Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/002,317

HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLE, CONTROL METHOD FOR HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLE, POWER SUPPLY MODE SETTING SYSTEM, AND POWER SUPPLY MODE SETTING METHOD

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 26, 2024
Examiner
SOOFI, YAZAN A
Art Unit
3668
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allow Rate
720 granted / 809 resolved
+37.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
828
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
18.0%
-22.0% vs TC avg
§103
31.0%
-9.0% vs TC avg
§102
38.6%
-1.4% vs TC avg
§112
9.3%
-30.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 809 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA Status of Claims Claims 1-12 of U.S. Application No. 19/002317 filed on 12/26/2024 have been examined. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1-12 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Wray et al. [US 2022/0205796 A1], hereinafter referred to as Wray. As to Claim 1, 10, 11 and 12, Wray discloses a hybrid electric vehicle ([see at least Fig. 3, 0039, 0067 and 0068]) comprising: an engine configured to output power using fuel from a fuel tank ([see at least Fig. 3, 0039, 0067, 0068 and 0092]); a generator configured to generate power using a power from the engine ([see at least Fig. 3, 0039, 0067 and 0068]); a power storage device connected to a power line together with the generator (([see at least Fig. 3, 0039, 0067 and 0068]); and a controller, wherein when a user desires external power supply, in which power is supplied from the vehicle to outside of the vehicle, the controller is programmed to present the user with multiple power supply modes that have different power supply characteristics ([see at least Fig. 3, 0033, 0039, 0067, 0068, 0180 and 0229]), and when the user selects one of the multiple power supply modes, the controller is programmed to perform the external power supply in the power supply mode selected by the user ([see at least Fig. 3, 0033, 0039, 0067, 0068, 0180 and 0229]). As to Claim 2, Wray discloses a hybrid vehicle, wherein the multiple power supply modes include, as a predetermined power supply mode for operating the engine and generating power with the generator, at least two of a first power supply mode that prioritizes noise suppression, a second power supply mode that prioritizes power supply performance, and a third power supply mode that prioritizes fuel efficiency ([see at least Fig. 3, 0033, 0039, 0067, 0068, 0180 and 0229]). As to Claim 3, Wray discloses a hybrid vehicle, wherein the predetermined power supply mode is a mode for operating the engine and generating power with the generator when a state of charge of the power storage device is less than a predetermined ratio during the external power supply ([see at least Fig. 3, 0033, 0039, 0067, 0068, 0180 and 0229]). As to Claim 4, Wray discloses a hybrid vehicle, wherein the controller presents the user with the multiple power supply modes, including a recommended power supply mode based on a current environment ([see at least 0028, 0033, 0102 and 0229]). As to Claim 5, Wray discloses a hybrid vehicle, wherein the controller presents the recommended power supply mode and other power supply modes to the user in a manner that differs from each other ([see at least 0028, 0033, 0102 and 0229]). As to Claim 6, Wray discloses a hybrid vehicle, wherein the multiple power supply modes include, as a predetermined power supply mode for operating the engine and generating power with the generator when a state of charge of the power storage device is less than a predetermined ratio during the external power supply ([see at least 0081, 0093 and 0229]), a first power supply mode that prioritizes noise suppression, a second power supply mode that prioritizes power supply performance, and a third power supply mode that prioritizes fuel efficiency, the controller sets the recommended power supply mode to the first power supply mode when a current time is within a predetermined time period, the controller sets the recommended power supply mode to the second power supply mode when the current time is not within the predetermined time period and a fuel amount in the fuel tank is greater than or equal to a predetermined amount, and the controller sets the recommended power supply mode to the third power supply mode when the current time is not within the predetermined time period and the fuel amount is less than the predetermined amount ([see at least 0033, 0081, 0093 and 0229]). As to Claim 7, Wray discloses a hybrid vehicle, wherein the controller sets the recommended power supply mode to the first power supply mode when the current time is within the predetermined time period and when a vehicle's current location is within a residential area, the controller sets the recommended power supply mode to the second or third power supply mode based on the fuel amount when the current time is within the predetermined time period and when the vehicle's current location is outside the residential area ([see at least 0028, 0033, 0102 and 0229]). As to Claim 8 and 9, Wray discloses a hybrid vehicle, wherein the first power supply mode is a mode for operating the engine to output a first power, the second power supply mode is a mode for operating the engine to output a second power greater than the first power, and the third power supply mode is a mode for operating the engine at a more efficient operating point compared to the first and second power supply modes ([see at least Fig. 3, 0033, 0039, 0067, 0068, 0180 and 0229]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to YAZAN A SOOFI whose telephone number is (469)295-9189. The examiner can normally be reached on Flex schedule. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Fadey Jabr can be reached on 572-272-1516. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /YAZAN A SOOFI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3668
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 26, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600426
A VEHICLE WITH ADVERTISING DISPLAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12602059
ROBOT, CONTROL METHOD FOR ROBOT, AND RECORDING MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12602062
REDUCING RESISTANCE TO MOVEMENT OF DEVICES THAT INCLUDE CASTERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12583482
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MODE CONFUSION AVOIDANCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585290
UNMANNED VEHICLE, SYSTEM OF CONTROLLING UNMANNED VEHICLE, AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING UNMANNED VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+11.3%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 809 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month