Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/010,292

MOTOR

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 06, 2025
Priority
Jan 16, 2024 — JP 2024-004476
Examiner
CHANG, MINKI
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Toyota Motor Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
287 granted / 399 resolved
+11.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
438
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
80.1%
+40.1% vs TC avg
§102
8.6%
-31.4% vs TC avg
§112
9.3%
-30.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 399 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-6 and 9-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Miyaki et al. (WO 2013/154054 A1). Regarding claim 1, Miyaki discloses a motor (1) comprising: a cylindrical stator core (10); a coil (12) disposed in the stator core (10); a busbar (30U, V, W, J, N) configured to be connected to one end of the coil (12) that protrudes beyond an end face of the stator core (10), the busbar (30U, V, W, J, N) including a connecting portion (35 U,V, W) connected to the one end of the coil (12) from outside in a radial direction (FIG. 2); at least one busbar holder (51) configured to hold the busbar (30U, V, W, J, N) and located radially outward of the one end of the coil (12; FIG. 2); and a housing (2) configured to hold the stator core (10) and the at least one busbar holder (51) from outside in the radial direction (FIG. 1), wherein the connecting portion (35 U,V, W) extends from the busbar holder (51). Regarding claim 2/1, Miyaki was discussed above in claim 1. Miyaki further discloses the housing (2) has a recess (enlarged portion 92) that accommodates at least part of the busbar holder (51), and the busbar holder (51) is in contact with the housing (2) from inside in the radial direction in the recess (92; FIG. 1). Regarding claim 3/2, Miyaki was discussed above in claim 2. Miyaki further discloses the busbar holder (51) is in contact with the housing (2) on at least one side in an axial direction (contact with portion 92a) in the recess (92; FIG. 1). Regarding claim 4/2, Miyaki was discussed above in claim 2. Miyaki further discloses the busbar holder (51) is in contact with the housing (2) on at least one side in a circumferential direction in the recess (92; FIG. 2 the holder has recess 56 which contacts the housing in a circumferential direction). Regarding claim 5/4, Miyaki was discussed above in claim 4. Miyaki further discloses the housing (2) holds the stator core (10) and the busbar holder (51) by an interference fit (stator core and holder are fitted to the housing). PNG media_image1.png 488 1100 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 8/1, Miyaki was discussed above in claim 1. Miyaki further discloses the busbar (30U, V, W, J, N) is a busbar configured to electrically connect an external connection terminal (39U, V, W, 35N) of the motor (1) and the one end of the coil (12). Regarding claim 9/8, Miyaki was discussed above in claim 8. Miyaki further discloses the motor (1) is a three-phase motor (U, V, W phase), the external connection terminal is a U-phase external connection terminal (39U), a V-phase external connection terminal (39V), or a W-phase external connection terminal (39W), and the one end of the coil (12) is one end on an input and output side of a U-phase coil, a V-phase coil, or a W-phase coil (power feeding portion 39U, V, W; FIG. 14). Regarding claim 10/8, Miyaki was discussed above in claim 8. Miyaki further discloses the motor (1) is a three-phase motor (U, V, W phase), the external connection terminal (39U, V, W, 35N) is a neutral point external connection terminal (35N), and the one end of the coil (12) is an end on a neutral point side of a U-phase coil, a V-phase coil, or a W-phase coil (FIG. 14). Regarding claim 11/1, Miyaki was discussed above in claim 1. Miyaki further discloses the motor (1) is a three-phase motor (U, V, W phase), and the busbar (30U, V, W, J, N) is a neutral point busbar that is configured to electrically connect the one end of the coil and one end of another coil and that constitutes a neutral point. Regarding claim 12/1, Miyaki was discussed above in claim 1. Miyaki further discloses the busbar holder (51) holds a plurality of busbars including the busbar (30U, V, W, J, N). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 6-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Miyaki et al. (WO 2013/154054 A1) in view of Inoo et al. (JP 2014-064361 A). Regarding claim 6/1, Miyaki was discussed above in claim 1. Miyaki further discloses the busbar (30U, V, W, J, N) includes an extending portion (31U, V, W, J, N) extending in a circumferential direction (FIG. 6). Miyaki does not disclose the at least one busbar holder includes a plurality of busbar holders that holds the extending portion of the busbar and that is held by the housing from outside in the radial direction. Inoo discloses the at least one busbar holder (25, 40) includes a plurality of busbar holders (25, 40) that holds the extending portion (FIG. 4) of the busbar (21-23) and that is held by the housing (4) from outside in the radial direction (FIG. 1). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing of the claimed invention to have modified Miyaki in view of Inoo to disclose the at least one busbar holder includes a plurality of busbar holders that holds the extending portion of the busbar and that is held by the housing from outside in the radial direction, allowing the bus bars to be secured within the space radially outside the stator coils. Regarding claim 7/6, Miyaki in view of Inoo was discussed above in claim 6. Inoo further discloses the busbar holders (25, 40) are arranged at equal intervals in the circumferential direction (FIG. 4). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MINKI CHANG whose telephone number is (571)270-0521. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Seye Iwarere can be reached at (571) 270-5112. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MINKI CHANG/Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 06, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683449
MOTOR APPARATUS
4y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683450
BUS ASSEMBLY, ELECTRICAL MOTOR, ELECTRIC POWER STEERING SYSTEM, AND VEHICLE
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683473
Method for Producing a Single- Or Multi-Layer Coil, Layer Coil, Electric Machine, and Device
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676515
ROTARY ELECTRIC MACHINE
1y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671291
BUS BAR ASSEMBLY
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+10.2%)
2y 9m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 399 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month