Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/008,545

FLEXIBLE PRINTED CIRCUIT AND BATTERY PACK

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 02, 2025
Priority
Aug 27, 2024 — CN 2024220868980
Examiner
ESTRADA, ANGEL R
Art Unit
2847
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Guangdong Mingji Hi-Tech Electronics Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
43%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
1178 granted / 1377 resolved
+17.5% vs TC avg
Minimal -43% lift
Without
With
+-42.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1407
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
37.3%
-2.7% vs TC avg
§102
54.4%
+14.4% vs TC avg
§112
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1377 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 2 and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(2) as being anticipated by Liu et al (US 12,727,085; hereinafter Liu). Regarding claim 1, Liu discloses a flexible printed circuit (see figure 1) consisting of a flexible cable (100a), wherein a window portion (column 7 line 64-column 8 line 18; first, second and third openings) is formed in a middle of the flexible cable (100a), and a flexible die-cutting circuit (400) is electrically connected to the window portion (column 7 line 64-column 8 line 18). Regarding claim 2, Liu discloses the flexible printed circuit (see figure 1), wherein the flexible cable (100a) is a flexible flat cable (see abstract). Regarding claim 5, Liu discloses a battery pack, comprising the flexible printed circuit (100a; column 1 lines 13-26; battery management system). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 3 and 4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over (US 12,727,085; hereinafter Liu). Regarding claim 3, Liu discloses the flexible printed circuit (see figure 1), wherein the flexible die-cutting circuit (400) or a small flexible printed circuit is electrically connected to the window portion (column 7 line 64-column 8 line 18; first, second and third openings); but Liu lacks the window portion being rectangular and having a length of 4.3-8.3 mm and a width of 0.8-1.8 mm. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to make the window portion rectangular and having a length of 4.3-8.3 mm and a width of 0.8-1.8 mm , since such a modification would have involved a mere change in the shape of a component. Where the instant specification and evidence of record fail to attribute any significance (novel or unexpected results) to a particular shape, a change of shape is generally recognized as being within the level of ordinary skill in the art. In re Dailey, 357 F.2d 669, 149 USPQ 47 (CCPA 1966). Furthermore, A change in size is also generally recognized as being within the level of ordinary skill in the art. In re Rose, 105 USPQ 237 (CCPA 1955). Regarding claim 4, the modified Liu discloses the claimed invention except for the window portion having a length of 6.3 mm and a width of 1.3 mm. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to make the window portion having a length of 6.3 mm and a width of 1.3 mm, since such a modification would have involved a mere change in the size of a component. A change in size is generally recognized as being within the level of ordinary skill in the art. In re Rose, 105 USPQ 237 (CCPA 1955). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Hanazaki (US 9,504,142), Kim et al (US 9,198,292), Castillo Garcia et al (US 7,948,762), Kumar et al (US 7,439,449), Klessing et al (US 6,822,168), Akashi et al (US 6,630,625), Wang et al (US 12,381,296), Henle et al (US 11,843,131), Goh et al (US 10,741,817), Yamamoto et al (US 5,195,908), Ueno et al (US 6,392,148) and Sato et al (US 10,347,895) disclose a flexible printed circuit board. Any inquiry concerning this communication should be directed to Angel R. Estrada at telephone number (571) 272-1973. The Examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday (8:30am -5:00pm). If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Imani N. Hayman can be reached on (571) 270-5528. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) OR 571-272-1000. September 22, 2026 /ANGEL R ESTRADA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2841
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 02, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12771105
POWER POST ASSEMBLY WITH REMOVABLE RECEPTACLE HOUSING
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12763561
POWER POST
3y 6m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12763562
Electrical Raceway Installation
3y 2m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12757326
PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD
2y 4m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12750957
CIRCUIT BOARD AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
43%
With Interview (-42.9%)
2y 1m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1377 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month