Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 19/007,352

CURVED END EFFECTOR FOR A MEDICAL CATHETER

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 31, 2024
Examiner
PREMRAJ, CATHERINE C
Art Unit
3794
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Biosense Webster (Israel) Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
56%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 56% of resolved cases
56%
Career Allowance Rate
118 granted / 209 resolved
-13.5% vs TC avg
Strong +49% interview lift
Without
With
+48.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 1m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
271
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
60.2%
+20.2% vs TC avg
§102
19.0%
-21.0% vs TC avg
§112
15.5%
-24.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 209 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Election/Restriction Restriction to one of the following inventions is required under 35 U.S.C. 121: I. Claims 1-13, drawn to an apparatus, classified in A61B5/287. II. Claims 14-20, drawn to a method of manufacture, classified in A61M25/0009. The inventions are independent or distinct, each from the other because: Inventions I and II are related as product and process of making. The inventions are distinct if either or both of the following can be shown: (1) that the process as claimed can be used to make another and materially different product or (2) that the product as claimed can be made by another and materially different process (MPEP § 806.05(f)). In the instant case the product as claimed may be made using a method attaching the flexible circuit to a monolithic, integrated framework comprising the insulating layer, rather than encapsulating the framework with a separate insulating layer. Restriction for examination purposes as indicated is proper because all the inventions listed in this action are independent or distinct for the reasons given above and there would be a serious search and/or examination burden if restriction were not required because one or more of the following reasons apply: (a) the inventions have acquired a separate status in the art in view of their different classification; (b) the inventions have acquired a separate status in the art due to their recognized divergent subject matter; (c) the inventions require a different field of search (for example, searching different classes/subclasses or electronic resources, or employing different search queries); (d) the prior art applicable to one invention would not likely be applicable to another invention; (e) the inventions are likely to raise different non-prior art issues under 35 U.S.C. 101 and/or 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph. During a telephone conversation with Scott Denion (Reg. No. 76,757) on 07/27/2026, a provisional election was made without traverse to prosecute the invention of Group I, claims 1-13. Affirmation of this election must be made by applicant in replying to this Office action. Claims 14-20 are withdrawn from further consideration by the examiner, 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a non-elected invention. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Fuentes-Ortega et al., (US 20210015551; hereinafter Fuentes). Regarding claim 1, Fuentes (Figure 6) discloses an end effector (one leaflet 400) having a length (element z shown in annotated Figure 6 below) extending along a longitudinal axis from a proximal end to a distal end, a width (element y shown in annotated Figure 6 below) extending along a horizontal axis perpendicular to the longitudinal axis, and a thickness (element x shown in annotated Figure 6 below) extending along a vertical axis perpendicular to the longitudinal axis and the horizontal axis (i.e. in the axis extending perpendicular to this page), the end effector (400) comprising: a flexible circuit (flex circuit) comprising a plurality of electrodes (250/260), ([0048], [0055]: flex circuit comprising the electrodes 250/260 on the flex circuit substrate material of each leaflet), the flexible circuit (flex circuit) disposed on an insulative material ([0055]: flex circuit substrate material, e.g., polyimide, polyether ether ketone, etc.) and each electrode of the plurality of electrodes (250/260) comprising a contact surface, the insulative material (flex circuit substrate material) being contiguous to the contact surface so that only the contact surfaces of at least a portion of the plurality of electrodes (250/260) are exposed to an ambient environment ([0043]); and a framework (framework formed of integral nitinol strips) at least partially encapsulated in the insulative material (flex circuit substrate material) and curved along the width in a direction along the vertical axis such that the end effector (400) comprises a curvature along its width from about the proximal end to about the distal end ([0054]-[0056], [0062], [0069]: as shown in Figure 2C and particularly paragraph [0056], the resilient material, i.e. nitinol, of each leaflet 210, which corresponds to each leaflet 400, is curved along the width in the vertical axis perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the device, i.e. directions x and y from annotated Figure 6 below, in the bulbous configuration of Figure 2C). PNG media_image1.png 312 740 media_image1.png Greyscale Annotated Figure 6 from the Fuentes reference Regarding claim 2, Fuentes discloses the end effector of claim 1, wherein the end effector (400) comprises the curvature along its width from about the proximal end to about the distal end ([0054]-[0055], [0062], [0069]), but fails to disclose the curvature comprising a radius (R) of about 8 millimeters to about 15 millimeters. However, It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Fuentes to include the curvature comprising a radius of about 8 millimeters to about 15 millimeters since it has been held that where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, discovering the optimum or workable ranges involves only routine skill in the art. MPEP 2144.05(I). Regarding claim 3, Fuentes (Figure 6) further discloses the radius of the curvature being uniform throughout the length of the end effector ([0062]: spheroid configuration). Regarding claim 4, Fuentes (Figure 6) further discloses the radius of the curvature increasing from the proximal end to the distal end ([0065]: tulip configuration). Regarding claim 5, Fuentes discloses the end effector of claim 4, but fails to disclose the radius of the curvature at the proximal end being approximately 4 millimeters. However, It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Fuentes to include the radius of the curvature at the proximal end being approximately 4 millimeters since the radius of curvature is simply a result-effective variable which determines the degree of curvature of the end effector and it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art. MPEP 2144.05(II)(B). Regarding claim 6, Fuentes (Figure 6) further discloses the framework (framework formed of integral nitinol strips) comprising a shape-memory material (nitinol) configured to return to a predefined-shape having the curvature at an activation temperature ([0075], [0087]). Regarding claim 7, Fuentes (Figure 6) further discloses the activation temperature being about 37 degrees Celsius ([0075], [0087]: human body temperature). Regarding claim 8, Fuentes (Figure 6) further discloses the shape-memory material comprising nitinol ([0054]-[0055], [0062], [0069], [0075]). Regarding claim 9, Fuentes (Figure 6) further discloses an outer surface of the insulative material (flex circuit substrate material) comprising a plurality of creases along the length of the end effector (400), ([0054]-[0055], [0062], [0069], [0075]: as shown in Figure 8B, when the end effector takes on the 3D configuration, there are creases at the proximal and distal ends of the insulative material). Regarding claim 10, Fuentes (Figure 6) further discloses an outer surface of the insulative material (flex circuit substrate material) being slanted (curved) between adjacent spines (410) of the framework (framework formed of integral nitinol strips), ([0054]-[0055], [0062], [0069]). Regarding claim 11, Fuentes (Figure 6) further discloses the insulative material (flex circuit substrate material) further defining a gap (430) between at least one surface of the flexible circuit (422) and an interior surface of the insulative material (flex circuit substrate material), ([0054]-[0055], [0062], [0069]). Regarding claim 12, Fuentes (Figure 6) further discloses a lumen (430) formed within the insulative material (flex circuit substrate material), ([0054]-[0055], [0062], [0069]). Regarding claim 13, Fuentes (Figure 6) further discloses the lumen (430) disposed adjacent to spines (410) of the framework (framework formed of integral nitinol strips), ([0054]-[0055], [0062], [0069]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CATHERINE PREMRAJ whose telephone number is (571)272-8013. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday: 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph Stoklosa can be reached at 571-272-1213. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /C.C.P./Examiner, Art Unit 3794 /EUN HWA KIM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3794
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 31, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12721563
MULTI-LAYERED CATHETER SHAFT CONSTRUCTION WITH EMBEDDED SINGLE AXIAL SENSORS, AND RELATED METHODS
5y 9m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12661175
MEDICAL DEVICE WITH A BILATERAL JAW CONFIGURATION FOR NERVE STIMULATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12642570
ABLATION CATHETER WITH STRAIN GAUGES
9y 8m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12642580
ELECTROSURGICAL DEVICES AND METHODS
4y 3m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12594035
ORAL APPLIANCE FOR THE TREATMENT OF SLEEP APNEA
3y 1m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
56%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+48.6%)
4y 1m (~2y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 209 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month