Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 19/011,736

Indexing Valve For Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer

Non-Final OA §102§Other
Filed
Jan 07, 2025
Priority
Dec 17, 2021 — provisional 63/265,582 +1 more
Examiner
PRICE, CRAIG JAMES
Art Unit
3753
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Process Combustion Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
709 granted / 1032 resolved
-1.3% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
1069
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
37.0%
-3.0% vs TC avg
§102
25.4%
-14.6% vs TC avg
§112
29.8%
-10.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1032 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §Other
DETAILED ACTION Claim 1 is pending, claims 2 and 3 have been cancelled. This is in response to the amendment filed 7/8/2026. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 7/8/2026 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicants’ arguments, see pages filed 7/8/2026, with respect to the prior rejections have been fully considered and are persuasive. The 35 USC 102 rejections to claim 1 of the prior action have been withdrawn. Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1 has/have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Since applicant’s amendments necessitated the new grounds for rejection, this action has been made Non-Final. Drawings The drawings are objected to because, at least the numerals 21 and 27 in the drawings are pointing to different components than described in the specification (e.g. 27 is a “drive shaft” as disclosed in the system, however numeral 27 in several drawings, is pointing to a space between the plates). Since the above objections are found, the previous objections to the drawings are maintained. The drawings are objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(4) because reference character “44” has been used to designate both gear reducer and evacuative blower (a further change to the reference numerals in the specification is needed for the drawing corrections). Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Specification The amendments overcome the prior objections, and the amendments have been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Houston (US 5529758). Regarding claim 1, Houston discloses a regenerative thermal oxidizer, comprising: a combustion chamber (30); first and second heat exchangers (24,28) in flow communication with said combustion chamber; a valve housing (160, see Fig. 3c,4) in flow communication with said first and second heat exchangers, said valve housing further comprising a diverter blade subassembly (188,190,282,280, with rotor 322, see Fig. 10) within said valve housing, said diverter blade subassembly further comprising a pair of opposing diverter plates (188,190 opposing plates), said diverter blade subassembly rotatable (col.6, lns. 34-55) between defined positions to selectively direct process gas between said first and second heat exchangers, wherein an inlet plenum (the inlet of 188/190 nearest 176, see Fig. 3C) is defined between said diverter plates, said inlet plenum comprising a fluid-directing chamber (the space between 188/190) that alternatively communicates with said first and second heat exchangers during said defined positions (see Fig. 3A-3C,col.7, lns. 12-col.9, lns.7); an evacuative assembly (146,152, lines 150,154) in fluid communication directly with said inlet plenum, said evacuative assembly configured to draw fluid from said inlet plenum between said diverter plates, wherein said fluid within said inlet plenum between said diverter plates is maintained at a negative pressure relative to said valve housing (col.10, lns. 10-55), wherein a fluid seal is formed across said diverter plates such that leakage of said process gas between flow paths is minimized (col.10, lns. 38-60). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Craig Price, whose telephone number is (571)272-2712 or via facsimile (571)273-2712. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday (8:00AM-4:30PM EST). If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Craig Schneider, can be reached at telephone number 571-272-3607, Kenneth Rinehart can be reached at 571-272-4881. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center, for more information about Patent Center and, https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx, for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) Form at Form at; https://www.uspto.gov/patents/uspto-automated-interview-request-air-form. /CRAIG J PRICE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3753
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 07, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §Other
Mar 23, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 08, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §Other
Jul 08, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 16, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12692953
Self-Regulating Storm Water Control Valve
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12686261
CONTROL VALVE AND COOLING SYSTEM FOR VEHICLE INCLUDING THE SAME
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12678707
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR A DRY STEAM SPECIAL EFFECT
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674517
VALVE ASSEMBLY
1y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12667870
FULL-FLOW SANITARY VALVE
5y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+22.1%)
2y 11m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1032 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month