Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/009,627

FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 03, 2025
Priority
Jan 09, 2024 — JP 2024-001455 +1 more
Examiner
GANEY, STEVEN J
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Aisan Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
1145 granted / 1392 resolved
+22.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1409
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
50.8%
+10.8% vs TC avg
§102
20.5%
-19.5% vs TC avg
§112
17.4%
-22.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1392 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claim 1, line 7, the phrase “the outlet” lacks antecedent basis and also raises double inclusion issues with the positive recitation of “a discharge port” in claim 1, lines 4 and 5. The claim recites “sealing which seals the outlet”, however, the claim further recites the “sealing melts” “to open the discharge port”. It is recommended that the phrase “the outlet” is changed to --the discharge port--. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-8 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter of claims 1-8: The closest prior art being Baeder et al ‘823 and Guo ‘286 did not teach or suggest separately or in combination a fire extinguishing system configured to extinguish fire of a battery as claimed by the applicant, specifically a system comprising a case accommodating the battery and including a liquid passage arranged around the battery and a discharge port configured to discharge the extinguishing liquid within the liquid passage toward the battery; and sealing which seals the discharge port, wherein the sealing melts at a temperature equal to or higher than a predetermined melting temperature to open the discharge port, together in combination with the other claimed features of applicant’s invention and if the 35 U.S.C. 112(b) rejection is corrected. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Baeder et al ‘823 and Guo ‘286 disclose fire extinguishing systems for batteries. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEVEN J GANEY whose telephone number is (571)272-4899. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Arthur Hall can be reached at (571)270-1814. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. STEVEN J. GANEY Primary Examiner Art Unit 3752 /STEVEN J GANEY/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3752
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 03, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12667211
MULTIPLE-USE DRINKING STRAWS AND THEIR PRODUCTION
4y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12643658
MODULAR SYSTEM FOR STORING AND JETTISONING FLUID AND AIRCRAFT PROVIDED WITH SUCH A SYSTEM
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12629703
SPRAY NOZZLE DEVICE
3y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12629712
ACCESSORY FOR SIDEWALL SPRINKLER HEAD
2y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12616859
METHOD OF AND SYSTEM FOR DEFENDING HOME BUILDING PROJECTS FROM WILDFIRE DURING AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION ON PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN A WILDFIRE URBAN INTERFACE (WUI) REGION
2y 3m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+10.3%)
2y 6m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1392 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month