Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/011,359

PRESENTING SUMMARY OF COMMUNICATION

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 06, 2025
Priority
Jan 05, 2024 — provisional 63/618,141 +1 more
Examiner
TRAN, CONGVAN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Google LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
1058 granted / 1185 resolved
+29.3% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1201
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.2%
-35.8% vs TC avg
§103
25.4%
-14.6% vs TC avg
§102
59.3%
+19.3% vs TC avg
§112
5.8%
-34.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1185 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This office action is in response to claims 1-20 filed on Jan. 06, 2025. Drawings The drawings filed on Jan. 06, 2025, have been approved by Examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Higgins et al, (2016/0037482). Regarding claim 14, Higgins discloses a computing system (see abstract, fig.8, element 800, paragraphs [0011], [0052-0053] and its description) comprising: at least one processor (see abstract, fig.8, element 802, paragraphs [0011], [0052-0054] and its description); and a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium comprising instructions stored thereon that, when executed by the at least one processor, are configured to cause the computing system to (see abstract, fig.8, elements 804, 802, paragraphs [0011], [0052-0054] and its description): receive a message associated with a user account (see abstract, fig.7, step 710, paragraphs [0010], [0044-0045] and its description); determine a priority based on content of the message (see abstract, fig.7, step 720, paragraphs [0010], [0044-0046] and its description); determine a first status associated with the user account (see abstract, fig.7, step 730, paragraphs [0010], [0044-0047] and its description); based on the priority and the first status, withhold notification of the message (see abstract, fig.7, step 740, paragraphs [0010], [0044-0048] and its description); determine a second status associated with the user account (see abstract, fig.7, steps 750-760, paragraphs [0010], [0044-0050] and its description); and based on the priority and the second status, present a summary of the message (see abstract, fig.7, step 770, paragraphs [0010], [0044-0050] and its description). Regarding claim 15, Higgins further discloses wherein the instructions are further configured to cause the computing system to: generate a response based on: content of the message (see abstract, fig.6, element 610, paragraphs [0009], [0040-0041] and its description); and content stored in association with a first application separate from a second application via which the message was received, wherein the summary includes the response (see abstract, fig.6, elements 610, 620, paragraphs [0009], [0040-0043] and its description). Regarding claim 16, Higgins further discloses wherein the first status is determined based on at least one image (see abstract, fig.6, element 610, paragraphs [0009], [0040-0041] and its description). Regarding claim 17, Higgins further discloses wherein the first status is determined based on audio signals (see paragraph [0014], [0049]). Regarding claim 18, Higgins further discloses wherein: the message is a first message, the instructions are further configured to cause the computing system to receive a second message associated with the user account, determining the priority includes determining the priority based on content of the first message and the second message, and the summary is based on the first message and the second message (see abstract, fig.8, element 828, paragraphs [0055], [0049-0050], [0055] and its description). Regarding claim 19, Higgins further discloses wherein: the first message is received via a first application, and the second message is received via a second application that is different from the first application (see abstract, fig.8, element 828, paragraphs [0055], [0049-0050], [0055] and its description). Regarding claim 20, Higgins further discloses wherein the summary includes a prompt to open an application (see fig.5, element 510, paragraphs [0008], [0037-0039] and its description). Regarding claim 8, this feature is not an invention. It’s well-known in mobile telecommunication devices. Regarding claims 1-7 and 9-13 recite limitations substantially similar to claims 14-20. Therefore, these claims were rejected for similar reasons as stated above. Examiner's Note: Examiner has cited particular columns and line numbers in the references applied to the claims above for the convenience of the applicant. Although the specified citations are representative of the teachings of the art and are applied to specific limitations within the individual claim, other passages and figures may apply as well. It is respectfully requested from the applicant in preparing responses, to fully consider the references in entirety as potentially teaching all or part of the claimed invention, as well as the context of the passage as taught by the prior art or disclosed by the Examiner. When responding to this Office Action, Applicant is advised to clearly point out the patentable novelty which he or she thinks the claims present, in view of the state of the art disclosed by the references cited or the objections made. He or she must also show how the amendments avoid such references or objections See 37 CFR 1.111(c). Conclusion Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CongVan Tran whose telephone number is (571) 272-7871. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Th. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Alison Slater can be reached on (571) 270-0375. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197(toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. PNG media_image1.png 100 100 media_image1.png Greyscale UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE /CONGVAN TRAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2647
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 06, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750639
Text Alternative To Established Voice Call Session
5y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744648
METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR REPORTING CONFIGURED GRANT RESOURCE USAGE STATUS
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12738999
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12739655
Handoff Matching in a Network Mesh
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12732797
IDENTIFICATION OF REDUCED CAPABILITY USER EQUIPMENT
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+4.9%)
2y 5m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1185 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month