Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/011,732

IMAGING LENS SYSTEM AND CAMERA MODULE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 07, 2025
Priority
Oct 14, 2019 — RE 10-2019-0127269 +2 more
Examiner
COLLINS, DARRYL J
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
1264 granted / 1419 resolved
+29.1% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
1432
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
34.2%
-5.8% vs TC avg
§102
41.7%
+1.7% vs TC avg
§112
11.1%
-28.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1419 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on January 7, 2025; May 1, 2025; and July 22, 2026 have been considered by the examiner. Specification The abstract of the disclosure is objected to because it fails to accurately describe the claimed invention. The abstract includes conditional expressions and details for the first lens, third lens and fourth lens which are not claimed features of the instant invention. A corrected abstract of the disclosure is required and must be presented on a separate sheet, apart from any other text. See MPEP § 608.01(b). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 6-9 and 12-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1 as being anticipated by Tsai et al (U.S. Patent Publication 2012/0300316). With regard to independent claim 1, Tsai et al teaches a lens imaging system (page 1, paragraph [0002] and Figure 9A) comprising: a first lens (page 17, paragraph [0094], lines 9-10 and Figure 9A, element 910) having a refractive power (page 17, paragraph [0094], line 10); a second lens (page 17, paragraph [0094], line 14 and Figure 9A, element 920) having a convex object-side surface (page 17, paragraph [0094], lines 15-16 and Figure 9A, element 921); a third lens (page 17, paragraph [0094], line 18 and Figure 9A, element 930) having a refractive power (page 17, paragraph [0094], lines 18-19); a fourth lens (page 17, paragraph [0094], line 22 and Figure 9A, element 940) having a refractive power (page 17, paragraph [0094], line 22); and a fifth lens (page 17, paragraph [0094], lines 25-26 and Figure 9A, element 950) having a refractive power (page 17, paragraph [0094], line 26), wherein the first to fifth lens are sequentially disposed from an object side toward an imaging plane (Figure 9A), wherein a thickness of the fourth lens along an optical axis (page 17, Table 27, Thickness data for Surface 8 = 0.788) is greater than a thickness of the second lens along the optical axis (page 17, Table 27, Thickness data for Surface 4 = 0.258, wherein 0.788 > 0.258), wherein a radius of curvature of an image-side surface of the fifth lens (page 17, Table 27, Curvature Radius data for Surface 11 = 9.345800) is greater than a radius of curvature of an object-side surface of the first lens (page 17, Table 27, Curvature Radius data for Surface 2 = 1.537140, wherein 9.345800 > 1.537140), wherein a radius of curvature of an image-side surface of the third lens (page 17, Table 27, Curvature Radius data for Surface 7 = -3.206100) is greater than a radius of curvature of an object-side surface of the fourth lens (page 17, Table 27, Curvature Radius data for Surface 8 = -16.603400, wherein -3.206100 > -16.603400), and wherein a radius of curvature of an image-side surface of the fifth lens (page 17, Table 27, Curvature Radius data for Surface 11 = 9.345800) is greater than a radius of curvature of an object-side surface of the fifth lens (page 17, Table 27, Curvature Radius data for Surface 10 = -1.008210, wherein 9.345800 > -1.008210). With regard to dependent claim 2, Tsai et al teaches all of the claimed limitations of the instant invention as outlined above with respect to independent claim 1, and further teaches such a lens imaging system wherein the first lens has a convex object-side surface (page 17, paragraph [0094], lines 10-11 and Figure 9A, element 911). With regard to dependent claim 3, Tsai et al teaches all of the claimed limitations of the instant invention as outlined above with respect to independent claim 1, and further teaches such a lens imaging system wherein the first lens has a convex image-side surface (page 17, paragraph [0094], line 11 and Figure 9A, element 921). With regard to dependent claim 6, Tsai et al teaches all of the claimed limitations of the instant invention as outlined above with respect to independent claim 1, and further teaches such a lens imaging system wherein the fourth lens has a concave object-side surface (page 17, paragraph [0094], line 21 and Figure 9A, element 941). With regard to dependent claim 7, Tsai et al teaches all of the claimed limitations of the instant invention as outlined above with respect to independent claim 1, and further teaches such a lens imaging system wherein the fifth lens has a concave image-side surface (page 17, paragraph [0094], line 25 and Figure 9A, element 952). With regard to independent claim 8, Tsai et al teaches a lens imaging system (page 1, paragraph [0002] and Figure 9A) comprising: a first lens (page 17, paragraph [0094], lines 9-10 and Figure 9A, element 910) having a refractive power (page 17, paragraph [0094], line 10); a second lens (page 17, paragraph [0094], line 14 and Figure 9A, element 920) having a convex object-side surface (page 17, paragraph [0094], lines 15-16 and Figure 9A, element 921); a third lens (page 17, paragraph [0094], line 18 and Figure 9A, element 930) having a refractive power (page 17, paragraph [0094], lines 18-19); a fourth lens (page 17, paragraph [0094], line 22 and Figure 9A, element 940) having a refractive power (page 17, paragraph [0094], line 22); and a fifth lens (page 17, paragraph [0094], lines 25-26 and Figure 9A, element 950) having a refractive power (page 17, paragraph [0094], line 26), wherein the first to fifth lens are sequentially disposed from an object side toward an imaging plane (Figure 9A), wherein a thickness of the fourth lens along an optical axis (page 17, Table 27, Thickness data for Surface 8 = 0.788) is greater than a thickness of the third lens along the optical axis (page 17, Table 27, Thickness data for Surface 6 = 0.732, wherein 0.788 > 0.732), wherein a radius of curvature of an image-side surface of the fifth lens (page 17, Table 27, Curvature Radius data for Surface 11 = 9.345800) is greater than a radius of curvature of an object-side surface of the first lens (page 17, Table 27, Curvature Radius data for Surface 2 = 1.537140, wherein 9.345800 > 1.537140), wherein a radius of curvature of an image-side surface of the third lens (page 17, Table 27, Curvature Radius data for Surface 7 = -3.206100) is greater than a radius of curvature of an object-side surface of the fourth lens (page 17, Table 27, Curvature Radius data for Surface 8 = -16.603400, wherein -3.206100 > -16.603400), and wherein a radius of curvature of an image-side surface of the fifth lens (page 17, Table 27, Curvature Radius data for Surface 11 = 9.345800) is greater than a radius of curvature of an object-side surface of the fifth lens (page 17, Table 27, Curvature Radius data for Surface 10 = -1.008210, wherein 9.345800 > -1.008210). With regard to dependent claim 9, Tsai et al teaches all of the claimed limitations of the instant invention as outlined above with respect to independent claim 8, and further teaches such a lens imaging system wherein the first lens has a convex object-side surface (page 17, paragraph [0094], lines 10-11 and Figure 9A, element 911). With regard to dependent claim 12, Tsai et al teaches all of the claimed limitations of the instant invention as outlined above with respect to independent claim 8, and further teaches such a lens imaging system wherein the fourth lens has a concave object-side surface (page 17, paragraph [0094], line 21 and Figure 9A, element 941). With regard to dependent claim 13, Tsai et al teaches all of the claimed limitations of the instant invention as outlined above with respect to independent claim 8, and further teaches such a lens imaging system wherein the fifth lens has a convex object-side surface (page 17, paragraph [0094], lines 24-25 and Figure 9A, element 951). With regard to dependent claim 14, Tsai et al teaches all of the claimed limitations of the instant invention as outlined above with respect to independent claim 8, and further teaches such a lens imaging system wherein the fifth lens has a concave image-side surface (page 17, paragraph [0094], line 25 and Figure 9A, element 952). Claims 1, 2 and 4-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1 as being anticipated by Chang et al (U.S. Patent Publication 2017/0351064). With regard to independent claim 1, Chang et al teaches a lens imaging system (page 1, paragraph [0002] and Figure 26) comprising: a first lens (Figure 26, element 3) having a refractive power (Figure 28, Focal length data for First lens element 3); a second lens (Figure 26, element 4) having a convex object-side surface (Figure 28, Radius of curvature data for Second lens element 4, Object-side surface 41); a third lens (Figure 26, element 5) having a refractive power (Figure 28, Focal length data for Third lens element 5); a fourth lens (Figure 26, element 6) having a refractive power (Figure 28, Focal length data for Fourt lens element 6); and a fifth lens (Figure 26, element 7) having a refractive power (Figure 28, Focal length data for Fifth lens element 7), wherein the first to fifth lens are sequentially disposed from an object side toward an imaging plane (Figure 26), wherein a thickness of the fourth lens along an optical axis (Figure 28, Thickness data for Object-side surface 61 = 0.273) is greater than a thickness of the second lens along the optical axis (Figure 28, Thickness data for Object-side surface 41 = 0.233, wherein 0.273 > 0.233), wherein a radius of curvature of an image-side surface of the fifth lens (Figure 28, Radius of curvature data for Image-side surface 71 = 31.837) is greater than a radius of curvature of an object-side surface of the first lens (Figure 28, Thickness data for Object-side surface 31 = 2.147, wherein 31.837 > 2.147), wherein a radius of curvature of an image-side surface of the third lens (Figure 28, Radius of curvature data for Image-side surface 52 = 6.733) is greater than a radius of curvature of an object-side surface of the fourth lens (Figure 28, Radius of curvature data for Object-side surface 61 = -33.333, wherein 6.733 > -33.333), and wherein a radius of curvature of an image-side surface of the fifth lens (Figure 28, Radius of curvature data for Image-side surface 72 = 31.837) is greater than a radius of curvature of an object-side surface of the fifth lens (Figure 28, Radius of curvature data for Object-side surface 71 = -50.125, wherein 31.837 > -50.125). With regard to dependent claim 2, Chang et al teaches all of the claimed limitations of the instant invention as outlined above with respect to independent claim 1, and further teaches such a lens imaging system wherein the first lens has a convex object-side surface (Figure 28, Radius of curvature data for Object-side surface 31 has a positive value). With regard to dependent claim 4, Chang et al teaches all of the claimed limitations of the instant invention as outlined above with respect to independent claim 1, and further teaches such a lens imaging system wherein the third lens has a convex object-side surface (Figure 28, Radius of curvature data for Object-side surface 51 has a positive value). With regard to dependent claim 5, Chang et al teaches all of the claimed limitations of the instant invention as outlined above with respect to independent claim 1, and further teaches such a lens imaging system wherein the third lens has a concave image-side surface (Figure 28, Radius of curvature data for Image-side surface 52 has a positive value). With regard to dependent claim 6, Chang et al teaches all of the claimed limitations of the instant invention as outlined above with respect to independent claim 1, and further teaches such a lens imaging system wherein the fourth lens has a concave object-side surface (Figure 28, Radius of curvature data for Object-side surface 61 has a negative value). With regard to dependent claim 7, Chang et al teaches all of the claimed limitations of the instant invention as outlined above with respect to independent claim 1, and further teaches such a lens imaging system wherein the fifth lens has a concave image-side surface (Figure 28, Radius of curvature data for Image-side surface 72 has a positive value). Claims 8-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yoo (U.S. Patent Publication 2018/0180847) . With regard to independent claim 8, Yoo teaches a lens imaging system (page 1, paragraph [0002] and Figure 11) comprising: a first lens (Figure 11, element 310) having a refractive power (page 7, paragraph [0142], line 1); a second lens (Figure 11, element 320) having a convex object-side surface (page 7, paragraph [0143], line 2); a third lens (Figure 11, element 330) having a refractive power (page 7, paragraph [0144], line 1); a fourth lens (Figure 11, element 340) having a refractive power (page 7, paragraph [0145], lines 1-2); and a fifth lens (Figure 11, element 350) having a refractive power (page 7, paragraph [0146], line 1), wherein the first to fifth lens are sequentially disposed from an object side toward an imaging plane (Figure 11), wherein a thickness of the fourth lens along an optical axis (Figure 14, Thickness or Distance data for Surface 7 = 0.710) is greater than a thickness of the third lens along the optical axis (Figure 14, Thickness or Distance data for Surface 5 = 0.340, wherein 0.710 > 0.340), wherein a radius of curvature of an image-side surface of the fifth lens (Figure 14, Radius of Curvature data for Surface 10 = 6.5362604) is greater than a radius of curvature of an object-side surface of the first lens (Figure 14, Radius of Curvature data for Surface 1 = 3.4283554, wherein 6.5362604 > 3.4283554), wherein a radius of curvature of an image-side surface of the third lens (Figure 14, Radius of Curvature data for Surface 6 = 4.3003475) is greater than a radius of curvature of an object-side surface of the fourth lens (Figure 14, Radius of Curvature data for Surface 7 = -2.4, wherein 4.3003475 > -2.4), and wherein a radius of curvature of an image-side surface of the fifth lens (Figure 14, Radius of Curvature data for Surface 10 = 6.5362604) is greater than a radius of curvature of an object-side surface of the fifth lens (Figure 14, Radius of Curvature data for Surface 9 = 3.5698787, wherein 6.5362604 > 3.5698787). With regard to dependent claim 9, Yoo teaches all of the claimed limitations of the instant invention as outlined above with respect to independent claim 8, and further teaches such a lens imaging system wherein the first lens has a convex object-side surface (page 7, paragraph [0142], lines 2-3). With regard to dependent claim 10, Yoo teaches all of the claimed limitations of the instant invention as outlined above with respect to independent claim 8, and further teaches such a lens imaging system wherein the third lens has a convex object-side surface (page 7, paragraph [0144], line 2). With regard to dependent claim 11, Yoo teaches all of the claimed limitations of the instant invention as outlined above with respect to independent claim 8, and further teaches such a lens imaging system wherein the third lens has a concave image-side surface (page 7, paragraph [0144], line 3). With regard to dependent claim 12, Yoo teaches all of the claimed limitations of the instant invention as outlined above with respect to independent claim 8, and further teaches such a lens imaging system wherein the fourth lens has a concave object-side surface (page 7, paragraph [0145], line 2). With regard to dependent claim 13, Yoo teaches all of the claimed limitations of the instant invention as outlined above with respect to independent claim 8, and further teaches such a lens imaging system wherein the fifth lens has a convex object-side surface (page 7, paragraph [0146], line 2). With regard to dependent claim 14, Yoo teaches all of the claimed limitations of the instant invention as outlined above with respect to independent claim 8, and further teaches such a lens imaging system wherein the fifth lens has a concave image-side surface (page 7, paragraph [0146], line 3)). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DARRYL J COLLINS whose telephone number is (571) 272-2325. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 5:30 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ricky L Mack can be reached at 571-272-2333. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DARRYL J COLLINS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2872 26 August 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 07, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12742946
OPTICAL IMAGING SYSTEM
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12736837
COLORED BLUE BLOCKERS
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12736787
OPTICAL IMAGE CAPTURING SYSTEM
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12730333
METHOD FOR DETERMINING AN OPHTHALMIC LENS
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12724293
CONDUCTIVE CONNECTION THROUGH EYEWEAR HINGE
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+4.9%)
2y 0m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1419 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month