Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 19/002,226

IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 26, 2024
Priority
Feb 01, 2024 — JP 2024-014341
Examiner
HUNTSINGER, PETER K
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
29%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
Est. Remaining
44%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 29% of cases
29%
Career Allowance Rate
98 granted / 339 resolved
-31.1% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 6m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
389
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.6%
-30.4% vs TC avg
§103
52.7%
+12.7% vs TC avg
§102
17.0%
-23.0% vs TC avg
§112
19.5%
-20.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 339 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 7-9, 11 and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Shimizu US Publication 2015/0229788 (hereafter “Shimizu”). Referring to claim 1, Shimizu discloses an image forming apparatus, comprising: a storage device storing a first built-in application for performing a first function, a second built-in application for performing a second function (paragraph 96, The bundle 501 represents the name of each application existing on the application storage area 330), and a web server application associated with the second built-in application (paragraph 52, The image processing apparatus 100 includes the Web browser 380); an operation panel configured to receive user selections; and a processor configured to: receive instructions to execute the first built-in application and the second built-in application in conjunction with the first built-in application (paragraph 129, A menu screen 901 is displayed when the client application 392 is executed on the Web browser 380 and used to select a function of the image processing apparatus 100 to be used); execute the first built-in application to perform the first function (paragraph 131, When the user presses, for example, the printer button on the menu screen 901 to select the printer function, the Web browser 380 makes a transition to a print application selection screen 902); activate the web server application associated with the second built-in application (paragraph 112, In step S701, when a user 700 presses a button (not shown) on the user input device 202 to activate the Web browser 380, the image processing apparatus 100 executes a program that activates the Web browser 380); and after activating the web server application, execute the second built-in application to perform the second function (paragraph 258, When the menu screen 901 makes a transition to the print application selection screen (not shown), "print appli B" and "print appli SP" are displayed as selectable applications from the Intent information table 800). Referring to claim 7, Shimizu discloses a communication interface connectable to a cloud-based environment (paragraph 69, The communication unit 381 is software that performs HTTP communication via the network device 201). Referring to claim 8, Shimizu discloses wherein the processor is configured to end execution of the first built-in application after beginning execution of the second built-in application (paragraph 90, In step S431, the application management unit 331 executes processing of stopping the application on the application storage area 330 designated by the request instruction). Referring to claim 9, Shimizu discloses wherein the first function is a document scanning function (paragraph 130, In this embodiment, the client application 392 includes HTML data that forms a screen to select functions such as scan, copy, fax, and printer). Referring to claim 11, Shimizu discloses a multi-functional peripheral device, comprising: a communication interface connectable to a cloud-based environment (paragraph 69, The communication unit 381 is software that performs HTTP communication via the network device 201); a storage device storing a first built-in application for performing a first function, a second built-in application for performing a second function (paragraph 96, The bundle 501 represents the name of each application existing on the application storage area 330), and a web server application associated with the second built-in application (paragraph 52, The image processing apparatus 100 includes the Web browser 380); an operation panel configured to receive user selections; and a processor configured to: receive instructions to execute the first built-in application and the second built-in application in conjunction with the first built-in application (paragraph 129, A menu screen 901 is displayed when the client application 392 is executed on the Web browser 380 and used to select a function of the image processing apparatus 100 to be used); execute the first built-in application to perform the first function (paragraph 131, When the user presses, for example, the printer button on the menu screen 901 to select the printer function, the Web browser 380 makes a transition to a print application selection screen 902); activate the web server application associated with the second built-in application (paragraph 112, In step S701, when a user 700 presses a button (not shown) on the user input device 202 to activate the Web browser 380, the image processing apparatus 100 executes a program that activates the Web browser 380); and after activating the web server application, execute the second built-in application to perform the second function (paragraph 258, When the menu screen 901 makes a transition to the print application selection screen (not shown), "print appli B" and "print appli SP" are displayed as selectable applications from the Intent information table 800). Referring to claim 17, Shimizu discloses a printer unit for printing documents (paragraph 47, The image processing apparatus 100 also includes a printing device 207 that prints image data). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2-6, 10, 12-16 and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shimizu US Publication 2015/0229788 as applied to claims 1, 9 and 11 above, and further in view of well known prior art. Referring to claims 2 and 12, Shimizu discloses wherein the operation panel comprises a panel display (paragraph 47, The image processing apparatus 100 includes a UI display device 203 such as a liquid crystal display that displays an operation screen), and the processor is configured to display a selectable list of built-in applications on the touch panel display (paragraph 129, A menu screen 901 is displayed when the client application 392 is executed on the Web browser 380 and used to select a function of the image processing apparatus 100 to be used). While Shimizu discloses an operation panel, Shimizu does not disclose expressly that the operation panel comprises a panel display. Official Notice is taken that it is well known and obvious in the art to provide a touch panel display (See MPEP 2144.03). The motivation for doing so would have been to simply the manner of receiving input from the user. Therefore, it would have been obvious to combine well known prior art with Shimizu to obtain the invention as specified in claims 2 and 12. Referring to claims 3 and 13, Shimizu discloses wherein the instructions for executing the first built-in application and the second built-in application are provided by one or more user selections made via the touch panel display (paragraph 129, A menu screen 901 is displayed when the client application 392 is executed on the Web browser 380 and used to select a function of the image processing apparatus 100 to be used). Referring to claims 4 and 14, Shimizu discloses wherein the processor is configured to end execution of the first built-in application after beginning execution of the second built-in application (paragraph 90, In step S431, the application management unit 331 executes processing of stopping the application on the application storage area 330 designated by the request instruction). Referring to claims 5 and 15, Shimizu discloses wherein the first function is a document scanning function (paragraph 130, In this embodiment, the client application 392 includes HTML data that forms a screen to select functions such as scan, copy, fax, and printer). Referring to claims 6, 10, 16 and 18, Shimizu discloses wherein the second function is a storing of a file resulting from execution of the first built-in application (paragraph 258, When the menu screen 901 makes a transition to the print application selection screen (not shown), "print appli B" and "print appli SP" are displayed as selectable applications from the Intent information table 800), but does not disclose expressly that the second function is cloud-based storage. Official Notice is taken that it is well known and obvious in the art to provide a cloud-based storage application (See MPEP 2144.03). The motivation for doing so would have been to allow user to store scanned images for greater accessibility. Therefore, it would have been obvious to combine well known prior art with Shimizu to obtain the invention as specified in claims 6 and 16. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PETER K HUNTSINGER whose telephone number is (571)272-7435. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:30 - 5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Benny Q Tieu can be reached at 571-272-7490. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PETER K HUNTSINGER/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2682
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 26, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12700167
SLIT LAMP MICROSCOPE, OPHTHALMIC INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, OPHTHALMIC SYSTEM, METHOD OF CONTROLLING SLIT LAMP MICROSCOPE, AND RECORDING MEDIUM
4y 5m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12694570
DIVIDING AN ASTC TEXTURE TO A SET OF SUB-IMAGES
4y 3m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12689744
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR COMPENSATING RECONSTRUCTED IMAGE FRAMES
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12678025
ENDOSCOPE IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, ENDOSCOPE IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND ENDOSCOPE IMAGE PROCESSING PROGRAM
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12615337
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS WITH A WIRELESS TAG COMMUNICATION DEVICE THAT RADIATES A RADIO WAVE TO TWO AREAS
2y 3m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
29%
Grant Probability
44%
With Interview (+15.4%)
4y 6m (~2y 10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 339 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month