum luminance LIGHT-OFF; lighting amount is corrected when required luminance is not met by the luminance distribution, correction performed within the range up to the second upper limit luminance LIMIT, e.g., see h=1 and h=0; lighting amount of adjacent light source, e.g., h=2, is increased to ensure required luminance, see fig. 9; see also ¶ 81-85). Claim 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Aurongzeb in view of Sako as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Kim (US 2012/0281027). Regarding claim 7, Sako further teaches wherein the first peripheral light source group comprises a first sub-light source group constituted by at least one light source (figs. 1-3, ¶ 47-51; see also figs. 4-10, e.g., group h=0), and a second sub-light source group that is different from the first sub-light source group and constituted by at least one light source (figs. 1-3, ¶ 47-51; see also figs. 4-10, e.g., group h=2), and wherein the control circuit: allows the backlight to turn on the first light source group and the first sub-light source group, when the illuminance is greater than or equal to the first threshold (figs. 4-11, ¶ 49-59, required luminance obtained on a block-by-block basis; each of the light sources can be changed in luminance within a range from a first upper limit luminance MAX to the minimum luminance LIGHT-OFF, e.g., h=0 and h=1); and allows the backlight to turn on the first light source group, the first sub-light source group, and the second sub-light source group, when the illuminance is greater than or equal to the first threshold (figs. 4-11, ¶ 49-59, lighting amount is corrected when required luminance is not met by the luminance distribution, correction performed within the range up to the second upper limit luminance LIMIT, e.g., see h=1 and h=0; lighting amount of adjacent light source, e.g., h=2, is increased to ensure required luminance, see fig. 9; see also ¶ 81-85). Aurongzeb in view of Sako fails to explicitly disclose when a size of the first image is greater than or equal to a size threshold and when the size of the first image is less than the size threshold. Kim teaches when a size of the first image is greater than or equal to a size threshold and when the size of the first image is less than the size threshold (¶ 103-107, dimming value satisfying an image-quality index is based on comparison of an area of the image with an area threshold value; see also fig. 12, ¶ 124-133, dimming algorithm based on, e.g., image quality). Aurongzeb in view of Sako and Kim are both directed to dimming algorithms for backlit displays. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the device of Aurongzeb in view of Sako with the area threshold of Kim since such a modification determines a dimming value satisfying an image-quality index (Kim, ¶ 103) and a power-saving effect (Kim, ¶ 131). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 11/11/25 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Regarding claim 1, Applicant argues Sako “does not disclose a non-display region” (Remarks, pp. 12-14). Examiner disagrees. As cited above, Sako explicitly discloses that each of the light sources can be changed in luminance within a range from a first upper limit luminance MAX to the minimum luminance LIGHT-OFF. Examiner considers a minimum luminance LIGHT-OFF to be a “non-display region” as is claimed. For example, as shown in fig. 10 of Sako, area h=1/v=1 can be an image region while the areas surrounding this region can be a “non-display region” as is claimed (these regions can initially have a minimum luminance LIGHT-OFF). The rejection of the claims is maintained. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KEITH L CRAWLEY whose telephone number is (571)270-7616. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 10-6 ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Temesghen Ghebretinsae can be reached at 571-272-3017. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KEITH L CRAWLEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2626
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 23, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 21, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112
Oct 09, 2025
Interview Requested
Oct 22, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Nov 11, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 29, 2026
Final Rejection — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597388
DISPLAY DEVICE AND DRIVING METHOD THEREOF USING AN UPDATE VOLTAGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591341
DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING POSITION INPUT SYSTEM WITH PATTERN PROTECTION LAYER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592205
TUNING OF LOCAL DIMMING FUNCTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12567365
DISPLAY APPARATUS, AND ADJUSTMENT METHOD AND FORMATION METHOD THEREOF USING BRIGHTNESS CHANGE RATE TO DETERMINE A POWER VOLTAGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12547279
ILLUMINATED TOUCHPAD HAVING PARALLAX BARRIER LIGHT SOURCE MODULE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+26.4%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 577 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month