Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 19/007,936

BITSTREAM SYNTAX FOR ADAPTIVE LINEAR WAVELET TRANSFORM

Non-Final OA §102§OTHER
Filed
Jan 02, 2025
Priority
Jan 02, 2024 — provisional 63/617,014
Examiner
BECK, LERON
Art Unit
2487
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Tencent America LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
683 granted / 859 resolved
+21.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
910
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
84.7%
+44.7% vs TC avg
§102
2.6%
-37.4% vs TC avg
§112
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 859 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §OTHER
-20Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-7, 10-16, 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102A2 as being anticipated by US 20250119581 A1-Hooda et al (Hereinafter referred to as “Hooda”).. Regarding claim 1, Hooda discloses a method of mesh decoding (fig. 12), comprising: receiving a bitstream that includes coded information of a mesh frame ([0048]); parsing a syntax element from the bitstream ([0240], wherein extracting syntax from the bitstream), the syntax element indicating whether an adaptive linear wavelet transform is used (Table 1; [0192-0196])), the adaptive linear wavelet transform applying different weight values to different neighboring vertices of a vertex in a wavelet transform of attribute values associated with vertices of the mesh frame ([0192-0196]); and reconstructing, when the syntax element indicates a use of the adaptive linear wavelet transform, at least a first vertex in the vertices of the mesh frame according to the adaptive linear wavelet transform ([0032], wherein reconstruct the base mesh (vertices)). Regardinng claim 2, Hooda discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the syntax element is a one-bit flag ([0192]). Regarding claim 3, Hooda discloses the method of claim 1, further comprising: reconstructing, when the syntax element indicates no use of the adaptive linear wavelet transform, the first vertex with same weight values applied to different neighboring vertices of the first vertex ([0033]). Regarding claim 4, Hooda discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the attribute values comprise displacement vectors associated with the vertices in the mesh frame ([0054]). Regarding claim 5, Hooda discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the reconstructing comprises: determining a first weight value to weight a first detail coefficient associated with a first neighboring vertex of the first vertex based on a first distance between the first neighboring vertex and the first vertex ([0114-0125]); and updating a value associated with the first vertex according to the first detail coefficient that is weighted with the first weight value ([0125-0127; 0168]). Regarding claim 6, Hooda discloses the method of claim 5, wherein the first weight value is calculated based on a reciprocal of the first distance between the first neighboring vertex and the first vertex ([0125-0127]). Regarding claim 7, Hooda discloses the method of claim 5, wherein the first weight value is calculated based on a counting number of different neighboring vertices of the first vertex ([0259]). Regarding claim 10, Hooda discloses the method of claim 1, further comprising: extracting, from the bitstream, at least a first weighting coefficient for an update filter in the wavelet transform of the attribute values and a second weighting coefficient used for a prediction filter in the wavelet transform of the attribute values ([0146]). Regarding claim 11, analyses are analogous to those presented for claim 1 and are applicable for claim 11 (encoding performs the opposite of decoding). Regarding claim 12, analyses are analogous to those presented for claim 2 and are applicable for claim 12. Regarding claim 13, analyses are analogous to those presented for claim 4 and are applicable for claim 13. Regarding claim 14, analyses are analogous to those presented for claim 5 and are applicable for claim 14. Regarding claim 15, analyses are analogous to those presented for claim 6 and are applicable for claim 15. Regarding claim 16, analyses are analogous to those presented for claim 7 and are applicable for claim 16. Regarding claim 19, analyses are analogous to those presented for claim 10 and are applicable for claim 19. Regarding claim 20, analyses are analogous to those presented for claim 1 and are applicable for claim 20. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 8-9, 17-18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LERON BECK whose telephone number is (571)270-1175. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8 am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Czekaj can be reached at (571) 272-7327. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. LERON . BECK Examiner Art Unit 2487 /LERON BECK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2487
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 02, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §OTHER
Apr 21, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12634466
WEIGHTED SAMPLE PREDICTION FOR GEOMETRIC PARTITIONING MODE
1y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12621461
CODING AFFINE MOTION MODELS FOR VIDEO CODING
2y 1m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12615366
LOW FREQUENCY NON-SEPARABLE TRANSFORM SIGNALING IN VIDEO CODING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12610090
METHOD OF PARTITIONING VIDEO DATA, DEVICE FOR DECODING VIDEO DATA, AND DEVICE FOR ENCODING VIDEO DATA
1y 4m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12610047
CODING METHOD AND DECODER
1y 4m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+11.7%)
2y 7m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 859 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month