Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/010,559

SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS AND METHOD

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 06, 2025
Priority
Sep 20, 2024 — TW 113135785 +1 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, BAO LONG T
Art Unit
2117
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Manz Taiwan Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
471 granted / 567 resolved
+28.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
589
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.5%
-35.5% vs TC avg
§103
40.1%
+0.1% vs TC avg
§102
18.6%
-21.4% vs TC avg
§112
30.5%
-9.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 567 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION This is a non-final office action on the merits. Claims 1-20 are pending and addressed below. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 1/6/2025 is being considered by the examiner. The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 6/4/2026 is being considered by the examiner. Non-English documents have been considered in as much as the drawings and translated portions provided therein (See MPEP 609). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 10-20 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 10-13 recites the limitation "etching solution". It is not certain if this is referring to the “etching solution information” introduced in claim 9. In addition, there is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 14 recites the limitation "the computing unit" in line 8. It is not clear what computing unit this is referring to. In addition, there is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claims 15-20 depend on this claim and suffer from the same issues. All dependent claims of these claims are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, by virtue of their dependency. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-9 allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Closest prior art is Yamazaki et al. (US 20050233477) discussed substrate processing, processing time, determine reliably. Wang et al. (US 12276972) discussed wafer processing and scheduling. No prior arts teach all claim limitations of the claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BAO LONG T NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)270-7768. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30-4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Khoi Tran can be reached at (571) 272-6919. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. BAO LONG T. NGUYEN Examiner Art Unit 3656 /BAO LONG T NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3656
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 06, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12761632
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING A KNOWLEDGE GRAPH BASED ON INDUSTRIAL DATA
2y 9m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12758322
CONTROL OF A ENDOVASCULAR ROBOTIC INSTRUMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12746689
TENSION-TRACKING FOR SINGLE ROBOT WIRE HARNESSING
1y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12741631
VEHICLE CONTROL APPARATUS AND METHOD THEREOF
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12736980
Path Finding Method and Apparatus for Robot, and Device, and Computer-Readable Storage Medium
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+7.2%)
2y 10m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 567 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month