Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/009,453

Compact Universal Gas Pool Heater And Associated Methods

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Jan 03, 2025
Priority
Jul 25, 2018 — provisional 62/703,270 +3 more
Examiner
BAKER, LORI LYNN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Hayward Industries Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
1321 granted / 1682 resolved
+18.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1687
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
60.6%
+20.6% vs TC avg
§102
7.8%
-32.2% vs TC avg
§112
8.0%
-32.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1682 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claims 1-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claims 1-15 of prior U.S. Patent No.12,188,255. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Conclusion The prior art made of record (see USPTO Form 892) and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. More specifically, US Patent 12,110,707 B2 to Roy et al is directed to the state of the art as a teaching of inlet mixer system 10 in combination with a combustion blower 12 for a gas heater. PNG media_image1.png 466 482 media_image1.png Greyscale Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LORI BAKER whose telephone number is (571)272-4971. The examiner can normally be reached Monday thru Friday: 9 am - 6 pm CST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Angwin can be reached 571-270-3735. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LORI L BAKER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3754
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 03, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678370
INFUSION BOWL FOR A SAUNA HEATER
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674336
SYSTEM AND METHOD OF SOLAR HARVESTING FOR AQUATIC DEVICES
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12674309
MODULAR BIDET ATTACHMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12674308
CISTERN SYSTEM, APPARATUS AND METHOD
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12674310
ROTATIONALLY MOLDED LIGATURE RESISTANT TOILET
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+6.6%)
2y 3m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1682 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month