Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/001,213

CONTROL METHOD, APPARATUS AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 24, 2024
Priority
Dec 27, 2023 — CN 202311825362.X
Examiner
MANOHARAN, MUTHUSWAMY GANAPATHY
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Lenovo (United States) Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 9m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allowance Rate
416 granted / 640 resolved
+5.0% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
701
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
68.0%
+28.0% vs TC avg
§102
18.7%
-21.3% vs TC avg
§112
5.8%
-34.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 640 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6, 8, 9, 10-15, 17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hotes et al. (hereinafter Hotes)(US 2020/0228646). Regarding claim 1, Hotes teaches a method for controlling devices, comprising: determining that a state of a connection between a first device (Fig. 1, mobile device, item 109; an OBD device) and a second device(Fig. 1, in vehicle system 102) has changed(abstract); determining that the first device is in a target state, wherein in the target state, the first device is connected to the second device through a first connection(P[0092], Bluetooth connection; the device has been unlocked), and based on the first connection, the first device maintains an unlocked screen state; and performing a first operation, the first operation being used to make the first device exit the target state(P[0092], detecting the device has been unlocked; locking the screen). Regarding claim 2, Hotes teaches the method according to claim 1, wherein the state of the connection between the first device and the second device has changed includes: the connection between the first device and the second device having changed from a first state of the connection to a second state of the connection, wherein in the first state of the connection, the first device receives and displays display data from the second device(P[0087], banner(if the device is unlocked), while the second device is in a locked screen state(P[0092], on-screen keyboard of the device will no longer appear); and in the second state of the connection, the first device receives keyboard input data from the second device and displays its own display data(P[0092], Bluetooth device can send keyboard shorten command for locking the device). Regarding claim 3, Hotes teaches the method according to claim 2, further comprising: determining that the first device and the second device have switched from a third state of the connection to the second state of the connection, wherein in the third state of the connection, the first device receives and displays display data from the second device, while the second device is in the unlocked screen state; and performing a second operation, wherein the second operation is used to make the first device enter the target state(P[0087], notifications will not appear on the lock screen (if the device is locked) or as a banner(if the device is unlocked); also P[0092]). Regarding claim 4, Hotes teaches the method according to claim 1, wherein the state of the connection between the first device and the second device has changed includes: the connection between the first device and the second device having changed from a fourth state of the connection to a fifth state of the connection, wherein in the fourth state of the connection, the first device and the second device are connected through both the first connection and a second connection, and in the fifth state of the connection, the first connection is maintained, and the second connection is disconnected(P[0092], Bluetooth device (an OBD-II device) can be paired to the driver’s device; sending the device to lock screen and thus preventing interaction with any apps on the phone). Regarding claim 5, Hotes teaches the method according to claim 4, wherein the first connection is a wireless connection and the second connection is a direct physical connection(P[0049], plug in adapter or Bluetooth beacon; Fig 2). Regarding claim 6, Hotes teaches the method according to claim 4, wherein the first connection is a wireless connection, and the second connection is a wireless connection, the first connection and the second connection being different, the maximum connection range of the second connection being shorter than that of the first connection(P[0049], Bluetooth and cellular). Regarding claim 8, Hotes teaches the method according to claim 1, wherein the process of performing the first operation includes: disconnecting the first connection(P[0085-0086], disable the screen lock and allow unrestricted usage in case of emergency and ignition turned off). Claims 9, 10-15, 17 are rejected for the same reason as set forth in claims 1, 1-6, 8 respectively. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 7, 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hotes et al. (hereinafter Hotes)(US 2020/0228646) in view of Jafar et al. (hereinafter Jafar)(US 11,947,655). Regarding claim 7, Hotes teaches all the particulars of the claim except the method according to claim 1, wherein performing the first operation includes: removing the device information of the second device from a trusted device list of the first device, wherein the first device maintains the unlocked screen state if it establishes a connection with a device on the trusted device list. However, Jafar teaches in an analogous art wherein performing the first operation includes: removing the device information of the second device from a trusted device list of the first device, wherein the first device maintains the unlocked state if it establishes a connection with a device on the trusted device list(col. 15, lines53-67; identifiers stored in the companion data store; abstract, authentication to enable devices to transition from locked to unlocked state). Therefore, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use the method wherein performing the first operation includes: removing the device information of the second device from a trusted device list of the first device, wherein the first device maintains the unlocked screen state if it establishes a connection with a device on the trusted device list in order to have improved security. Claim 16 is rejected for the same reason as set forth in claim 7. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MUTHUSWAMY GANAPATHY MANOHARAN whose telephone number is (571)272-5515. The examiner can normally be reached 6:30am-3:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alison T Slater can be reached at 571-270-0375. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MUTHUSWAMY G MANOHARAN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2647
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 24, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12763446
FILTER, PHASE SHIFTER, AND RELATED APPARATUS
4y 3m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12750814
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPROVING POSITIONING OF A MOBILE DEVICE USING CHANNEL CONDITIONS
5y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12739734
TECHNIQUES FOR SURROUNDING INFORMATION INDICATION
4y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12732940
METHOD FOR DETERMINING POSITIONING REFERENCE SIGNALING CONFIGURATION INFORMATION
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12720462
USER EQUIPMENT POWER CONSUMPTION MODELING
5y 1m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+15.9%)
3y 7m (~1y 9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 640 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month