Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 19/011,579

METHOD AND APPARATUS TO OBTAIN AN EXTRA BIT OF RESOLUTION IN A SINGLE-ENDED SAR ADC

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 06, 2025
Priority
Jan 05, 2024 — provisional 63/618,231
Examiner
JEAN PIERRE, PEGUY
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Reconceive AI Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
94%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 94% — above average
94%
Career Allowance Rate
985 granted / 1045 resolved
+34.3% vs TC avg
Minimal -1% lift
Without
With
+-0.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 8m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
1051
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
40.7%
+0.7% vs TC avg
§102
37.7%
-2.3% vs TC avg
§112
10.4%
-29.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1045 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhang (US 20110090998). With regard to claim 1, Zhang discloses: A single-ended successive approximation register (SAR) digital-to-analog converter (ADC)( ….a Successive Approximation ADC// abstract//Fig. 15) an array of N capacitors (301-303 Fig. 15) each having a first plate coupled to a first node, wherein a second plate of each of the N capacitors is coupled to an associated one of N different switches (306-308 Fig. 15) configured to connect the second plate of the capacitor to a ground voltage or a reference voltage (GND Fig. 15); a comparator (304 Fig. 15) having a first input receiving the voltage of the first node, and a second input that receives the reference voltage if the voltage at the first node during a first phase is smaller than the reference voltage, wherein the second input to the comparator receives twice the reference voltage if the voltage at the first node during the first phase is greater than the reference voltage. (para 41// Figs, 8-9//The ADC 158 compares the voltage on input 167 to a voltage reference VREF. A voltage reference 2VREF that has twice the magnitude of comparison voltage VREF is received onto input 168 of ADC 158 for this purpose). Zhang fails to teach; a second input that receives the reference voltage if the voltage at the first node during a first phase is smaller than the reference voltage, wherein the second input to the comparator receives twice the reference voltage if the voltage at the first node during the first phase is greater than the reference voltage. It is to be noted that the switches of Zhang are activated at different times, hence, they could be activated at different phases of the clock cycle. In addition, it is a to set criteria to apply signals and/or reference voltages based on predetermined function, operation, and characteristic of the converter device. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Cullinane et al (US 2014/0266839) and Ishii (US 2006/0290544) disclose SAR converter with dual reference voltage. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PEGUY JEAN PIERRE whose telephone number is (571) 272-1803. The examiner can normally be reached from 8:00-6:30 PM Monday-Thursday. The examiner’s fax phone number is (571) 273-1803. The Examiner email address is peguy.jeanpierre@uspto.gov. If attempts to reach the Examiner are unsuccessful, the Examiner’s supervisor Dameon E. Levi can be reached at (571) 272-2105. /PEGUY JEAN PIERRE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2845
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 06, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12700876
DATA ENCODING AND DECODING SCHEMES
1y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12683624
DUAL ARBITRATION AND INTERLEAVED SAMPLING ANALOG-TO-DIGITAL CONVERTER (ADC)
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683618
CURRENT-OUTPUT DIGITAL-TO-ANALOG CONVERTER
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676627
ANALOG-TO-DIGITAL CONVERTER AND SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE HAVING THE SAME
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12676626
ANALOG-TO-DIGITAL CONVERTER
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
94%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (-0.7%)
1y 8m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1045 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month