Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 19/007,374

FIXED RETAIL SCANNERS AND RELATED METHODS FOR DOCUMENT VALIDATION ASSIST IMPROVEMENTS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 31, 2024
Examiner
SABAH, HARIS
Art Unit
2682
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
DATALOGIC IP TECH, S.R.L.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
525 granted / 683 resolved
+14.9% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
706
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.4%
-30.6% vs TC avg
§103
60.9%
+20.9% vs TC avg
§102
18.1%
-21.9% vs TC avg
§112
6.8%
-33.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 683 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . 2. Claims 1-20 are pending in this application. Drawings 3. The drawing has been filed on 12/31/2024 are acceptable for examination purpose. Information Disclosure Statement 4. The information disclosure statement filed on 12/31/2024 is in compliance with the provision of the 37 CFR 1.97 and therefore has been considered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 5. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 6. Claims 1, 6-11, 14-15, 17-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Collins, Jr. et al. [hereafter Collins, Jr.], US Pub 2015/0348350. As to claim 1 [independent], Collins, Jr. teaches. a scanning system, comprising [0018]: a data reader comprising [0018]: at least one camera [fig. 1a, element “imager”; 0018] configured to capture images of an item [figs. 1a-d; abstract, 0018-0025 Collins, Jr. teaches that scanner comprising the camera with multiple light sources such as Ultraviolet (UV) light (i.e. non-visible light), Infrared (IR) light (i.e. non-visible light), and/or white light (i.e. visible light) illuminates the currency note to scan or captures currency images]; at least one visible illumination source [figs. 1a-d; abstract, 0018-0025 Collins, Jr. teaches that scanner comprising the camera with multiple light sources such as Ultraviolet (UV) light (i.e. non-visible light), Infrared (IR) light (i.e. non-visible light), and/or white light (i.e. visible light) illuminates the currency note to scan or captures currency images]; at least one non-visible illumination source [figs. 1a-d; abstract, 0018-0025 Collins, Jr. teaches that scanner comprising the camera with multiple light sources such as Ultraviolet (UV) light (i.e. non-visible light), Infrared (IR) light (i.e. non-visible light), and/or white light (i.e. visible light) illuminates the currency note to scan or captures currency images]; at least one processor configured to: control the exposure of the at least one camera and activate the at least one visible illumination source and the non-visible illumination source [figs. 1a-d; abstract, 0018-0025 Collins, Jr. teaches that the camera selectively illuminated with Ultraviolet (UV) light (i.e. non-visible light), Infrared (IR) light (i.e. non-visible light), and/or white light (i.e. visible light) in front of a camera, which is integrated into a scanner scan or captures currency images and then transmitted to display after each scan, alternately or one by one displaying each of the images of the scanned currency images for the user with different security features detected in each scanned images at least as shown in figs. 1a-c in order to validate or invalidate the currency]; decode optical symbols on the item from images captured during a decoding operational mode [figs. 1a-d; abstract, 0018-0025 Collins, Jr. teaches that the camera selectively illuminated with Ultraviolet (UV) light (i.e. non-visible light), Infrared (IR) light (i.e. non-visible light), and/or white light (i.e. visible light) in front of a camera, which is integrated into a scanner scan or captures currency images and then transmitted to display after each scan, alternately or one by one displaying each of the images of the scanned currency images for the user with different security features detected in each scanned images at least as shown in figs. 1a-c in order to validate or invalidate the currency]; and capture a first image under a first illumination condition using the at least one visible light source [figs. 1a-d; abstract, 0018-0025 Collins, Jr. teaches that the camera selectively illuminated with Ultraviolet (UV) light (i.e. non-visible light), Infrared (IR) light (i.e. non-visible light), and/or white light (i.e. visible light) in front of a camera, which is integrated into a scanner scan or captures currency images and then transmitted to display after each scan, alternately or one by one displaying each of the images of the scanned currency images for the user with different security features detected in each scanned images at least as shown in figs. 1a-c in order to validate or invalidate the currency], a second image under a second illumination condition using the at least one non-visible light source during a document validation assist mode [figs. 1a-d; abstract, 0018-0025 Collins, Jr. teaches that the camera selectively illuminated with Ultraviolet (UV) light (i.e. non-visible light), Infrared (IR) light (i.e. non-visible light), and/or white light (i.e. visible light) in front of a camera, which is integrated into a scanner scan or captures currency images and then transmitted to display after each scan, alternately or one by one displaying each of the images of the scanned currency images for the user with different security features detected in each scanned images at least as shown in figs. 1a-c in order to validate or invalidate the currency]; and an electronic display operably coupled to the data reader to receive the images from the data reader during the document validation assist mode [figs. 1a-d; abstract, 0018-0025 Collins, Jr. teaches that the camera selectively illuminated with Ultraviolet (UV) light (i.e. non-visible light), Infrared (IR) light (i.e. non-visible light), and/or white light (i.e. visible light) in front of a camera, which is integrated into a scanner scan or captures currency images and then transmitted to display after each scan, alternately or one by one displaying each of the images of the scanned currency images for the user with different security features detected in each scanned images at least as shown in figs. 1a-c in order to validate or invalidate the currency], the electronic display configured to display the first and second images in an alternating fashion at a frequency slower than a minimum flicker fusion frequency for human vision [figs. 1a-d; abstract, 0018-0025 Collins, Jr. teaches that the camera selectively illuminated with Ultraviolet (UV) light (i.e. non-visible light), Infrared (IR) light (i.e. non-visible light), and/or white light (i.e. visible light) in front of a camera, which is integrated into a scanner scan or captures currency images and then transmitted to display after each scan, alternately or one by one displaying each of the images of the scanned currency images for the user with different security features detected in each scanned images at least as shown in figs. 1a-c in order to validate or invalidate the currency]. . As to claim 6 [dependent from claim 1], Collins, Jr. teaches wherein the frequency for alternating the images controlled by a manual user input for switching between the images [0051 Collins, Jr. teaches that the currency validator presents the image in a screen of a display for validation, such as by a clerk operating a checkout station]. As to claim 7 [dependent from claim 1], Collins, Jr. teaches wherein the data reader is a fixed retail scanner including a top-down reader operably coupled thereto, the top-down reader including the at least one camera [figs. 1a-d; 0018-0019], the at least one visible illumination source, and the at least one non-visible illumination source used to capture images during the document validation assist mode [figs. 1a-d; abstract, 0018-0025 Collins, Jr. teaches that the camera selectively illuminated with Ultraviolet (UV) light (i.e. non-visible light), Infrared (IR) light (i.e. non-visible light), and/or white light (i.e. visible light) in front of a camera, which is integrated into a scanner scan or captures currency images and then transmitted to display after each scan, alternately or one by one displaying each of the images of the scanned currency images for the user with different security features detected in each scanned images at least as shown in figs. 1a-c in order to validate or invalidate the currency]. As to claim 8 [dependent from claim 1], Collins, Jr. teaches wherein the data reader is one of a fixed retail scanner, a presentation scanner, a mobile or handheld scanner, or a wearable scanner [0018]. As to claim 9 [dependent from claim 1], Collins, Jr. teaches wherein the visible illumination source produces at least one of red light or white light, and wherein the non-visible illumination source produces at least one of infrared (IR) or ultraviolet (UV) light [figs. 1a-d; abstract, 0018-0025 Collins, Jr. teaches that the camera selectively illuminated with Ultraviolet (UV) light (i.e. non-visible light), Infrared (IR) light (i.e. non-visible light), and/or white light (i.e. visible light) in front of a camera, which is integrated into a scanner scan or captures currency images and then transmitted to display after each scan, alternately or one by one displaying each of the images of the scanned currency images for the user with different security features detected in each scanned images at least as shown in figs. 1a-c in order to validate or invalidate the currency]. As to claim 10 [independent], Collins, Jr. teaches a method of operating a scanning system to perform a document validation assist mode, the method comprising [figs. 1a-d; abstract, 0018-0025 Collins, Jr. teaches that the camera selectively illuminated with Ultraviolet (UV) light (i.e. non-visible light), Infrared (IR) light (i.e. non-visible light), and/or white light (i.e. visible light) in front of a camera, which is integrated into a scanner scan or captures currency images and then transmitted to display after each scan, for alternately or one by one displaying each of the images of the scanned currency images for the user in order to validate or invalidate the currency]: capturing a first image under a first illumination condition of non-visible light [figs. 1a-d; abstract, 0018-0025 Collins, Jr. teaches that the camera selectively illuminated with Ultraviolet (UV) light (i.e. non-visible light), Infrared (IR) light (i.e. non-visible light), and/or white light (i.e. visible light) in front of a camera, which is integrated into a scanner scan or captures currency images and then transmitted to display after each scan, for alternately or one by one displaying each of the images of the scanned currency images for the user in order to validate or invalidate the currency]; capturing a second image under a second illumination condition of visible light [figs. 1a-d; abstract, 0018-0025 Collins, Jr. teaches that the camera selectively illuminated with Ultraviolet (UV) light (i.e. non-visible light), Infrared (IR) light (i.e. non-visible light), and/or white light (i.e. visible light) in front of a camera, which is integrated into a scanner scan or captures currency images and then transmitted to display after each scan, for alternately or one by one displaying each of the images of the scanned currency images for the user in order to validate or invalidate the currency]; transmitting the first image and the second image from a data reader to a connected electronic display [figs. 1a-d; abstract, 0018-0025 Collins, Jr. teaches that the camera selectively illuminated with Ultraviolet (UV) light (i.e. non-visible light), Infrared (IR) light (i.e. non-visible light), and/or white light (i.e. visible light) in front of a camera, which is integrated into a scanner scan or captures currency images and then transmitted to display after each scan, for alternately or one by one displaying each of the images of the scanned currency images for the user in order to validate or invalidate the currency]; and alternatingly displaying the first and second images on the connected electronic display at a rate less than a minimum flicker fusion frequency for human vision [figs. 1a-d; abstract, 0018-0025 Collins, Jr. teaches that the camera selectively illuminated with Ultraviolet (UV) light (i.e. non-visible light), Infrared (IR) light (i.e. non-visible light), and/or white light (i.e. visible light) in front of a camera, which is integrated into a scanner scan or captures currency images and then transmitted to display after each scan, alternately or one by one displaying each of the images of the scanned currency images for the user in order to validate or invalidate the currency]. As to claim 11 [dependent from claim 10], Collins, Jr. teaches wherein the visible light is at least one of a red light or a white light, and the non-visible light at least one of infrared (IR) or ultraviolet (UV) light [figs. 1a-d; abstract, 0018-0025 Collins, Jr. teaches that the camera selectively illuminated with Ultraviolet (UV) light (i.e. non-visible light), Infrared (IR) light (i.e. non-visible light), and/or white light (i.e. visible light) in front of a camera, which is integrated into a scanner scan or captures currency images]. As to claim 14 [dependent from claim 10], Collins, Jr. teaches continuously capturing first images and second images under the respective illumination conditions during the document validation assist mode [figs. 1a-d; abstract, 0018-0025 Collins, Jr. teaches that the camera selectively illuminated with Ultraviolet (UV) light (i.e. non-visible light), Infrared (IR) light (i.e. non-visible light), and/or white light (i.e. visible light) in front of a camera, which is integrated into a scanner scan or captures currency images]. As to claim 15 [dependent from claim 10], Collins, Jr. teaches capturing a third image under a third illumination condition of non-visible light, wherein transmitting and alternatingly displaying include the third image, and wherein the first illumination condition is IR light and the third illumination condition is UV light [figs. 1a-d; abstract, 0018-0025 Collins, Jr. teaches that the camera selectively illuminated with Ultraviolet (UV) light (i.e. non-visible light), Infrared (IR) light (i.e. non-visible light), and/or white light (i.e. visible light) in front of a camera, which is integrated into a scanner scan or captures currency images and then transmitted to display after each scan, alternately or one by one displaying each of the images of the scanned currency images for the user in order to validate or invalidate the currency]. As to claim 17 [dependent from claim 10], Collins, Jr. teaches wherein the first image and the second image are transmitted as a single set of images, and the alternatingly displaying switches back and forth between the same first and second images of the single set of images [figs. 1a-d; abstract, 0018-0025 Collins, Jr. teaches that the camera selectively illuminated with Ultraviolet (UV) light (i.e. non-visible light), Infrared (IR) light (i.e. non-visible light), and/or white light (i.e. visible light) in front of a camera, which is integrated into a scanner scan or captures currency images and then transmitted to display after each scan, alternately or one by one displaying each of the images of the scanned currency images for the user in order to validate or invalidate the currency]. As to claim 18 [dependent from claim 10], Collins, Jr. teaches analyzing, via a processor of the data reader, the first image and second image to detect differences therebetween; annotating the images transmitted to the electronic display; and providing an indication to the user of the detected differences [figs. 1a-d; abstract, 0018-0025 Collins, Jr. teaches that the camera selectively illuminated with Ultraviolet (UV) light (i.e. non-visible light), Infrared (IR) light (i.e. non-visible light), and/or white light (i.e. visible light) in front of a camera, which is integrated into a scanner scan or captures currency images and then transmitted to display after each scan, alternately or one by one displaying each of the images of the scanned currency images for the user with different security features detected in each scanned images at least as shown in figs. 1a-c in order to validate or invalidate the currency]. As to claim 19 [dependent from claim 18], Collins, Jr. teaches wherein providing an indication to the user includes displaying a visual indicator around or in proximity to the detected differences [figs. 1a-d; abstract, 0018-0025 Collins, Jr. teaches that the camera selectively illuminated with Ultraviolet (UV) light (i.e. non-visible light), Infrared (IR) light (i.e. non-visible light), and/or white light (i.e. visible light) in front of a camera, which is integrated into a scanner scan or captures currency images and then transmitted to display after each scan, alternately or one by one displaying each of the images of the scanned currency images for the user with different security features detected in each scanned images at least as shown in figs. 1a-c in order to validate or invalidate the currency]. As to claim 20 [independent], Collins, Jr. teaches a method of operating a scanning system to perform a document validation assist mode, the method comprising[figs. 1a-d; abstract, 0018-0025 Collins, Jr. teaches that the camera selectively illuminated with Ultraviolet (UV) light (i.e. non-visible light), Infrared (IR) light (i.e. non-visible light), and/or white light (i.e. visible light) in front of a camera, which is integrated into a scanner scan or captures currency images and then transmitted to display after each scan, for alternately or one by one displaying each of the images of the scanned currency images for the user in order to validate or invalidate the currency]: capturing a first image under a first illumination condition that shows at least one security feature present on the document [figs. 1a-d; abstract, 0018-0025 Collins, Jr. teaches that the camera selectively illuminated with Ultraviolet (UV) light (i.e. non-visible light), Infrared (IR) light (i.e. non-visible light), and/or white light (i.e. visible light) in front of a camera, which is integrated into a scanner scan or captures currency images and then transmitted to display after each scan, alternately or one by one displaying each of the images of the scanned currency images for the user with different security features detected in each scanned images at least as shown in figs. 1a-c in order to validate or invalidate the currency]; capturing a second image under a second illumination condition that does not show the at least one security feature present on the document [figs. 1a-d; abstract, 0018-0025 Collins, Jr. teaches that the camera selectively illuminated with Ultraviolet (UV) light (i.e. non-visible light), Infrared (IR) light (i.e. non-visible light), and/or white light (i.e. visible light) in front of a camera, which is integrated into a scanner scan or captures currency images and then transmitted to display after each scan, alternately or one by one displaying each of the images of the scanned currency images for the user with different security features detected in each scanned images at least as shown in figs. 1a-c in order to validate or invalidate the currency]; transmitting the first image and the second image from a data reader to a connected electronic display [figs. 1a-d; abstract, 0018-0025 Collins, Jr. teaches that the camera selectively illuminated with Ultraviolet (UV) light (i.e. non-visible light), Infrared (IR) light (i.e. non-visible light), and/or white light (i.e. visible light) in front of a camera, which is integrated into a scanner scan or captures currency images and then transmitted to display after each scan, alternately or one by one displaying each of the images of the scanned currency images for the user with different security features detected in each scanned images at least as shown in figs. 1a-c in order to validate or invalidate the currency]; and alternatingly displaying the first and second images on the connected electronic display at a rate less than a minimum flicker fusion frequency for human vision to allow a user to distinguish between the images and identify the at least one security feature [figs. 1a-d; abstract, 0018-0025 Collins, Jr. teaches that the camera selectively illuminated with Ultraviolet (UV) light (i.e. non-visible light), Infrared (IR) light (i.e. non-visible light), and/or white light (i.e. visible light) in front of a camera, which is integrated into a scanner scan or captures currency images and then transmitted to display after each scan, alternately or one by one displaying each of the images of the scanned currency images for the user with different security features detected in each scanned images at least as shown in figs. 1a-c in order to validate or invalidate the currency]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 7. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 8. Claims 12-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Collins, Jr. et al. [hereafter Collins, Jr.], US Pub 2015/0348350 in view of Crooks et al. [hereafter Crooks], US Pub 2018/0247292. As to claim 12 [dependent from claim 10], Collins, Jr. teaches image balancing the first image and the second image so that the apparent brightness of the document is the same under the first and second illumination conditions. Crooks teaches image balancing the first image and the second image so that the apparent brightness of the document is the same under the first and second illumination conditions [0039 Crooks teaches that the multiple cameras 240, 242 at least acquire at least first & second images to go through further image processing including adjusting color, for example altering or applying white balance, separating colors, for example by applying a de-Bayer filter, and adjusting brightness]. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate Crooks teaching to adjust brightness of the document is the same under the first and second illumination conditions to modify Collins, Jr.’s teaching to receive first & second images from multiple cameras, where the images from each device captured at various illumination sources and exposure levels, and the images are sorted based on illumination and exposure levels for distribution to image processing services that each perform task with regard to a received image. The first & second images are presented to respective services for which they are sorted. The suggestion/motivation for doing so would have been benefitted to the user to provide scanner that processes and sorts images in a centralized task to minimize duplication of processor usage to reduce processing load. As to claim 13 [dependent from claim 12], Crooks teaches wherein the image balancing includes at least one of white balance, color correction, conversion of the first and second images to monochrome images, or any combination thereof [0039 Crooks teaches that the multiple cameras 240, 242 at least acquire at least first & second images to go through further image processing including adjusting color, for example altering or applying white balance, separating colors, for example by applying a de-Bayer filter, and adjusting brightness]. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate Crooks teaching to adjust brightness of the document is the same under the first and second illumination conditions to modify Collins, Jr.’s teaching to receive first & second images from multiple cameras, where the images from each device captured at various illumination sources and exposure levels, and the images are sorted based on illumination and exposure levels for distribution to image processing services that each perform task with regard to a received image. The first & second images are presented to respective services for which they are sorted. The suggestion/motivation for doing so would have been benefitted to the user to provide scanner that processes and sorts images in a centralized task to minimize duplication of processor usage to reduce processing load. Allowable Subject Matter 9. Claims 2-5, 16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. 10. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The dependent claim 2 is allowable over the prior arts of record (or cited or listed above) since the cited references taken individually or in combination fails to particularly anticipate or disclose or suggest the claim limitations recited “wherein the frequency for alternating the images is at or less than 15 Hz”, in combination with all other limitations as claimed. The dependent claim 3 is allowable over the prior arts of record (or cited or listed above) since the cited references taken individually or in combination fails to particularly anticipate or disclose or suggest the claim limitations recited “wherein the frequency for alternating the images is in a range between 5 Hz and 15 Hz”, in combination with all other limitations as claimed. The dependent claim 4 is allowable over the prior arts of record (or cited or listed above) since the cited references taken individually or in combination fails to particularly anticipate or disclose or suggest the claim limitations recited “wherein the motor and the torsional spring pull the belt in a same direction”, in combination with all other limitations as claimed. The dependent claim 5 is allowable over the prior arts of record (or cited or listed above) since the cited references taken individually or in combination fails to particularly anticipate or disclose or suggest the claim limitations recited “wherein the frequency for alternating the images is in at or less than 5 Hz”, in combination with all other limitations as claimed. The dependent claim 15 is allowable over the prior arts of record (or cited or listed above) since the cited references taken individually or in combination fails to particularly anticipate or disclose or suggest the claim limitations recited “wherein the motor and the torsional spring pull the belt in a same direction”, in combination with all other limitations as claimed. The dependent claim 16 is allowable over the prior arts of record (or cited or listed above) since the cited references taken individually or in combination fails to particularly anticipate or disclose or suggest the claim limitations recited “capturing a third image under a third illumination condition of non-visible light; and superimposing the first and the third image as a single image to be alternatingly displayed with the second image, wherein the first illumination condition is IR light and the third illumination condition is UV light”, in combination with all other limitations as claimed. Conclusion 11. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HARIS SABAH whose telephone number is (571)270-3917. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday/Friday from 9:00AM to 5:30PM EST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Benny Tieu, can be reached on (571)272-7490. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. The Examiner’s personal fax number is (571)270-4917. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /HARIS SABAH/Examiner, Art Unit 2682
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 31, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 31, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12705889
COMPUTER VISION-BASED SURGICAL WORKFLOW RECOGNITION SYSTEM USING NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING TECHNIQUES TO IDENTIFY SURGICAL ACTIONS IN SURGICAL VIDEO, AND AN OBJECT DETECTION MODULE DETECTING A TOOL LOCATION
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12700090
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT APPARATUS, METHOD, AND PROGRAM AND INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, METHOD, AND PROGRAM
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12694250
PRINTER CONVERTING CHARACTER CODE INCLUDED IN PRINT DATA INTO CHARACTER CODE OF PRESCRIBED CHARACTER ENCODING SYSTEM TO GENERATE RASTER DATA
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12693817
SYSTEM, MANAGEMENT SERVER, AND CONTROL METHOD FOR MANAGEMENT SERVER
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12694579
MEDICAL IMAGE PRIVACY PRESERVATION VIA IMAGE SYNTHESIS AND FILTRATION
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+15.9%)
2y 8m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 683 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month