Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/010,144

LOCK, METHODS OF USING AND MAKING, PRODUCTS, AND NECESSARY INTERMEDIATES

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 05, 2025
Examiner
BOSWELL, CHRISTOPHER J
Art Unit
3675
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Adam Pierce
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allow Rate
755 granted / 1129 resolved
+14.9% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+26.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
1166
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
29.2%
-10.8% vs TC avg
§102
48.9%
+8.9% vs TC avg
§112
13.4%
-26.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1129 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 108-111 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent Number 10,415,269 to Holmes et al. Holmes et al. disclose a method comprising: disposing locking elements (160) by applying an intended key element (90) to a lock (100), and then moving said locking elements away from exterior surfaces of a locking mechanism such that no mechanical tension remains between the locking elements and the intended key or between the locking elements and the exterior surfaces of the locking mechanism which served to dispose the locking elements when acted upon by the intended key (intended key places the locking elements in a position that allows the locking elements to split the shear line and allow for proper effectuation; figure 4); and comparing disposition of the locking elements against reference components (133, 173) to determine if the locking elements disposed as by the intended key element, wherein the locking mechanism opens if the locking elements disposed as by the intended key, and wherein the locking mechanism remains closed and ready to accept the intended key if the locking elements are otherwise disposed than as by the intended key, and wherein the reference components or the locking elements or both correspond in configuration to the intended key element (column 2, line 60-column 3, line 5), as in claim 108. Holmes et al. also disclose an affordance of the reference components to signal that an attempt was made to open the lock while the locking elements were otherwise disposed than as by the intended key (column 9, lines 47-63), as in claim 109. Holmes et al. further disclose an apparatus comprising: an intended key element (90); and a lock (100) including: locking elements (160) configured to be disposed by the intended key element and then moved away from exterior surfaces of a locking mechanism to block access to the locking elements from an exterior of the locking mechanism or from the intended key element (intended key places the locking elements in a position that allows the locking elements to split the shear line and allow for proper effectuation; figure 4); and reference components (133, 173) configured to be compared against the locking elements to determine if the locking elements are disposed as by the intended key element, wherein the locking mechanism opens if the locking elements are so disposed, else the locking mechanism remains locked and ready to accept the intended key, and wherein the reference components or the locking elements or both correspond in configuration to the intended key element (column 2, line 60-column 3, line 5), as in claim 110. Holmes et al. additionally disclose an affordance of the reference components to signal that an attempt was made to open the lock while the locking elements were otherwise disposed than as by the intended key (column 9, lines 47-63), as in claim 111. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The following patents are cited to further show the state of the art with respect to lock cylinders with auxiliary detection means: U.S. Patent Number 12,037,811 to Magill; U.S. Patent Number 10,988,958 to Newman; U.S. Patent Number 9,416,561 to Field et al.; U.S. Patent Number 9,394,723 to Roth et al.; U.S. Patent Number 8,720,241 to Widen; U.S. Patent Number 7,797,973 to Field et al.; U.S. Patent Number 7,775,074 to Tobias et al.; U.S. Patent Number 6,477,875 to Field et al.; U.S. Patent Number 4,732,022 to Oliver; U.S. Patent Number 4,723,427 to Oliver; U.S. Patent Number 3,987,654 to Iaccino et al. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER J BOSWELL whose telephone number is (571)272-7054. The examiner can normally be reached M-R: 9-4; F 9-12. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kristina Fulton can be reached at 571-272-7376. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER J BOSWELL/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3675 CJB /cb/ February 4, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 05, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12577827
SAFE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12577809
LOCK APPARATUSES WITH SECONDARY LOCKING MECHANISMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12577810
DISPENSER LOCKING ASSEMBLIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12577805
LOCK ASSEMBLY AND METHOD OF INSTALLING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12577812
SECURITY TAG HOLDER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+26.7%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1129 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month