Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 19/000,996

TORSION BAR BRACKET WITH BUSHING

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 24, 2024
Priority
Oct 23, 2019 — provisional 62/925,145 +2 more
Examiner
KEENAN, JAMES W
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Maxon Industries Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
765 granted / 1145 resolved
+6.8% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+24.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
1176
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
43.0%
+3.0% vs TC avg
§102
16.3%
-23.7% vs TC avg
§112
35.4%
-4.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1145 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: par. [0047], line 6, “increase” should apparently be --decrease--. Appropriate correction is required. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Marder (EP 0875421) in view of Wu (US 5,476,163) and the Maxon Lift YouTube video (hereinafter referred to as Maxon), all previously cited in parent application 17/634,383. Marder shows a system comprising: a sliding bar 5 disposed between a platform section 1 and a flipover 2 of a lift platform; a rotatable portion 6 fixedly connected to the sliding bar; and a sliding bar mount 9/10 connected to the lift platform; wherein the sliding bar mount slidably receives a portion of the sliding bar. Although not a claim limitation, Marder further discloses that the sliding bar is operatively connected to a torsion bar 7 disposed in the lift platform, wherein the torsion bar is fixedly connected to the rotatable portion and a first attachment point 12 in the lift platform, and the torsion bar comprises a twist between the rotatable portion and the first attachment point to reduce a pull force for moving the flipover between open (Fig. 10), middle (Fig. 8) and closed (Fig. 9) positions. Marder does not show a separate receiver portion connected to the lift platform, or the sliding bar mount to be pivotally connected to the lift platform and a bushing disposed in the sliding bar mount, wherein the bushing slidably receives the portion of the sliding bar; and wherein the bushing reduces the pull force for moving the flipover between at least one of the open position and the middle position or the closed position and the middle position. However, since a portion of the sliding bar is slidably received in the sliding bar mount, if a bushing was added to the sliding bar mount, it would clearly slidably receive a portion of the sliding bar. Further, the examiner notes it is generally well known to provide a bushing between two parts of a device, to act as a lining for an opening in one of the parts in or through which the other of the parts extends, to serve various purposes such as limiting the size of the opening, providing a bearing surface, resisting abrasion, serving as a guide, insulating a through conductor, or reducing friction and wear, as a simple internet search for “bushing definition” will attest (e.g., Merriam-Webster.com). In particular, Wu discloses a bushing 3 provided in a bracket 4 (sliding bar mount), wherein the bushing slidably receives a portion of a sliding bar 2, wherein the bushing allows the torsion bar to slide relative to the bracket (col. 2:17-22 and 40-55). Maxon, as noted in the Written Opinion for corresponding international application PCT/US2020/056902, shows a system comprising: a sliding bar disposed between a platform section and a flipover of a lift platform; a receiver portion connected to the lift platform; and a sliding bar mount pivotally connected to the receiver portion. It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have modified the apparatus of Marder by providing a receiver portion as a distinct element from the sliding bar mount, wherein the receiver portion was connected to the lift platform and the sliding bar mount was pivotally connected to the receiver portion, as shown by Maxon, to allow relative movement therebetween during the range of motion of the flipover between the open, middle and closed positions, thereby allowing the sliding bar to more easily slide relative to the mount, and by providing a bushing in the sliding bar mount for slidably receiving a portion of the sliding bar, as suggested by Wu, to reduce a pull force for moving the flipover while also providing dampening, alignment and/or stress relief. When modified as above, the bushing would clearly reduce the pull force for moving the flipover between at least one of the above-noted open and middle positions or the closed and middle positions. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. All references were cited in parent application 17/634,383. As such, no copies of foreign references are being furnished with this Office action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to James Keenan whose telephone number is (571)272-6925. The examiner can normally be reached Mon. - Thurs. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ernesto Suarez can be reached on 571-270-5565. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /James Keenan/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 3652 7/28/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 24, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12692070
CONTAINER HANDLING VEHICLE WHICH CAN LOAD AND/OR UNLOAD ITSELF
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12685681
AUTOMATIC SELECTABLE SLIDING DECK SYSTEM FOR WHEELCHAIR USER
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12679642
REFUSE VEHICLE WITH A HOPPER FILL SENSOR
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679644
STORAGE SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR STORING OBJECTS IN SUCH A STORAGE SYSTEM
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12668421
GRIPPING DEVICE
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+24.5%)
2y 10m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1145 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month