Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 19/009,184

LOAD SWITCH CIRCUIT AND CONTROLLING CIRCUIT OF THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 03, 2025
Priority
Jan 05, 2024 — CN 202410019047.6
Examiner
RETEBO, METASEBIA T
Art Unit
2842
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Chengdu Monolithic Power Systems Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
603 granted / 673 resolved
+21.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
715
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§103
47.8%
+7.8% vs TC avg
§102
31.2%
-8.8% vs TC avg
§112
13.6%
-26.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 673 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species III, figure 4, reads on claims 1 -5, 7-12, 16-18, 20-23 and 26 in the reply filed on 08/04/2026 is acknowledged. Upon further review, the examiner withdraw claim 26 because it depends from withdrawn claim 25. Drawings Figure 1 should be designated by a legend such as --Prior Art-- because only that which is old is illustrated. See MPEP § 608.02(g). Corrected drawings in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. The replacement sheet(s) should be labeled “Replacement Sheet” in the page header (as per 37 CFR 1.84(c)) so as not to obstruct any portion of the drawing figures. If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-5, 9-12, 16-18 and 22-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a) (1) as being anticipated by Shreepathi Bhat et al. (US 2021/0080986 and Shreepathi hereinafter). Regarding claim 1, Shreepathi discloses a load [104, fig. 1] switch circuit [100, fig. 1a], comprising: a switching element [116], coupled between an input terminal [Vin/114] and an output terminal [Vout terminal/112] of the load switch circuit; and a controlling circuit [118/106], coupled to the switching element, and configured to regulate a current flowing [117] through the switching element to a set current limit [using current limit amplifier circuit 108], wherein the controlling circuit is further configured to control a loop formed [loop from 148/106/118] by the controlling circuit and the switching element based on a sensed signal [Vsense_CL] indicative of the current flowing through the switching element, so that the loop remains stable when a set current limit [par. 0021-0032] of the current flowing through the switching element is changed from a first set current limit [current limit operation mode] to a second set current limit [regular operation mode]. Regarding claim 2, Shreepathi discloses wherein the controlling circuit [fig. 1a] is configured to control a loop gain [using amplifier 118] of the loop based on the sensed signal so that the loop gain remains stable when the set current limit is changed from the first set current limit to the second set current limit. Regarding claim 3, Shreepathi discloses [fig. 1a] further comprising: a current limit adjusting terminal [terminal at 136], coupled to a current limit adjustment element [137], wherein the set current limit is adjusted from the first set current limit to the second set current limit by adjusting the current limit adjustment element. Regarding claim 4, Shreepathi discloses [fig. 1a, par. 0021-0032] wherein the controlling circuit is further configured to regulate the current flowing through the switching element to increase when it is less than the set current limit and decrease when it is greater than the set current limit based on the sensed signal. Regarding claim 5, Shreepathi discloses [fig. 1a] wherein the controlling circuit comprises: an operational amplification circuit [108], configured to receive the sensed signal [Vsense_CL] and a reference signal [Vref_load] and is further configured to provide a controlling signal [CNRL] for regulating the current flowing through the switching element. Regarding claim 9, Shreepathi discloses [fig. 1a] wherein the controlling circuit further comprises: a second transistor [138], coupled to the switching element and the operational amplification circuit, and configured to control the switching element based on the controlling signal, so as to adjust the current flowing through the switching element. Regarding claim 10, Shreepathi discloses [fig. 1a] wherein the controlling circuit further comprises: a current feedback circuit [122], configured to sense the current flowing through the switching element and obtain a sensed current [117] indicative of the current flowing through the switching element, wherein the sensed signal is generated based on the sensed current. Regarding claim 11, Shreepathi discloses a load [104, fig. 1a] switch circuit [100, fig. 1a], comprising: a switching element [116], coupled between an input terminal [114] and an output terminal [112] of the load switch circuit; and a controlling circuit [118/106], coupled to the switching element and forming a loop [loop from 148/106/118] with the switching element, and configured to regulate a current flowing [117] through the switching element to a set current limit [using 106, par. 0021-0032], wherein the controlling circuit is configured to control a gain [using amplifier 118] of the controlling circuit to be linearly proportional to the current flowing through the switching element, so that the loop remains stable when the set current limit is changed from a first set current limit [current limit operation mode] to a second set current limit [regular operation mode]. Regarding claim 12, Shreepathi discloses [fig. 1] wherein the controlling circuit is configured to control a loop gain [using amplifier 118] of the loop to remain stable when the set current limit is changed from the first set current limit to the second set current limit. Regarding claim 16, Shreepathi discloses a controlling circuit [102, fig. 1a, par. 0021-0032] of a load [104] switch circuit [100], wherein the load switch circuit comprises a switching element [116] coupled between an input terminal [114] and an output terminal [112] of the load switch circuit, and wherein, the controlling circuit is coupled to the switching element, and is configured to regulate a set current limit [using 106] of a current flowing [117] through the switching element, wherein the controlling circuit is configured to control a loop formed [loop from 148/106/118] by the controlling circuit and the switching element based on a sensed signal [Vsense_CL] indicative of the current flowing through the switching element, so that the loop remains stable when the set current limit is changed from a first set current limit [current limit operation mode] to a second set current limit [regular operation mode]. Regarding claim 17, Shreepathi discloses [fig. 1a] configured to control a loop gain [using amplifier 118] of the loop based on the sensed signal so that the loop gain remains stable when the set current limit is changed from the first set current limit to the second set current limit. Regarding claim 18, Shreepathi discloses [fig. 1a] comprising: an operational amplification circuit [108], configured to receive the sensed signal [Vsense_CL] and a reference signal [Vref_load] and further configured to provide a controlling signal [148] for regulating the current flowing through the switching element. Regarding claim 22, Shreepathi discloses a controlling circuit [102, fig. 1a, par. 0021-0032] of a load switch circuit [100], wherein the load switch circuit comprises a switching element [116] which is coupled between an input terminal [114] and an output terminal [112] of the load switch circuit, and wherein, the controlling circuit is coupled to the switching element and forms a loop [loop from 148/106/118] with the switching element, and is configured to regulate the current flowing through the switching element to a set current limit [using 106], and wherein the controlling circuit is configured to control a gain [using 118] of the controlling circuit to be linearly proportional to the current flowing through the switching element, so that the loop remains stable when the set current limit is changed from a first set current limit [current limit operation mode] to a second set current limit [regular operation mode]. Regarding claim 23, Shreepathi discloses configured to control a loop gain [using 108] of the loop to remain stable when the set current limit is changed from a first set current limit [current limit operation mode] to a second set current limit [regular operation mode]. Claims 1-4, 11-12, 16-17 and 22-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a) (1) as being anticipated by Jordanger et al. (US 2021/0288621 and Jordanger hereinafter). Regarding claim 1, Jordanger discloses a load switch circuit [201, fig. 2, par. 0035-0040], comprising: a switching element [203], coupled between an input terminal [Vin/216] and an output terminal [VOUT terminal] of the load switch circuit; and a controlling circuit [202/204/212/214], coupled to the switching element, and configured to regulate a current flowing [current flow through 203] through the switching element to a set current limit [using current limit IL], wherein the controlling circuit is further configured to control a loop formed [loop 202/204/203] by the controlling circuit and the switching element based on a sensed signal [sense signal at 207] indicative of the current flowing through the switching element, so that the loop remains stable when a set current limit of the current flowing through the switching element is changed from a first set current limit [current limit value CS2A] to a second set current limit [current limit value CS2B]. Regarding claim 2, Jordanger discloses [fig. 2] wherein the controlling circuit is configured to control a loop gain [using control amplifier 206] of the loop based on the sensed signal so that the loop gain remains stable when the set current limit is changed from the first set current limit to the second set current limit [par. 0035-0040]. Regarding claim 3, Jordanger discloses [fig. 2] further comprising: a current limit adjusting terminal [gate terminal], coupled to a current limit adjustment element [MP1/MP2], wherein the set current limit is adjusted from the first set current limit to the second set current limit by adjusting the current limit adjustment element [par. 0035-0040]. Regarding claim 4, Jordanger discloses [fig. 2] wherein the controlling circuit is further configured to regulate the current flowing through the switching element to increase when it is less than the set current limit and decrease when it is greater than the set current limit based on the sensed signal [par. 0035-0040]. Regarding claim 11, Jordanger discloses a load switch circuit [201, fig. 2], comprising: a switching element [203], coupled between an input terminal [VIN] and an output terminal [VOUT] of the load switch circuit; and a controlling circuit [204/206\202], coupled to the switching element and forming a loop [loop 202/204/203] with the switching element, and configured to regulate a current flowing [current flow through 203] through the switching element to a set current limit [using current limit IL], wherein the controlling circuit is configured to control a gain [206] of the controlling circuit to be linearly proportional to the current flowing through the switching element, so that the loop remains stable when the set current limit is changed from a first set current limit [current limit value CS2A] to a second set current limit [current limit value CS2B]. Regarding claim 12, Jordanger discloses [fig. 2] wherein the controlling circuit is configured to control a loop gain [using 206] of the loop to remain stable when the set current limit is changed from the first set current limit to the second set current limit. Regarding claim 16, Jordanger discloses a controlling circuit of a load switch circuit [200, fig. 2], wherein the load switch circuit comprises a switching element [203] coupled between an input terminal [VIN] and an output terminal [VOUT] of the load switch circuit, and wherein, the controlling circuit is coupled to the switching element, and is configured to regulate a set current limit [IL] of a current flowing [current flowing through 203] through the switching element, wherein the controlling circuit is configured to control a loop formed [loop 202/204/203] by the controlling circuit and the switching element based on a sensed signal [sense signal at 207] indicative of the current flowing through the switching element, so that the loop remains stable when the set current limit is changed from a first set current limit [current limit value CS2A] to a second set current limit [current limit value CS2A]. Regarding claim 17, Jordanger discloses [fig. 2] configured to control a loop gain [using 206] of the loop based on the sensed signal so that the loop gain remains stable when the set current limit is changed from the first set current limit to the second set current limit. Regarding claim 22, Jordanger discloses a controlling circuit of a load switch circuit [200, fig. 2], wherein the load switch circuit comprises a switching element [203] which is coupled between an input terminal [VIN] and an output terminal [VOUT] of the load switch circuit, and wherein, the controlling circuit is coupled to the switching element and forms a loop [loop 202/204/203] with the switching element, and is configured to regulate the current flowing through the switching element to a set current limit [IL], and wherein the controlling circuit is configured to control a gain [using 206] of the controlling circuit to be linearly proportional to the current flowing through the switching element, so that the loop remains stable when the set current limit is changed from a first set current limit [current limit value CS2A] to a second set current limit [current limit value CS2B]. Regarding claim 23, Jordanger discloses [fig. 2] configured to control a loop gain [using 206] of the loop to remain stable when the set current limit is changed from a first set current limit to a second set current limit. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 7-8 and 20-21 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claims 7 and 20, Shreepathi discloses [fig. 1a] wherein the operational amplification circuit comprises: a first-stage differential operational amplification circuit [108], configured to receive the sensed signal [Vsense_CL] and the reference signal [Vref_load], but silent with respect to the above structure in combination with a second-stage differential operational amplification circuit, coupled in series to the first-stage differential operational amplification circuit, and configured to provide the controlling signal. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to METASEBIA T RETEBO whose telephone number is (571)272-9299. The examiner can normally be reached M - F 8:30 - 5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Regis Betsch can be reached at 571-270-7101. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /METASEBIA T RETEBO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2836
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 03, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12771341
SWITCHING CONTROL CIRCUIT
2y 3m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12756386
INTEGRATED RESISTOR-TRANSISTOR-CAPACITOR SNUBBER
3y 5m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12756392
TWO-TERMINAL SYNTHESIS RESISTOR
3y 0m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12756388
RF SWITCH WITH BYPASS TOPOLOGY
2y 0m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12750055
DEVICE AND METHODS FOR SWITCH CONTROL
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+5.2%)
1y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 673 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month