Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 19/000,658

ELECTRONIC DEVICES

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Dec 23, 2024
Priority
Jan 30, 2023 — continuation of PCTCN2023073877
Examiner
MISHLER, ROBIN J
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Shenzhen Shokz Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
76%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
508 granted / 730 resolved
+9.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
745
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
59.2%
+19.2% vs TC avg
§102
32.4%
-7.6% vs TC avg
§112
5.0%
-35.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 730 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2, 5-7, 9, 11 and 16-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kirita (US 2015/0179366). Regarding claim 1, Kirita discloses an electronic device, comprising a housing component (see fig. 4), a circuit board (7, fig. 4), and an antenna bracket (5, fig. 4), wherein the housing component includes a bin body (2-3 in fig. 4) and a lampshade (17, fig. 4 and 3B in fig. 1) disposed in a sidewall of the bin body (see 3b in fig. 4 and 3B in fig. 4), the antenna bracket and the circuit board are at least partially accommodated in the bin body (see fig. 4), an indicator light (11-12 in fig. 4) is disposed on a side of the circuit board facing the lampshade (see fig. 4), the antenna bracket is disposed on the side of the circuit board facing the lampshade (see fig. 4), the antenna bracket includes an antenna support portion (5 and 5e and 3 in fig. 4; wherein they both connect to antenna 15, see para. 72 wherein the operation knob is fixed to the antenna and para. 57 wherein the slider 5 is attached to knob 3) and a light guide portion (5c and 5d, fig. 4) connected with the antenna support portion (see fig. 4), and light emitted by the indicator light is transmitted to the lampshade through the light guide portion (para. 58 and fig. 2) and then emitted to the outside of the electronic device (see Abstract and para. 58-59). Regarding claim 2, Kirita discloses wherein a center of an orthographic projection of the lampshade (see 3B, fig. 1) the circuit board does not coincide with a center of the indicator light (C2 in fig. 2 and in fig. 1) and in a normal direction of the circuit board, an area of a cross section of an end of the light guide portion close to the circuit board is greater than an area of a cross section of the other end of the light guide portion close to the lampshade (see 17 in fig. 2 and in fig. 4; wherein 17 narrows towards 3). Regarding claim 5, Kirita discloses wherein the light guiding portion (5c and 5d in fig. 4) is connected with the antenna support portion (3, fig. 4 and para. 57) through a connection rib (5b, fig. 4), and a ratio of a thickness of the connection rib in a normal direction of the circuit board to a height of the light guide portion in the normal direction is in a range of 0.3-0.5 (see fig. 4; further wherein the ratio of thickness is a design choice, wherein design choices do not merit patentability). Regarding claim 6, Kirita discloses wherein the antenna support portion, the light guide portion, and the connection rib are an integral structural component made of a same material (see para. 43; wherein components are mad of resin). Regarding claim 7, Kirita discloses wherein an antenna pattern (15, fig. 4) is provided on a side of the antenna support portion (3, fig. 4 and para. 72) away from the circuit board (see fig. 4), and the antenna pattern (including 16, fig. 4 and see para. 54) abuts against the circuit board through a metal elastic (6, fig. 4) member (para. 54). Regarding claim 9, Kirita discloses wherein the housing component includes an end cover (18, fig. 4), the antenna bracket and the circuit board are at least partially inserted into the bin body through an open end of the bin body (2, fig. 4) along an insertion direction (see fig. 4), and the end cover is connected with the open end of the bin body such that the circuit board (fig. 4 and para. 60) and the antenna bracket are located in the housing component (fig. 4 and para. 60). Regarding claim 11, Kiriti discloses comprising a support component (8, fig. 4) and a core module (9, fig. 4) connected with the support component (see fig. 4), wherein the support component is configured to support the core module to be worn to a wearing position (see fig. 4 and para. 46), the housing component serves as a portion of the support component (see fig. 4), and the core module is electrically connected with the circuit board (para. 49). Regarding claim 16, Kirita discloses wherein the sliding key component (3, fig. 4) includes an adapter frame (5, fig. 4) disposed in the housing component (fig. 4) and a sliding key (5 and 3 in fig. 4), the sliding key toggles a toggle switch (14, fig. 4) disposed on the circuit board by the adapter frame (see fig. 4), the adapter frame includes an annular body portion (3a in fig. 4) and a first plug-in portion (5b, fig. 4) connected with the annular body portion (see fig. 4), the first plug-in portion is connected with the toggle switch (para. 63; wherein they connect through 5f). Regarding claim 17, Kirita discloses wherein the sliding key (3, fig. 4) includes an operation portion (left side of 3 in fig. 4), a second plug-in portion (other 5a in fig. 4) connected with the operation portion, and a snap-fit portion (5b, fig. 4) connected with the second plug-in portion (see fig. 4), the operation portion is disposed on an outer side of the housing component (see fig. 4), the second plug-in portion penetrates through a sliding groove (2a, fig. 4) to extend into an insertion groove of the annular body portion (para. 63), and the snap-fit portion is buckled with a side of the annular body portion (3a, fig. 4) facing the circuit board (para. 57). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-4, 8, 10 and 12-15 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims have been considered but are moot in view of new grounds of rejection. See new citations above. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBIN J MISHLER whose telephone number is (571)270-7251. The examiner can normally be reached on 8:00-5:00 M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, NITIN PATEL can be reached on (571)272-7677. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROBIN J MISHLER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2628
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 23, 2024
Application Filed
May 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jul 22, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 06, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12704922
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR INCREASING TOUCH RESPONSE SPEED
1y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12684988
DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674986
ADJUSTABLE DISPLAY ARRANGEMENT FOR EXTENDED REALITY DEVICES
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12676121
DISPLAY PANEL, DRIVING METHOD, AND DISPLAY DEVICE
1y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12675188
DISPLAY DEVICE AND TOUCH SENSING SYSTEM INCLUDING THE SAME
1y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
76%
With Interview (+5.9%)
2y 7m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 730 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month