Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/001,067

APPARATUSES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR LOW LATENCY SELECTION POLICY FOR MEMORY COMMANDS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 24, 2024
Examiner
ROSSITER, SEAN D
Art Unit
2133
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Micron Technology, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allow Rate
591 granted / 665 resolved
+33.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
7 currently pending
Career history
672
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
§103
41.3%
+1.3% vs TC avg
§102
34.3%
-5.7% vs TC avg
§112
16.8%
-23.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 665 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 10, & 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by La Fratta et al. PG Pub US 2023/0060826 A1 [hereinafter La Fratta]. Regarding claims 1, 10 & 16, La Fratta discloses: receiving a plurality of commands at a controller (the memory sub-system controller 115 can receive commands or operations from the host system 120 and can convert the commands or operations into instructions or appropriate commands to achieve the desired access to the memory devices 130 [0027]); organizing the plurality of commands into a priority queue (The command queue component 311 can include multiple command queues 312-1, 312-2, . . . , 312-N (individually or collectively referred to as command queue 312) [0041] The priority of the commands can be determined by multiple factors including, but not limited to, the scheduling policy used in the command scheduling component, the type of the command, and the age of the command [0031]); selecting, from the priority queue, a command from the plurality of commands to issue to a memory device based on a first-ready, first-come, first-served (FRFCFS) command selection policy, wherein the FRFCFS command selection policy is modified such that a bank of the memory device associated with an oldest read command is opened (When the read priority of the FRFCFS command scheduler is enabled, if the oldest read command 544 of the memory bank is not the oldest read command 544 of the row of the memory bank, the oldest read command 544 of that row of the memory bank, instead of the oldest read command 544 of the memory bank, can be added to the scheduling candidate list 503 [0057] the processing device can add the activate command for the row of the memory bank that is accessed by the oldest read command to the command scheduler in response to determining the memory bank has a corresponding read command in response to determining that the memory bank is not active [0062]). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-9, 11-15, & 17-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art of record fails to disclose “counting, with the controller, a number of banks ready to receive commands; comparing the number of the banks ready to a threshold value; and based on the comparing, preempting the modified FRFCFS command policy and selecting at least one read command of the plurality of commands associated with at least one of the banks ready to receive commands to issue to the memory device.” The closest prior art, Dutu et al. PG Pub 2024/0220107 A1 [hereinafter Dutu], discloses the use of counters to track the number of banks that are active and ready to receive commands. However, Dutu uses the counters to modify the stall thresholds and not to preempt the modified FRFCFS command policy and selecting at least one read command of the plurality of commands associated with at least one of the banks ready to receive commands to issue to the memory device Claims 3-9, 12-15, & 18-20 are objected for depending on objected claims 2, 11, & 17. Notes The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Van der Veen et al. PG Pub US 2024/0312508 A1 discloses counting, by a DRAM device, a number of row activation commands directed to each row of a bank of the DRAM device. Balakrishnan PG Pub US 2022/0317923 A1 discloses tracked bank group numbers in entries of a bank group tracking circuit. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SEAN D ROSSITER whose telephone number is (571)270-3788. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8AM-4PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Rocio Del Mar Perez-Velez can be reached at 571-270-5935. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SEAN D ROSSITER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2133
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 24, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602329
ATOMIC MEMORY OPERATIONS FOR ADDRESS TRANSLATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596503
STORAGE DEVICE INITIALIZING E-FUSE REGION, AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596653
Memory Migration and Page Fault Avoidance
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12585599
Resource-Sensitive Scheduling Of Time-Independent Operations
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578890
BLOCK REPLACEMENT USING COMBINED BLOCKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+8.8%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 665 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month