Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 22, 2026
Application No. 19/007,960

INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY RECORDING MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 02, 2025
Priority
Feb 14, 2024 — JP 2024-020081
Examiner
VO, QUANG N
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Ricoh Company, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
463 granted / 637 resolved
+12.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
670
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.0%
-30.0% vs TC avg
§103
58.9%
+18.9% vs TC avg
§102
22.0%
-18.0% vs TC avg
§112
6.7%
-33.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 637 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a1) as being anticipated by Takahashi (US 2021/0122155 A1). Regarding claim 1, Takahashi discloses an information processing apparatus comprising circuitry configured to (e.g., the inkjet apparatus 1 includes mechanical components such as a main scanning motor 8, a gear 9, a pressure roller 10, a timing belt 11, and a guide rod 12. The inkjet apparatus 1 reciprocates an ink carriage 5 in a main scanning direction A with such mechanical components, paragraph 37): obtain a measurement result of an amount of ink drop discharged from one or more nozzles of an inkjet head in response to receiving a signal for starting a restriction on a total amount of ink drop (e.g., The drive control board 18 performs control such as inputting a drive waveform to the head module 15 through, e.g., the cable 19. The head module 15 discharges liquid according to the drive waveform, paragraph 47); create a table used for converting a gradation value into the amount of ink drop based on the measurement result of the amount of ink drop (e.g., Accordingly, the drive control board 18 includes a digital/analog (D/A) converter, an operational amplifier, an electrolytic capacitor, an electronic circuit such as a field-programmable gate array (FPGA), and a current amplification device in order to generate a drive waveform corresponding to the characteristics of each head module 15, paragraphs 48, 51); and restrict a total amount of ink drop corresponding to the gradation value using the table (e.g., the drive-waveform-data storage device 107 stores data indicating a drive waveform for driving the head module 15 to cause the head unit to discharge liquid, paragraph 77, 82). Regarding claim 2, Takahashi discloses wherein the circuitry is configured to obtain the measurement result of the amount of ink drop discharged from all nozzles used in printing (e.g., FIG. 15 is a diagram illustrating an example of control for correcting the size of liquid. For example, in the case of image data for instructing an image to be formed to have a uniform density, the size of liquid (hereinafter, simply referred to as “size”) to be discharged by a head unit is set to be consistently a small droplet SZ1 in a state before the correction is performed, paragraphs 126, 127). Regarding claim 3, Takahashi discloses wherein the circuitry is configured to obtain the measurement result of the amount of ink drop corresponding to a desired gradation value (e.g., the size may be corrected based on the deviation amount. That is, when the deviation amount is a large value equal to or larger than a certain value, the size may be corrected from the small droplet SZ1 to, e.g., a large droplet, paragraph 130). Regarding claim 4, Takahashi discloses wherein the circuitry is configured to: obtain the measurement result of the amount of ink drop a plurality of times; and create the table based on an average value of the measurement results of the amount of ink drop (e.g., FIG. 15 is a diagram illustrating an example of control for correcting the size of liquid. For example, in the case of image data for instructing an image to be formed to have a uniform density, the size of liquid (hereinafter, simply referred to as “size”) to be discharged by a head unit is set to be consistently a small droplet SZ1 in a state before the correction is performed, paragraphs 126, 127). Regarding claim 5, Takahashi discloses wherein the circuitry is configured to obtain the measurement result of the amount of ink drop corresponding to a specific gradation value specified on a user interface (UI) (e.g., FIG. 15 is a diagram illustrating an example of control for correcting the size of liquid. For example, in the case of image data for instructing an image to be formed to have a uniform density, the size of liquid (hereinafter, simply referred to as “size”) to be discharged by a head unit is set to be consistently a small droplet SZ1 in a state before the correction is performed, paragraph 126). Regarding claim 6, Takahashi discloses wherein the circuitry is configured to obtain the measurement result of the amount of ink drop for a number of times of measurement specified on a user interface (UI) (e.g., it is assumed that an image is formed with the size of the small droplet SZ1 at any of the first measurement position PS1, the second measurement position PS2, and the third measurement position PS3, paragraph 127). Regarding claim 7, Takahashi discloses wherein the circuitry is further configured to, after the amount of ink drop is measured, display, on a display, a change in ink amount, which is a difference between the measurement result of the amount of ink drop currently obtained and the measurement result of the amount of ink drop previously obtained (e.g., FIG. 16 is a diagram of an example of a case in which the size of liquid is corrected. For example, in the second-round pass, control is performed so that the size used at the second measurement position PS2 is corrected to a medium droplet SZ2, paragraph 129). Regarding claim 8, Takahashi discloses wherein the circuitry is configured to display, on the display, a message used for determining a measurement condition for measuring the amount of ink drop for a next time based on the change in ink amount (e.g., paragraphs 86, 87). Regarding claim 9, claim 9 is an information processing method reciting the same or similar claim limitations or features as recited in claim 1. Therefore, claim 9 is rejected as set forth above as claim 1. Regarding claim 10, claim 10 is a non-transitory recording medium claim reciting the same or similar claim limitations or features as recited in claim 1. Therefore, claim 10 is rejected as set forth above as claim 1. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted to later than the payment of the Issue Fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the Issue Fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statements of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to QUANG N VO whose telephone number is (571)270-1121. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 7AM-4PM, EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Abderrahim Merouan can be reached at 571-270-5254. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /QUANG N VO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2683
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 02, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12762658
METHOD FOR TRAINING LIGHT FILLING MODEL, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND RELATED DEVICE THEREOF
2y 9m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12762368
PRINTING SYSTEM, INSTRUCTION APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD OF INSTRUCTION APPARATUS, AND PROGRAM
2y 7m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12761847
INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD FOR THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12755340
TONE MAPPING VIA DYNAMIC HISTOGRAM MATCHING
3y 4m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12750453
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+6.1%)
3y 0m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 637 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month