Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 14, 2026
Application No. 19/003,005

PRINTER AND PRINT POSITION ALIGNMENT METHOD

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 27, 2024
Priority
Dec 28, 2023 — JP 2023-222559
Examiner
UHLENHAKE, JASON S
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Roland DG Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
1037 granted / 1189 resolved
+27.2% vs TC avg
Minimal -2% lift
Without
With
+-2.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
1213
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
54.9%
+14.9% vs TC avg
§102
33.3%
-6.7% vs TC avg
§112
6.8%
-33.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1189 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-2, 4-5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over LaCaze et al (U.S. Pub. 2017/0253024) in view of Izume (U.S. Pub. 2017/0157964) Regarding claim 1, a printer comprising: an ink head including a plurality of nozzles aligned in a first direction to discharge ink (Figures 2-3; Abstract; Paragraphs 0029-0030) A rotator to hold a printed object including an outer surface and rotate the printed object about an axis extending in a second direction orthogonal to the first direction (Paragraphs 0016, 0028) A controller configured or programmed to control the ink head and the rotator (Abstract; Paragraphs 0031-0033), and to include: A nozzle range acquirer to acquire a nozzle usage range of nozzles of the plurality of nozzles that discharge ink (Paragraphs 0014, 0033) Izume discloses a first position acquirer to acquire a first position that is desired print start position on the outer surface of the printed object (Paragraphs 0081, 0087, 0095; printing start positions are determined) An alignment to rotate the printed object will be performed so that the first position of the printed object opposed the nozzles (Paragraphs 0081, 0087, 0095-0097) It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teaching of a first position acquirer as taught by Izume into the device comprising the nozzle range acquirer as taught by LaCaze, for the purpose of improving the printing accuracy of the printer by the inspection process to acquire the desired start position Regarding claim 2, wherein the nozzle usage range acquirer is configured or programmed to acquire the nozzle usage range based on a curvature of the outer surface of the printed object (Paragraphs 0014, 0033) Regarding claim 4, a pointer to irradiate light toward the printed object; wherein the first position acquirer is configured or programmed to acquire, as the first position, a position on the outer surface of the printed object that is irradiated with the light of the pointer (Figure 2; Paragraphs 0061, 0067) Regarding claim 5, a print position alignment method for a printer including an ink head with a plurality of nozzles aligned in a first direction to discharge ink, and a rotator to hold a printed object including an outer surface and to rotate the printed object about an axis extending in a second direction orthogonal to the first direction (Figures 2-3; Abstract; Paragraphs 0028-0030) Acquiring a nozzle usage range of nozzles of the plurality of nozzles that discharge ink (Paragraphs 0014, 0033) Izume discloses a first position acquirer to acquire a first position that is desired print start position on the outer surface of the printed object (Paragraphs 0081, 0087, 0095; printing start positions are determined) An alignment to rotate the printed object will be performed so that the first position of the printed object opposed the nozzles (Paragraphs 0081, 0087, 0095-0097) It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teaching of a first position acquirer as taught by Izume into the device comprising the nozzle range acquirer as taught by LaCaze, for the purpose of improving the printing accuracy of the printer by the inspection process to acquire the desired start position Allowable Subject Matter Claim 3 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The primary reason for the allowance of claim 3 is the inclusion of the limitation of the controller is configured or programmed to include: a pass number acquirer to acquire a pass number, which is a number of times the ink head moves over a predetermined area of the outer surface of the printed object in the second direction in order to print on the predetermined area; and a second position acquirer to acquire a second position, which is a position at a rotationally downstream end of a most rotationally upstream one of divided ranges obtained by dividing the nozzle usage range based on the pass number; and the aligner is configured or programmed to rotate the printed object so that the first position and the second position coincide with each other. It is this limitation found in each of the claims, as it is claimed in the combination, that has not been found, taught or suggested by the prior art of record which makes these claims allowable over the prior art. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JASON S UHLENHAKE whose telephone number is (571)272-5916. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8:00 am - 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Douglas X. Rodriguez can be reached at (571) 431-0716. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JASON S UHLENHAKE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2853 July 14, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 27, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703193
PRINTING APPARATUS, PRINTING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12697813
INKJET PRINTING HEAD
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12697811
METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR DROPLET DEPOSITION
1y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12691686
INK JET RECORDING METHOD AND INK JET RECORDING APPARATUS
1y 11m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12679094
LIQUID DISCHARGE HEAD, LIQUID DISCHARGE APPARATUS, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING LIQUID DISCHARGE HEAD
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (-2.2%)
2y 2m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1189 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month