Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 19/004,847

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TREATMENT PLANNING WITH TOOTH MASS ANALYSIS

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Dec 30, 2024
Priority
Oct 27, 2021 — provisional 63/263,139 +3 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, PHONG X
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Align Technology Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
306 granted / 406 resolved
+15.4% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+24.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
417
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.6%
-30.4% vs TC avg
§103
58.0%
+18.0% vs TC avg
§102
12.7%
-27.3% vs TC avg
§112
17.1%
-22.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 406 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the claims at issue are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO internet Web site contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit http://www.uspto.gov/forms/. The filing date of the application will determine what form should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to http://www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claims 2-21 of the present application are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-5, 15-16, and 18-20 of the US Patent 12,220,288 (“the ‘288 patent” hereinafter). The following table shows in detail the correspondence between claim 2 of the present application and claim 1 of the ‘288 patent. The mappings for other claims are also shown, but in corresponding claim numbers only, for brevity purposes. Present Application Patent 12,220,288 2. A method comprising: receiving a plurality of digital representations of a plurality of intermediate tooth arrangements configured to adjust a patient's teeth from an initial tooth arrangement toward a target tooth arrangement, wherein the target tooth arrangement comprises a change in mass of at least one tooth relative to the initial tooth arrangement; outputting a first heatmap showing a difference in tooth mass between a first intermediate tooth arrangement of the plurality of intermediate tooth arrangements and the target tooth arrangement; outputting a second heatmap showing a difference in tooth mass between a second intermediate tooth arrangement of the plurality of intermediate tooth arrangements and the target tooth arrangement; and receiving a user input selecting the first intermediate tooth arrangement or the second intermediate tooth arrangement for use in a treatment plan based on a comparison between the first heatmap and the second heatmap. 1. A method comprising: receiving input data representing an initial tooth arrangement of a patient's teeth; determining a target tooth arrangement for the patient's teeth, wherein the target tooth arrangement comprises a change in mass of at least one tooth; generating a plurality of intermediate tooth arrangements configured to adjust the patient's teeth from the initial tooth arrangement toward the target tooth arrangement; generating instructions to output a first heatmap showing a difference in tooth mass between a first intermediate tooth arrangement of the plurality of intermediate tooth arrangements and the target tooth arrangement; generating instructions to output a second heatmap showing a difference in tooth mass between a second intermediate tooth arrangement of the plurality of intermediate tooth arrangements and the target tooth arrangement; and receiving a user input selecting the first intermediate tooth arrangement or the second intermediate tooth arrangement for use in a treatment plan based on a comparison between the first heatmap and the second heatmap. 3 2 4 3 5 4 6 5 7 15 8 16 9 18 10 19 11 20 12-21 1-5, 15-16, and 18-20 respectively. Although these claims are directed to a method, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention that the steps recited in these claims could be encoded as instructions that would be executed on a computer system comprising one or more processors and a memory so that the claimed method could be ported to a plurality of computer systems. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-21 are allowable if the above double patenting rejection is overcome. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art fails to teach or suggest a method for treatment planning with tooth mass analysis, the method comprising: (1) receiving a plurality of digital representations of a plurality of intermediate tooth arrangements configured to adjust a patient's teeth from an initial tooth arrangement toward a target tooth arrangement, wherein the target tooth arrangement comprises a change in mass of at least one tooth relative to the initial tooth arrangement; (2) outputting a first heatmap showing a difference in tooth mass between a first intermediate tooth arrangement of the plurality of intermediate tooth arrangements and the target tooth arrangement; (3) outputting a second heatmap showing a difference in tooth mass between a second intermediate tooth arrangement of the plurality of intermediate tooth arrangements and the target tooth arrangement; and (4) receiving a user input selecting the first intermediate tooth arrangement or the second intermediate tooth arrangement for use in a treatment plan based on a comparison between the first heatmap and the second heatmap. The prior art also fails to teach or suggest a system configured to implement the above steps. The followings are the closest prior art references found by the examiner: 1. Derakhshan et al., U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2016/0310235 A1 ("Derakhshan" hereinafter). Derakhshan discloses a method of orthodontic treatment planning comprising receiving, at a treatment planning tool, an initial tooth data set comprising an initial tooth arrangement, and generating a plurality of treatment plans to move teeth from the initial tooth arrangement, wherein each treatment plan comprises a plurality of orthodontic appliance treatment stages including a plurality of intermediate orthodontic appliance treatment stages (see Summary of the Invention; FIGS. 7-8, steps 710-720 and 810-820). Derakhshan further discloses simultaneously displaying, on a screen, at least two different intermediate treatment stages from at least two different treatment plans (or the same treatment plan) for comparison by the practitioner, including a first intermediate stage from a first treatment plan and a second intermediate stage from a second treatment plan, and discloses that the simultaneous display can superimpose a three-dimensional model of one stage over a three-dimensional model of the other stage, with the teeth shaded or colored differently for each stage so that the practitioner can see the difference between the stages (see FIG. 3C and accompanying description; FIG. 3B). Derakhshan further discloses receiving a selection of a final orthodontic appliance treatment stage based on the comparison of tooth positioning of the at least two different intermediate stages, made after displaying the stages to the practitioner (see Summary of the Invention; FIG. 7, step 740; FIG. 8, step 830). However, Derakhshan does not disclose that the target tooth arrangement comprises a change in mass of at least one tooth relative to the initial tooth arrangement, or that the comparative visualization of each candidate arrangement against the target is a heatmap of tooth mass. 2. Mundluru et al., The accuracy of three-dimensional prediction of soft tissue changes following the surgical correction of facial asymmetry: An innovative concept, 2017 (“Mundluru” hereinafter). Mundluru discloses using color-coded maps (Figs. 3–6) that compare a single predicted postoperative soft-tissue outcome against the single actual postoperative outcome. However, this is a validation study measuring how accurate the prediction software was, not a tool that generates multiple candidate treatment options and lets a user pick between them. There's no second candidate, and no user-selection step at all. Therefore, Mundluru cannot be combined with Derakhshan to cure the deficiency of "first heatmap vs. second heatmap → select first or second intermediate tooth arrangement" in Derakhshan. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PHONG X NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)270-1591. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8am - 5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, King Poon can be reached at (571)272-7440. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PHONG X NGUYEN/ Primary Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2617
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 30, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12737785
BILLBOARD SIMULATION AND ASSESSMENT SYSTEM
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12731339
Optimizing Views of Three-Dimensional Entities from Clusters of Public, Posed Images
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12710806
ON DEMAND CONTEXTUAL SUPPORT AGENT WITH SPATIAL AWARENESS
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12705816
GRAPHICS PROCESSORS
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12676091
SYNTHETIC IMAGES WITH ANIMATION OF PERCEIVED DEPTH
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+24.0%)
2y 9m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 406 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month