Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/000,115

MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, X-RAY DIAGNOSTIC APPARATUS, AND STORAGE MEDIUM STORING MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING PROGRAM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 23, 2024
Priority
Dec 28, 2023 — JP 2023-222421
Examiner
THOMAS, COURTNEY D
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Canon Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
819 granted / 919 resolved
+29.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
933
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.1%
-34.9% vs TC avg
§103
40.0%
+0.0% vs TC avg
§102
7.9%
-32.1% vs TC avg
§112
4.4%
-35.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 919 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Rose et al. (U.S. Patent Application Publication 20220409148) in view of Wang et al. (U.S. Patent Application Publication 20120059253). PNG media_image1.png 400 930 media_image1.png Greyscale As per claims 1, 15 and 16, Rose et al. disclose an apparatus comprising processing circuitry configured to: sequentially acquire an X-ray image including a device (5) inserted into a subject (16); to detect a distal end of the device on the X-ray image (¶[0032-0034]; Figs. 1-2 shown above) Rose et al. do not explicitly disclose an apparatus configured to determine a position on the device distant from the distal end, as a base point and to generate an image in which at least a position of the base point is located at a same position or within a predetermined range including the position, among a plurality of X-ray images, and display the image on a display. PNG media_image2.png 388 500 media_image2.png Greyscale Wang et al. teach guiding catheter tip (404) and IVUS catheter (408), wherein the guiding catheter tip (404) is used as a reference point for registering IVUS catheter (408) locations and the positions of the IVUS catheter (408) and guiding catheter tip (404) are continuously identified in frames of a fluoroscopic image sequence(¶¶[0036-0037] - Fig. 4 shown above). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the apparatus of Rose et al. to determine a position on the device distant from the distal end as a reference point and utilize the reference point for registration of device locations among image frames, as taught by Wang et al. One would have been motivated to make such a modification to ensure a stable and distinguishable reference point is used to register device locations in sequential fluoroscopic images as taught by Wang et al. (¶[0037]). [Examiner note: Claims 1, 15, and 16 are rejected together because claims 15 and 16 recite the apparatus and computer-readable-medium implementation of substantially the same image processing operations recited in claim 1]. Claims 2-7 recite setting a display region extending from the distal end to the base point, displaying the display region, detecting a device line, determining the base point along the device line at a predetermined distance from the distal end, selecting the predetermined distance according to imaging conditions or protocol, converting the predetermined distance into image pixels, and accounting for three-dimensional device information. These features define a portion of the device to be displayed and provide a method for determining and locating the base point within the image. It would have been obvious to define the displayed device region using the distal end and base point and to determine the base point using distance-based geometric relationships, image coordinates, and available imaging geometry because such operations represent predictable implementation details for tracking and displaying a selected portion of a device in sequential medical images. Claims 8-10 recite changing the predetermined distance according to an amount of change of the device in the display region, proposing a change of the base point when a threshold is exceeded, and receiving user input to change the base point. These features adjust the displayed device region when device movement changes and allow the user to modify the selected base point. It would have been obvious to adapt the base-point location according to device movement and provide notification and user control because such features improve usability and allow the displayed region to remain relevant during an interventional procedure. Claims 11-14 recite displaying the distal end, device line, base point, or display-region frame as distinguishable overlays, determining a second base point at a different distance from the distal end, generating a display region using the base point and second base point, maintaining the second base point within the display region, and displaying an enlarged region together with the display region. These features provide additional visual references and display options for viewing the tracked device. It would have been obvious to provide additional reference points, visual overlays, and enlarged display views because such features assist a user in viewing, tracking, and navigating the device within the displayed medical images. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to COURTNEY D THOMAS whose telephone number is (571)272-2496. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9 AM - 5 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Makiya can be reached at 571-272-2273. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /COURTNEY D THOMAS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2884
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 23, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12674897
ESTIMATING A RADIATION LOAD QUANTITY FOR AN IMAGING SYSTEM HAVING A RADIATION SOURCE
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12669447
ARTICLE INSPECTION APPARATUS
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12663388
INSPECTION SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12650393
MATERIAL WEIGHTING OF PROJECTION BASED SPECTRAL X-RAY IMAGING
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12642497
FLUOROSCOPIC POSITIONING GUIDANCE
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+9.1%)
2y 0m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 919 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month