Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/004,685

BIOINFORMATION ACQUISITION DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 30, 2024
Examiner
LEE, Y YOUNG
Art Unit
2485
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
48%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
73%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 48% of resolved cases
48%
Career Allow Rate
200 granted / 418 resolved
-10.2% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+25.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
431
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.7%
-32.3% vs TC avg
§103
35.0%
-5.0% vs TC avg
§102
37.5%
-2.5% vs TC avg
§112
9.4%
-30.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 418 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in parent Application No. 18/035,184, filed on 6/8/23. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Otsubo et al (2009/0232362) in view of Aoki et al (2014/0198957). Otsubo et al, in Figs. 1, 3, and 23, discloses substantially the same biometric information acquisition device as specified in claim 1 of the present invention, comprising a housing including a bottom surface side 900, a top surface side 803, a front surface side, a back surface side [0198], and an opening 805 in the front surface side between the bottom surface side and the top surface side, the opening defining an imaging space within the housing [0196]; a camera 200 disposed in the housing; an illumination 100 disposed in the housing between the top surface side and the opening. It is noted Otsubo fails to disclose imaging a palm. However, Aoki teaches the concept of such well known camera 2 being configured to capture an image of a palm [0018]-[0019] of a hand of a user when inserted into the imaging space [0020]. Although Aoki does not specifically mention the palm facing the top surface side, it is considered obvious that imaging of the palm may be performed from any side of the housing; wherein the illumination being configured to illuminate the imaging space from above toward the palm. Although Aoki does not specify a display configured to prompt the user to insert the palm into the imaging space with the palm facing the top surface side, it is also considered obvious to include such prompt since the user needs to know which side of the housing is performing the scanning. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, having both the references of Otsubo et al and Aoki before him/her, to incorporate the well known palm scanning technique as taught by Aoki in the biometric device of Otsubo in order to photograph the biometric information of any part of the hand, including fingers and palm. Claim 2, Aoki teaches the illumination has an annular shape 3. Claim 3, Aoki also teaches the camera 2 is disposed within a periphery of the annular shape of the illumination 3, when viewed in an orthogonal direction from the top surface side (e.g. Fig. 1). Claim 4, Aoki teaches the camera 2 is disposed in the housing between the illumination 3 and the top surface side (e.g. Fig. 3). Claim 5, Aoki teaches the housing has a cylindrical shape (e.g. Fig. 4). Claim 6, Otsubo teaches the opening includes a rectangular shape (e.g. Fig. 23). Claim 7, Otsubo teaches the edges 805 of the rectangular shape are chamfered. Claim 8, although Aoki does not specify the location of a display 101, it is consider obvious to place it anywhere in front of the user near the opening. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, having both the references of Otsubo et al and Aoki before him/her, to incorporate the well known user friendly display device near the opening of the biometric device of Otsubo in view of Aoki in order to prompt user in case he/she misplaces the palm. Claim 9, although Aoki does not specify the location of a display 101, it is consider obvious to place it anywhere in front of the user near the opening. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, having both the references of Otsubo et al and Aoki before him/her, to incorporate the well-known user-friendly display device near the opening of the biometric device of Otsubo in view of Aoki in order to prompt user in case he/she misplaces the palm. Claim 10, Aoki teaches the camera 2 is disposed closer to the bottom surface side than the illumination (e.g. Fig. 1). Claim 11, Aoki teaches a mirror 6 disposed in the housing, the mirror being configured to reflect light from the illumination toward the palm of the hand of the user when inserted into the imaging space with the palm facing the top surface side, wherein the mirror is disposed in the housing between the camera and the top surface side. Although Aoki does not specifically mention the palm facing the top surface side, it is considered obvious that imaging of the palm may be performed from any side of the housing; wherein the illumination being configured to illuminate the imaging space from above toward the palm. Although Aoki does not specify a display configured to prompt the user to insert the palm into the imaging space with the palm facing the top surface side, it is also considered obvious to include such prompt since the user needs to know which side of the housing is performing the scanning. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, having both the references of Otsubo et al and Aoki before him/her, to incorporate the well known palm scanning technique as taught by Aoki in the biometric device of Otsubo in order to photograph the biometric information of any part of the hand, including fingers and palm. Claim 12, Aoki teaches the camera 2 and the mirror overlap, when viewed in an orthogonal direction from the front surface side (e.g. Fig. 4). Claim 13, Aoki teaches each of the camera 2 and the illumination 3 overlap with the mirror, when viewed in an orthogonal direction from the front surface side (e.g. Fig. 4). Claim 14, Otsubo teaches the housing includes a second opening 803 above the imaging space 100, the camera being between the second opening and the top surface side, and the illumination illuminates the inside of the imaging space from above the second opening. Although Aoki does not specifically mention the palm facing the top surface side, it is considered obvious that imaging of the palm may be performed from any side of the housing; wherein the illumination being configured to illuminate the imaging space from above toward the palm. Although Aoki does not specify a display configured to prompt the user to insert the palm into the imaging space with the palm facing the top surface side, it is also considered obvious to include such prompt since the user needs to know which side of the housing is performing the scanning. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, having both the references of Otsubo et al and Aoki before him/her, to incorporate the well known palm scanning technique as taught by Aoki in the biometric device of Otsubo in order to photograph the biometric information of any part of the hand, including fingers and palm. Claim 15, Otsubo teaches the second opening 803 is smaller than an angle of view of the camera 200. Claim 16, Otsubo teaches the second opening 803 is smaller than an illumination range of the illumination 100. Claim 17, Otsubo teaches a height of the opening increases from the back surface side of the housing to the front surface side of the housing (e.g. Fig. 24). Claim 18, Otsubo teaches the opening includes an elliptical shape (e.g. Fig. 24). Claim 19, Aoki teaches a mirror 6 disposed in the housing, the mirror being configured to reflect light from the illumination toward the palm of the hand of the user when inserted into the imaging space with the palm, wherein the mirror is further configured to reflect the palm of the hand in the imaging space, and the camera 2 is configured to capture the image of the palm of the hand reflected by the mirror. Although Aoki does not specifically mention the palm facing the top surface side, it is considered obvious that imaging of the palm may be performed from any side of the housing; wherein the illumination being configured to illuminate the imaging space from above toward the palm. Although Aoki does not specify a display configured to prompt the user to insert the palm into the imaging space with the palm facing the top surface side, it is also considered obvious to include such prompt since the user needs to know which side of the housing is performing the scanning. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, having both the references of Otsubo et al and Aoki before him/her, to incorporate the well known palm scanning technique as taught by Aoki in the biometric device of Otsubo in order to photograph the biometric information of any part of the hand, including fingers and palm. Claim 20, Aoki teaches a controller 100 disposed in the housing between the opening and the bottom surface side; and a power supply disposed in the housing between the opening and the bottom surface side (e.g. Fig. 6). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. 20250371910 Shen discloses a conventional imaging device. 20250338524 Nakamura discloses a conventional bioinformation acquisition method. 20250171057 Nakamura discloses a conventional bioinformation acquisition method. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to YOUNG LEE whose telephone number is (571)272-7334. The examiner can normally be reached 571-272-7334. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Y LEE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2485
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 30, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 09, 2025
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 19, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604005
VIDEO DECODING METHOD, VIDEO ENCODING METHOD, AND VIDEO DECODER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597255
SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS WITH POOL VISION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12587641
SELF-GUIDED INTRA INTERPOLATION FILTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587265
BACKHAUL LINK FOR A HIGH ALTITUDE PLATFORM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587683
PACKING DISPLACEMENT COMPONENT SAMPLE IN THE DISPLACEMENT VIDEO FRAME FOR DYNAMIC MESH CODING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
48%
Grant Probability
73%
With Interview (+25.5%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 418 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month