Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026
Application No. 19/000,203

OPTICAL LAMINATE AND IMAGE DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING SAME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 23, 2024
Priority
Dec 27, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0192596
Examiner
NORDMEYER, PATRICIA L
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Dongwoo Fine-chem Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
56%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 56% of resolved cases
56%
Career Allowance Rate
652 granted / 1155 resolved
-3.5% vs TC avg
Strong +37% interview lift
Without
With
+37.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
59 currently pending
Career history
1206
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
50.1%
+10.1% vs TC avg
§102
23.1%
-16.9% vs TC avg
§112
17.0%
-23.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1155 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1 – 8, 10, 12 – 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nakata et al. (EP 3 525 016) in view of Yun et al. (USPGPub 2023/0374344 A1). Nakata et al. disclose an optical laminate (Abstract; Figures) comprising: transparent film substrate with a thickness of 10 to 100 µm (Paragraphs 0014 – 0016); a first hard coating layer formed on the transparent film substrate with a thickness of 10 to 30 µm (Figures, #3; Paragraph 0018); and a second hard coating layer formed on the first hard coating layer with thickness of 3 to 20 µm (Paragraph 0063; Figures, #7), wherein the second hard coating layer is formed of a second hard coating composition comprising a light-transmitting resin (Paragraphs 0063 – 0078, wherein it has to be light transmitting in order for the user to see the display) as in claims 1 - 4. With respect to claim 5, one or more of the first hard coating composition and the second hard coating composition further comprise an additive (Paragraphs 0054 and 0070). Regarding claim 12, the transparent substrate, the first hard coating layer, and the second hard coating layer are characterized in that they are formed by directly contacting each other without including a separate layer (Figures; Abstract). For claim 13, the optical laminate is for being applied to a flexible display (Paragraph 0002, a recitation of the intended use of the claimed invention must result in a structural difference between the claimed invention and the prior art in order to patentably distinguish the claimed invention from the prior art. If the prior art structure is capable of performing the intended use, then it meets the claim.). In claim 14, an image display device comprising the optical laminate according claim 1 (Paragraph 0002). However, Nakata et al. fail to disclose a glass layer, the first hard coating layer is formed of a first hard coating composition comprising an epoxy acrylic resin and an epoxy silane coupling agent, the additive includes one or more selected from the group consisting of a silicone-based leveling agent, an ultraviolet stabilizer, and a heat stabilizer, one or more hard coating compositions of the first hard coating composition and the second hard coating composition further comprise an initiator and a solvent, the first hard coating composition comprises, based on the total weight of the composition, 20 to 80 parts by weight of an epoxy acrylic resin; 1 to 30 parts by weight of an epoxy silane coupling agent; 0.1 to 10 parts by weight of an initiator; and 50 to 98 parts by weight of a solvent, the epoxy silane coupling agent includes one or more selected from 3-glycidoxypropyldimethoxysilane, 3- glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane, 8-glycidoxyoctyltrimethoxysilane, and 2-(3,4- epoxycyclohexyl)ethyltrimethoxysilane. Yun et al. teach an optical laminate (Figures; Abstract) having a glass layer (Paragraph 0100) with a hard coating layer is formed of a hard coating composition comprising an epoxy acrylic resin and an epoxy silane coupling agent (Paragraphs 0105 – 0116), the additive includes one or more selected from the group consisting of an ultraviolet stabilizer, and a heat stabilizer (Paragraph 0141), one or more hard coating compositions of the hard coating composition comprise an initiator and a solvent (Paragraphs 0125 – 0127 and 0135), the hard coating composition comprises, based on the total weight of the composition, 20 to 80 parts by weight of an epoxy acrylic resin; 1 to 30 parts by weight of an epoxy silane coupling agent; 0.1 to 10 parts by weight of an initiator; and 50 to 98 parts by weight of a solvent (Paragraphs 0148 - 0149), the epoxy silane coupling agent includes one or more selected from 3- glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane,, and 2-(3,4- epoxycyclohexyl)ethyltrimethoxysilane (Paragraphs 0113) for the purpose of forming a laminate with excellent mechanical properties (Abstract). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have a hard coating composition comprising an epoxy acrylic resin and an epoxy silane coupling agent in Nakata et al. in order to form a laminate with excellent mechanical properties. Claims 9 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nakata et al. (EP 3 525 016) in view of Yun et al. (USPGPub 2023/0374344 A1) as applied to claims 1 and 7 above, and further in view of KR 20080101800. A machine-generated translation of KR 20080101800 accompanies this action. In reciting this rejection, the examiner will cite this translation. Nakata et al., as modified with Yun et al., discloses the claimed invention except for the second hard coating composition comprises, based on the total weight of the composition, 1 to 80 parts by weight of a light- transmitting resin; 0.1 to 10 parts by weight of an initiator; and 50 to 98 parts by weight of a solvent, and the light-transmitting resin includes one or more selected from 2-hydroxyethyl (meth)acrylate, 2-hydroxyisopropyl (meth)acrylate, 4-hydroxybutyl (meth)acrylate, caprolactone ring-opening hydroxyacrylate, pentaerythritol tri/tetra (meth)acrylate, and dipentaerythritol penta/hexa (meth)acrylate. KR 20080101800 teach a hard coat composition comprises, based on the total weight of the composition, 1 to 80 parts by weight of a light- transmitting resin; 0.1 to 10 parts by weight of an initiator; and 50 to 98 parts by weight of a solvent (Page 7, line 25 to Page 8, line 12 and the light-transmitting resin includes one or more selected from pentaerythritol tri/tetra (meth)acrylate or dipentaerythritol penta/hexa (meth)acrylate (Page4, lines 30 – 32) for the purpose of forming a film with excellent clearness of image (Abstract). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have a light-transmitting resin with the desired composition in Nakata et al. in order to form a film with excellent clearness of image as taught by KR 20080101800. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Patricia L Nordmeyer whose telephone number is (571)272-1496. The examiner can normally be reached 10am - 6:30pm EST, Monday - Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alicia Chevalier can be reached at 571-272-1490. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Patricia L. Nordmeyer/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 1788 /pln/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1788 July 29, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 23, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12673779
LOW EMISSIVITY MATERIAL FOR INFLATABLE SAFETY PRODUCTS
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12662819
ROOF MEMBRANE WITH A FOLDED RELEASE LINER
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12661871
WINDSHIELD PROTECTOR AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURING AND USING SAME
1y 12m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12655324
SEAL MEMBER
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12655326
CONDUCTIVE PATTERNS AND METHODS THEREOF
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
56%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+37.1%)
2y 11m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1155 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month