Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/001,725

MEMORY DEVICE, SYSTEM-ON-CHIP CONFIGURED TO CONTROL MEMORY DEVICE, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 26, 2024
Priority
Jun 04, 2024 — RE 10-2024-0072966
Examiner
ROSSITER, SEAN D
Art Unit
2133
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
599 granted / 674 resolved
+33.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
3 currently pending
Career history
676
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.4%
-36.6% vs TC avg
§103
41.6%
+1.6% vs TC avg
§102
33.8%
-6.2% vs TC avg
§112
16.9%
-23.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 674 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 2, 12, & 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nagashima et al. PG Pub US 2024/0078173 A1 [hereinafter Nagashima] in view of Gans et al PG Pub US 2020/0004420 A1 [hereinafter Gans]. Regarding claim 1, Nagashima discloses: a memory device configured to operate in a current frequency set point (FSP) operation mode among a plurality of FSP operation modes (writing one or more values to the mode register may cause the memory to operate at a particular frequency set point and use appropriate operation parameters for the particular frequency set point [0019]); a temperature monitoring circuit configured to monitor a temperature range of the memory device (semiconductor device 200 may include a temperature sensor 235. The temperature sensor 235 may monitor a temperature of the semiconductor device 200 [0052]), wherein the SoC is further configured to control the current FSP operation mode based on a current operation frequency of the memory device and a current temperature range of the memory device, and wherein the plurality of FSP operation modes include a first FSP operation mode for an operation of the memory device at a first operation frequency and a first temperature range (Mode register write commands may be issued by the controller 10 to one or more of the memories 110 to control one or more operating conditions of the memories 110 [0019]), and a second FSP operation mode for an operation of the memory device at the first operation frequency and a second temperature range higher than the first temperature range (the training operation may be performed at other times, for example, responsive to a temperature change and/or a change in operating conditions (e.g., change in frequency of operation memory 110, change in frequency of the system or data clock signals) [0030]). It is noted that Nagashima fails to explicitly disclose: a system-on-chip (SoC) configured to control the memory device, wherein the memory device includes: FSP mode register sets configured to store a plurality of FSP data sets respectively corresponding to the plurality of FSP operation modes and a wherein the plurality of FSP operation modes include a first FSP operation mode for an operation of the memory device at a first operation frequency and a first temperature range. However, Gans discloses: a system-on-chip (SoC) configured to control the memory device, wherein the memory device includes: FSP mode register sets configured to store a plurality of FSP data sets respectively corresponding to the plurality of FSP operation modes (the mode register 225 may include multiple registers for bank architecture to store information to switch between multiple bank architecture settings. Each of the settings for the modes and features having multiple registers may be associated with a respective frequency set point. Thus, several modes and features may be switched from one setting to another to change frequency set point by instructing the semiconductor device to switch from one of the registers for the several modes and features to another one of the registers for the several modes and features [0029]). The system of Gans would enable the system of Nagashima to use the temperature sensor to enable the command decoder 215 also accesses a mode register 225 that stores information for setting (e.g., selecting from) various modes and features of operation for the semiconductor device 200 [0028]. The systems of Nagashima and Gans are analogous because they are from the “same field of endeavor” and from the same “problem solving area.” Namely, they are both from the field of “memory control.” It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to combine the systems of Nagashima and Gans since this would enable the system of Nagashima to be comprised of mode set registers. This system would improve designing semiconductor memories that can meet the different memory operating requirements and configurations demanded [0003]. Regarding claim 2 the limitations of this claim have been noted in the rejection of claim 1. Nagashima also discloses: wherein each of the FSP data sets includes information about operating parameters of the memory device in a respective one of the FSP operation modes, and wherein the memory device further includes: a control logic circuit configured to control the operating parameters of the memory device based on a current FSP data set corresponding to the current FSP operation mode from among the FSP data sets (Mode register write commands may be issued by the controller 10 to one or more of the memories 110 to control one or more operating conditions of the memories 110…writing one or more values to the mode register may cause the memory to operate at a particular frequency set point and use appropriate operation parameters for the particular frequency set point [0019]). Regarding claim 12 the limitations of this claim have been noted in the rejection of claim 1. Nagashima also discloses: wherein the memory device further includes a temperature monitoring mode register configured to store temperature data, and wherein the temperature data includes information about the current temperature range of the memory device and information about whether the current temperature range is changed (The temperature sensor 235 may provide a temperature to the mode register 275, which may write a value indicative of the sense temperature to a register of the mode register 275 at regular intervals [0052]). Regarding claim 19, Nagashima discloses: A memory device that is configured to operate based on a current frequency set point (FSP) operation mode among a plurality of FSP operation modes, the memory device comprising: an FSP selection mode register configured to store information about the current FSP operation mode; FSP mode register sets configured to store FSP data sets respectively corresponding to the plurality of FSP operation modes (writing one or more values to the mode register may cause the memory to operate at a particular frequency set point and use appropriate operation parameters for the particular frequency set point [0019]); a temperature monitoring mode register configured to store temperature data associated with a current temperature range of the memory device; a temperature monitoring circuit configured to monitor the current temperature range (The temperature sensor 235 may provide a temperature to the mode register 275, which may write a value indicative of the sense temperature to a register of the mode register 275 at regular intervals [0052]); and a control logic circuit configured to control operating parameters of the memory device based on an FSP data set corresponding to the current FSP operation mode from among the FSP data sets, wherein the plurality of FSP operation modes include a first FSP operation mode for an operation of the memory device in a first temperature range, and a second FSP operation mode for an operation of the memory device in a second temperature range higher than the first temperature range, and wherein the current FSP operation mode is determined based on the temperature data (If a difference between a previously written temperature and a current temperature is above a threshold, the mode register 275 may provide a temperature signal to the command decoder 215 and/or other component of semiconductor device 200. Responsive to the signal, the semiconductor device 200 may provide an output to the memory controller indicating the temperature change. The output may be provided via one or more DQ terminals and/or another terminal. Responsive, at least in part, to the temperature signal, the memory controller may initiate the training operation [0052]). It is noted that Nagashima fails to explicitly disclose: a system-on-chip (SoC) configured to control the memory device, wherein the memory device includes: FSP mode register sets configured to store a plurality of FSP data sets respectively corresponding to the plurality of FSP operation modes and a wherein the plurality of FSP operation modes include a first FSP operation mode for an operation of the memory device at a first operation frequency and a first temperature range. However, Gans discloses: a system-on-chip (SoC) configured to control the memory device, wherein the memory device includes: FSP mode register sets configured to store a plurality of FSP data sets respectively corresponding to the plurality of FSP operation modes (the mode register 225 may include multiple registers for bank architecture to store information to switch between multiple bank architecture settings. Each of the settings for the modes and features having multiple registers may be associated with a respective frequency set point. Thus, several modes and features may be switched from one setting to another to change frequency set point by instructing the semiconductor device to switch from one of the registers for the several modes and features to another one of the registers for the several modes and features [0029]). The system of Gans would enable the system of Nagashima to use the temperature sensor to enable the command decoder 215 also accesses a mode register 225 that stores information for setting (e.g., selecting from) various modes and features of operation for the semiconductor device 200 [0028]. The systems of Nagashima and Gans are analogous because they are from the “same field of endeavor” and from the same “problem solving area.” Namely, they are both from the field of “memory control.” It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to combine the systems of Nagashima and Gans since this would enable the system of Nagashima to be comprised of mode set registers. This system would improve designing semiconductor memories that can meet the different memory operating requirements and configurations demanded [0003]. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-11 & 20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The closest prior art of record, Nagashima, discloses the use of FSP registers and temperature sensors to monitor and control RAM modes. However, Nagashima is using the temperature to determine if a training operation is to be performed. The objected claims limit claim interpretations from reading on Nagashima. Claims 13-18 are allowed. Independent claim 13 contains the allowable subject matter previously disclosed. Notes The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Mulani et al. PG Pub US 2024/0345743 A1 discloses that a controller may determine that if the temperature is outside a temperature range, the controller may increase or decrease the frequency at which the temperature is checked to control the temperature of the memory device. Mahajan et al. PG Pub US 2026/0086964 A1 discloses wherein the DRAM device includes a frequency set point register that specifies operation of the DRAM device at a particular frequency of multiple possible frequencies. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SEAN D ROSSITER whose telephone number is (571)270-3788. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8AM-4PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Rocio Del Mar Perez-Velez can be reached at 571-270-5935. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SEAN D ROSSITER/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2133
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 26, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 02, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jun 02, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jul 16, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12748705
MULTI-CORE PROCESSOR-BASED SYSTEM IMPLEMENTING DIRECTED PAGE TABLE ENTRY INVALIDATION
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12743210
Data Storage Device That Detects and Releases Bottlenecks in Hardware
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12743209
CONTROLLER ARCHITECTURE FOR RELIABILITY, AVAILABILITY, SERVICEABILITY ACCESS
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12710867
STORAGE DEVICE AND STORAGE SYSTEM INCLUDING THE SAME
1y 9m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12711055
WORDLINE GROUP-BASED IDENTIFICATION OF GOOD MEMORY BLOCKS DURING A PROGRAMMING OPERATION
1y 8m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+8.9%)
2y 4m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 674 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month