Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/001,521

Bone Conduction Microphone

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 25, 2024
Priority
Jun 06, 2024 — continuation of PCTCN2024097642
Examiner
LIEBGOTT, TYLER MICHAEL
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
AAC Technologies Holdings Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
76%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
16 granted / 22 resolved
+12.7% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
53
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
76.0%
+36.0% vs TC avg
§102
12.8%
-27.2% vs TC avg
§112
9.6%
-30.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 22 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yuan et al (US Pub No. 2023/0247352, hereinafter Yuan). Regarding claim 1, Yuan teaches a bone conduction microphone (Abstract & fig. 9, bone conduction microphone), comprising: a substrate (Fig. 9, base structure 810) having a cavity with two end openings (Fig. 9, openings above and below acoustic transducer unit 820); a backplate disposed above the substrate (Fig. 7, lead structure 7200 above base structure 710); a vibration structure disposed between the backplate and the substrate (Fig. 9, acoustic transducer unit 820), comprising a diaphragm disposed between the backplate and the substrate and arranged at intervals with the backplate and the substrate respectively (Fig. 9, acoustic transducer unit 820 between base structure 810 and upper opening) and a mass block suspended by the diaphragm and inserted into the cavity through one end opening of the cavity (Fig. 9, mass element 840 suspended from acoustic transducer 820 and inside base structure 810 cavity); and a limiter for limiting a maximum displacement of the vibration structure (¶ [0213], limiting structure). Regarding claim 2, Yuan teaches the bone conduction microphone as described in claim 1, wherein the limiter is a first protrusion arranged on a side of the backplate facing the diaphragm for limiting the maximum displacement of the vibration structure towards the backplate (¶ [0213], limiting structure may be located above laminated structure and set opposite to the laminated structure). Regarding claim 3, Yuan teaches the bone conduction microphone as described in claim 1, wherein the limiter is a second protrusion arranged on a side of the diaphragm facing the backplate for limiting the maximum displacement of the vibration structure towards the backplate (¶ [0213], limiting structure may be located above laminated structure). Regarding claim 4, Yuan teaches the bone conduction microphone as described in claim 1, wherein the limiter is a third protrusion arranged on a side of the mass block away from the diaphragm for limiting the maximum displacement of the vibration structure away from the backplate (¶ [0213], the limiting structure and mass units may be arranged at intervals). Regarding claim 5, Yuan teaches the bone conduction microphone as described in claim 1 further comprising a mounting plate, wherein the substrate is mounted on the mounting plate, and the mounting plate covers another end opening of the cavity (¶ [0102], base structure may be fixedly connected to an inner wall of the housing); the limiter is a fourth protrusion disposed in the cavity and arranged on a side of the mounting plate facing the vibration structure, the fourth protrusion faces and is spaced apart from the mass block for limiting the maximum displacement of the vibration structure away from the backplate (¶ [0213], limiting structure may be located in hollow position of base structure). Regarding claim 6, Yuan teaches the bone conduction microphone as described in claim 1 further comprising a mounting plate, wherein the substrate is mounted on the mounting plate, and the mounting plate covers another end opening of the cavity (¶ [0102], base structure may be fixedly connected to an inner wall of the housing); the diaphragm, the substrate and the mounting plate together form a sealed space, the limiter is the sealed space for limiting the maximum displacement of the vibration structure away from the backplate (Fig. 9, bone conduction microphone having sealed space below acoustic transducer unit 820). Regarding claim 7, Yuan teaches the bone conduction microphone as described in claim 1, wherein the substrate comprises a main body part forming the cavity and a sub part disposed in the cavity and arranged at intervals with the main body part, at least part of the mass block is formed by the sub part (Fig. 9, base structure 810 including support arms 830 and mass element 840). Regarding claim 8, Yuan teaches the bone conduction microphone as described in claim 7, wherein a side of the sub part away from the diaphragm is provided with a fifth protrusion, the limiter is the fifth protrusion for limiting the maximum displacement of the vibration structure away from the backplate (Fig. 9 & ¶ [0195], elastic layer of support arms 830). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Zhou et al (US Pub No. 2022/0248136) teaches a bone conduction microphone having a spring-mass damping system. Asnes et al (US Patent No. 9020174) teaches a bone conduction hearing aid device having contact stops positioned to limit undesired movement. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TYLER LIEBGOTT whose telephone number is (703)756-1818. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 10-6:30 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Fan Tsang can be reached at (571)272-7547. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /T.M.L./Examiner, Art Unit 2694 /FAN S TSANG/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2694
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 25, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684273
DIPOLE LOUDSPEAKER ASSEMBLY
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12633297
SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF PROCESSING AUDIO DATA WITH A MULTI-RATE LEARNABLE AUDIO FRONTEND
2y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12621611
ELECTRET MICROPHONE
2y 11m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12610192
POLE PLATE AND SPEAKER
2y 10m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12604143
SOUND DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
76%
With Interview (+3.6%)
2y 9m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 22 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month