Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 30, 2026
Application No. 19/007,777

STATOR OF ROTATING ELECTRICAL MACHINE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jan 02, 2025
Priority
Jan 16, 2024 — JP 2024-004669
Examiner
STEFANON, JUSTIN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Toyota Motor Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
51%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 51% of resolved cases
51%
Career Allowance Rate
95 granted / 187 resolved
-9.2% vs TC avg
Strong +48% interview lift
Without
With
+48.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
242
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
40.0%
+0.0% vs TC avg
§102
32.4%
-7.6% vs TC avg
§112
25.5%
-14.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 187 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 01/12/2025 and 05/29/2026 are being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "high thermal conductivity portion" in line 8. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. The term “high thermal conductivity” in claim 1 is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term “high thermal conductivity” is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. The specification provides examples, e.g.: contacting with the coil or applying a heat dissipation material, but no definition. It is unclear whether the claimed property is accomplished by providing different materials, changing the geometry or density of a single material, or via differing amounts of contact and/or exposure of different parts of the material, which may be inherent properties of any prior art structure. Claim 2 recites the limitation "high thermal conductivity portion" in lines 2 and 4. The term “high thermal conductivity” in claim 1 is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term “high thermal conductivity” is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by SAWAHATA - WO 2020161999. Regarding claim 1, SAWAHATA discloses a stator 10 of rotating electrical machine, the stator 10 comprising: a stator core 11; and a stator coil 13 wound around the stator core 11, wherein the stator coil 13 is made of a plurality of segment coils 131/132, the plurality of segment coils 131/132 is configured of a first segment coil 131, a second segment coil 132, and a coupling member 133 that couples the first segment coil 131 and the second segment coil 132, a slot paper 15/31 that has an insulating property is wound around the stator coil 13, and the slot paper 15/31 has a high thermal conductivity portion at a position corresponding to the coupling member 133 (i.e. in [Example 6], the embodiment of Fig. 20, the insulating paper 31 at the coupling member is provided with a foaming agent, inherently creating a different thermal conductivity from the paper 15, which fills the gap and adheres to the stator slot 12, thereby inherently raising conductivity compared to sections 15 not contacting the stator slot). PNG media_image1.png 579 558 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, SAWAHATA discloses the stator 10 according to claim 1, wherein: the slot paper 31 has the high thermal conductivity portion provided in a band shape in a radial direction of the stator core 11 (Fig. 20; the coating of the bar creates a band shape as broadly claimed); and the high thermal conductivity portion 31 has a higher thermal conductivity than a portion 15 other than the high thermal conductivity portion in the slot paper 34 (i.e. the sections 31 with foaming agent fill the gap and adheres to the stator slot 12, thereby inherently raising conductivity compared to sections 15 not contacting the stator slot). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US-20060163952-A1 Kashihara discloses composite materials in slot insulating sheets; US-20190222087-A1 MATSUMOTO discloses varying thickness of slot insulation; US-20210249926-A1 ENOMOTO discloses varying thickness of slot papers; US-20230087038-A1 SUZUKI discloses multi-part slot papers with holes; WO-2019138693-A1 IWAKI discloses varying thickness of slot papers. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JUSTIN STEFANON whose telephone number is (703)756-4648. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday and alternate Fridays 8AM - 5PM EDT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Oluseye Iwarere can be reached at (571) 270-5112. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JUSTIN STEFANON/Examiner, Art Unit 2834 /OLUSEYE IWARERE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 02, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12494684
ROTOR OF AN ELECTRIC MACHINE
2y 3m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Patent 12451742
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR COOLING A ROTOR ASSEMBLY
3y 2m to grant Granted Oct 21, 2025
Patent 12316190
CASE STRUCTURE OF IN-WHEEL MOTOR
2y 10m to grant Granted May 27, 2025
Patent 9650015
BELT RETRACTOR FOR A VEHICLE SAFETY BELT
2y 8m to grant Granted May 16, 2017
Patent 9635986
SPINDLE AND ADAPTER FOR ROLL PAPER PRODUCT DISPENSERS
5y 6m to grant Granted May 02, 2017
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
51%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+48.3%)
3y 2m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 187 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month