Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 19/004,606

METHOD AND CONTROL SYSTEM FOR AND UPDATING CAMERA CALIBRATION FOR ROBOT CONTROL

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 30, 2024
Priority
Apr 12, 2019 — continuation of 10/576,636 +2 more
Examiner
TRAN, DALENA
Art Unit
3657
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Mujin Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
949 granted / 1082 resolved
+35.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
1098
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.8%
-34.2% vs TC avg
§103
58.6%
+18.6% vs TC avg
§102
20.3%
-19.7% vs TC avg
§112
7.1%
-32.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1082 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This application has been examined. Claims 21-40 are pending. The prior art submitted on 12/30/24 has been considered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 21-40, are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Haeusler et al. (US 2020/0282575 A1) As per claim 21, Haeusler et al. disclose a method of updating camera calibration, the method comprising: determining an idle period in which at least a portion of a robot is not or will not be moving (see at least [0043] disclose determining whether a pose in the set of poses is reachable. In one implementation, determining reachability includes both determining whether the robot arm 102 is able to move into the defined position and also that the calibration chart 300 is within the view of the robot optical sensor 502a); receiving one or more calibration images representing a calibration pattern during the idle period and performing a calibration operation based on the one or more calibration images, wherein the calibration operation outputs updated calibration information (see at least [0044-0045] disclose at a given range and translation position, the end effector 114 holding the calibration chart 300 is stepped through a range or orientation angles in each of roll pitch, and yaw, with a sufficient number of transition angles in each orientation dimension to avoid gaps. Then, the end effector 114 is moved to a different translation position and the orientation variations are again stepped through. This is repeated until sufficient imagery covers the range of reachable 6DoF). As per claim 22, Haeusler et al. disclose generating one or more movement commands for causing the calibration pattern to be moved to or toward one or more locations (see at least the abstract disclose moving, based at least on the pose data, the robot arm into a plurality of poses; at each pose of the plurality of poses, capturing a set of images of the calibration chart with the first optical sensor and recording a pose; calculating intrinsic calibration parameters, based at least on the set of captured images; and calculating extrinsic calibration parameters, based at least on the set of captured images). As per claim 23, Haeusler et al. disclose the one or more location is based on calibration information (see at least [0028-0029] disclose the robot arm is then automatically moved to each pose and an image is captured and recorded along with the position and orientation of the calibration chart. The resulting set of images is used to calculate the intrinsic lens calibration). As per claim 24, Haeusler et al. disclose the one or more locations is based on a robot task (see at least [0036] disclose specification of the movement of the robot arm 102 so that the end-effector 114 achieves a desired task is known as motion planning). As per claims 25-26, Haeusler et al. disclose the idle period is a period of time in which one or more movement command for performing a robot task are not output, and the calibration pattern is performed during the idle period (see at least [0043] disclose determining whether a pose in the set of poses is reachable. In one implementation, determining reachability includes both determining whether the robot arm 102 is able to move into the defined position and also that the calibration chart 300 is within the view of the robot optical sensor 502a). As per claim 27, Haeusler et al. disclose the calibration operation is performed during movement of the robot (see at least [0028-0029] disclose the robot arm is then automatically moved to each pose and an image is captured and recorded along with the position and orientation of the calibration chart. The resulting set of images is used to calculate the intrinsic lens calibration). Claims 28-34, are system claims corresponding to method claims 21-27 above. Therefore, they art rejected for the same rationales set forth as above. Claims 35-40, are non-transitory computer-readable medium claims corresponding to method claims 21-26 above. Therefore, they art rejected for the same rationales set forth as above. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant’s disclosure: . Maximilian Beinhofer (11559899) . Kazuto Murase (11407102) . Akane Nakashima (10569414) Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DALENA TRAN whose telephone number is (571)272-6968. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ADAM MOTT can be reached at 571-270-5376. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DALENA TRAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3657
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 30, 2024
Application Filed
May 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12630154
A METHOD FOR HANDLING OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS WHEN DRIVING BETWEEN TWO AREAS
1y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12617098
METHOD, APPARATUS, AND SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATING OPERATION OF A MACHINE
3y 4m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12617088
ROBOT AND CONTROL METHOD THEREFOR
2y 3m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12613510
On-Robot Data Collection
2y 3m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12600031
TACTILE ROBOTIC TRAINING PLATFORM
2y 2m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+9.7%)
2y 8m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1082 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month