Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/000,335

PORTABLE BALLISTIC-RESISTANT SHIELD

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Dec 23, 2024
Examiner
ELDRED, JOHN W
Art Unit
3641
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Hallas Ip Group LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allow Rate
767 granted / 992 resolved
+25.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
1014
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
44.1%
+4.1% vs TC avg
§102
14.8%
-25.2% vs TC avg
§112
15.7%
-24.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 992 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claim 1 line 3, “thereby from an enclosed cavity” is vague and indefinite. It appears to be a typographical error that should read “form an enclosed cavity”. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-4, 9, 12-15, 17, 19, and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Boydd (2023/0417513). Boydd discloses a portable shield 200 comprising most claimed elements including a first cover and a second cover with lips that are coupled to each other to form a cavity (note that without further limitations, the front face of shield cover 10 and an adjacent portion of the side of the cover meets the limitations of the first cover, and the rear face of shield cover 10 and an adjacent portion of the side of the cover meets the limitations of the second cover, and the remainder of the sides comprise the coupling element); a concave (see Figure 6) panel 20 with no holes that fits entirely within the cavity and that is larger across a first end than a second end and where the panel is a ballistic protection panel; a retention system comprising a strap that wraps around the panel to hold it in place; a handle 14 on the cover; and a removable firearm support 70. Boydd fails to specify the particular penetration parameters of the panel. However, the mere choice of ballistic panels with specific protection parameters are considered to have been obvious engineering choices at the time of the application’s filing that would be chosen to provide the required protection in a particular situation for the user. This is especially considered to have been obvious since Applicant does not appear to claim or indicate that the panels per se are inventive, merely the shield apparatus in combination with a ballistic panel, so the particular protection parameters could be provided by known prior art panels. In regard to claim 9, the mere addition of a second orthogonal strap is considered to have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time of the application’s filing. Having a second strap to secure elements is notoriously well known in many technology areas because having a second strap provides redundant protection in case of the first strap failing as well as providing additional support in a second direction. Thus, having a second orthogonal strap is considered an obvious addition to provide improved performance. Claims 5-9, 10, 11, and 16 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 18 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Martinez et al, Boyd, Seuk, and McMurray are cited as being of interest since they disclose shields. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to J. WOODROW ELDRED whose telephone number is (571)272-6901. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Troy Chambers can be reached at 571-272-6874. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /J. Woodrow Eldred/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3641 JWE
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 23, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601554
FIREARM LOADER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595988
Stitched Body Armor Panels with Offset Construction
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12571602
Trigger Assembly
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12571605
Firearm Shooting Rest
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12566050
PROTECTIVE VEHICLE SURROUND SHIELD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+7.8%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 992 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month