Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/002,000

MEDIUM PROCESSING APPARATUS AND IMAGE FORMING SYSTEM INCORPORATING SAME

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 26, 2024
Priority
Jan 31, 2024 — JP 2024-013685
Examiner
NICHOLSON III, LESLIE AUGUST
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Ricoh Company, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
1183 granted / 1340 resolved
+28.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
1352
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
52.7%
+12.7% vs TC avg
§102
27.1%
-12.9% vs TC avg
§112
19.4%
-20.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1340 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority 1. Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 2. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. 3. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 4. Claims 1,5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Takahashi et al. USP 10,406,772. Takahashi discloses, regarding claim 1, A medium processing apparatus comprising: a liquid applier to apply liquid onto a medium; and a post-processing device (teeth 82) to perform a process on a media bundle including the medium with the liquid applied by the liquid applier, wherein the liquid applier includes: a liquid application member having an end portion (86) to contact with the medium to apply the liquid onto the medium; a liquid storage (88) to store the liquid to be supplied to the liquid application member; a movement mechanism to move the liquid application member toward or away from the medium to bring the end portion into contact with the medium or separate the end portion from the medium as an approaching operation (see at least C15/L56-C16/L4, fig.17-19); and a compression support (90,104) to compress the liquid application member according to the approaching operation of the movement mechanism (C9/L55-61, C17/L3-14). Regarding claim 5, An image forming system (fig.1) comprising: an image forming apparatus (A) to form an image on a medium; and the medium processing apparatus (B) according to claim 1 to perform the process on multiple media including the medium having the image formed by the image forming apparatus. 5. Claims 1,5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Takai et al. JP 2015-101009 A. Takai discloses, regarding claim 1, A medium processing apparatus comprising: a liquid applier to apply liquid onto a medium; and a post-processing device (91) to perform a process on a media bundle including the medium with the liquid applied by the liquid applier, wherein the liquid applier includes: a liquid application member having an end portion (96) to contact with the medium to apply the liquid onto the medium; a liquid storage (97) to store the liquid to be supplied to the liquid application member; a movement mechanism to move the liquid application member toward or away from the medium to bring the end portion into contact with the medium or separate the end portion from the medium as an approaching operation (drive mechanism discussed in at least ¶0030, fig.6); and a compression support to compress the liquid application member according to the approaching operation of the movement mechanism (see unlabeled support arm connecting end portion 96 to rotating shaft 96a; see at least ¶0030, fig.6). Regarding claim 5, An image forming system (fig.1) comprising: an image forming apparatus (1) to form an image on a medium; and the medium processing apparatus (50) according to claim 1 to perform the process on multiple media including the medium having the image formed by the image forming apparatus. Allowable Subject Matter 6. Claims 2-4 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion 7. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Yamanaka et al. (JP 2017-013930 A) discloses A medium processing apparatus comprising at least a post-processing device (20), a liquid storage (27), a liquid application member (28) movable between a retracted position (P2) and a liquid application position (P1), and a movement mechanism (51). 8. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LESLIE A. NICHOLSON III whose telephone number is (571)272-5487. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-4. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael C McCullough can be reached at 571-272-7805. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LESLIE A NICHOLSON III/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3653 6/26/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 26, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679687
MEDIUM STACKING DEVICE, PRINTING SYSTEM, AND CONTROL METHOD OF MEDIUM STACKING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679689
SHEET HANDLING APPARATUS THAT HANDLES MULTIPLE SHEETS AND IMAGE FORMING SYSTEM
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679688
MEDIUM PROCESSING APPARATUS AND IMAGE FORMING SYSTEM INCORPORATING SAME
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12654975
MEDIUM PROCESSING APPARATUS AND IMAGE FORMING SYSTEM INCORPORATING SAME
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12649321
PRINTING SYSTEM
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+5.2%)
2y 1m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1340 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month