Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/012,212

OUT OF ROOM BED STATUS LIGHT MODULE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 07, 2025
Priority
Jan 30, 2024 — provisional 63/626,636
Examiner
GARCIA, CARLOS E
Art Unit
2686
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Hill-Rom Services Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
709 granted / 922 resolved
+14.9% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
944
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
§103
49.6%
+9.6% vs TC avg
§102
34.4%
-5.6% vs TC avg
§112
12.3%
-27.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 922 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
NON-FINAL REJECTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 8/27/2026 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see pages 6-8, filed 8/27/2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) under prior rejections have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of newly found prior art. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-11, 13-15 and 19-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over WILLIAMS et al. (US 20220313515 A1) in view of PESOT et al. (US 8779924 B2) further in view of HART et al. (US 20130069865 A1). Re claim 1. WILLIAMS discloses (abstract) a device status system 20 (FIG.1) comprising: an outlet 32 positioned in a patient room and operating as a hub for a localized wireless network [0280-0281], the outlet configured to receive apparatus data from an apparatus 30 connected to the outlet wherein the apparatus comprises a patient care device (i.e. a patient bed) that is configured to provide visual notifications related to the apparatus data (via various interfaces such as graphical user interface (GUI) 38), and a status module 48 arranged to lie outside the patient room, [0284] wherein the status module receives the apparatus data over the localized wireless network, and [0290] wherein caregivers can view (FIG.2) information related to the apparatus data appearing on the status module without entering the patient room. [0475] WILLIAMS further suggests to one of ordinary skill in the art using wireless communication 54 by way of outlet 32 being connected to wireless access points (WAP's) 52. One of ordinary skill in the art understands that at the time of the invention and prior art of WILLIAMS, wireless communication networks were well known. One of ordinary skill in the art would be encouraged to reroute or restructure certain devices, such as servers or other devices capable of wireless communication, to achieve communication in more remote locations. However, WILLIAMS et al. (US 20220313515 A1) fails to explicitly disclose: wherein the status module is connected to the localized wireless network and communicates with the outlet via a wireless connection. Clearly one of ordinary skill in the art would be encourages wireless communication and connections (FIG.1) given that similar devices, to that of status board 48 such as servers connected wirelessly thru a network 60 [0289-0290] for the purpose of wirelessly connecting servers with status board 48 and servers 62. PESOT (referenced by WILLIAMS as incorporated by reference) teaches (abstract) in a similar field of invention, wherein a status module 12 part of computer 10 is connected wired or wirelessly thru communication link 94 to a wireless network via other devices all well-known in the art. One of ordinary skill in the art is motivated to use either a wired or wireless links and/or combinations thereof. (c.7, l.11-15) It would have been obvious to use a wireless communication rather than wired communication link, because the modification of adapting from a wired to a wireless connection using wireless access points across remote locations, would have constituted the mere arrangement of old elements with each performing the same function it had been known to perform, the combination yielding no more than one would expect from such an arrangement. WILLIAMS further discloses at least one of various apparatuses (FIG.1) such as status board 48 and nurse call master station(s) 50 which may be located remote from patient room and connected using different communication links [0290]. However, WILLIAMS et al. (US 20220313515 A1) and PESOT et al. (US 8779924 B2) fails to explicitly disclose: a display coupled to the localized wireless network to display at least a subset of the apparatus data, wherein the display is mobile, wherein the localized wireless network automatically provisions the display to wirelessly connect the display to the localized wireless network in response to the display moving within a predetermined distance to the patient room, wherein the display is provisioned wirelessly to the localized wireless network without having any wired connection to the outlet, the apparatus, or any other apparatus within the patient room. HART teaches (abstract) in a similar field of invention (FIG.1-4), the concept of using a local wireless connection for a display device when the device is moving within a specific range. [0045] A primary station 412 that automatically connects to any portable display 402 within range may be desirable in many instances, such as when the primary station 412 is located in a vehicle. Thus, when an additional passenger enters the vehicle with their own portable display 402, the portable display 402 begins to receive power via its power receiver, and primary station 412 may detect the portable display 402 upon receipt of a connection request received from the device. If the primary station 412 does not require a password to access, the primary station 412 may begin to transmit data to the newly detected portable display 402. Primary station 412 may transmit the same content to each portable display 402A, 402B, 402C in the vehicle. Primary station 412 may also transmit different content to each portable display 402A, 402B, 402C. One of ordinary skill in the art, would be encouraged to adapt a wireless device such as outlet and other wireless capable devices of WILLIAMS as described, to provide wireless options for removing some wired connections which limit the range and location of remote devices, such as display devices, including nurse mobile phones, status boards, nurse call master stations. This modification would allow for nurses in different locations in a clinic or hospital setting to be located throughout various places, not limited to being inside vicinity of patient room. It would have been obvious to use a wireless connection for a local network rather than a wired connection requiring a specific fixed location close to a wired connector, because the modification of removing wired connections for wireless connection once a device enters a close range to eliminate the need for a limited range for connecting devices, would have constituted the mere arrangement of old elements with each performing the same function it had been known to perform, the combination yielding no more than one would expect from such an arrangement. 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the apparatus is connected to the outlet by inserting a plug of the apparatus into a receptacle of the outlet. [0303] 3. The system of claim 2, wherein the localized wireless network automatically provisions the apparatus to wirelessly connect the apparatus to the localized wireless network in response to the plug of the apparatus being inserted into the receptacle of the outlet. [0303] 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the localized wireless network automatically provisions the apparatus to wirelessly connect the apparatus to the localized wireless network in response to the apparatus being positioned in the patient room. [0303] 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the status module displays apparatus data including at least one of a bed in lo-lo alert, a side rail protocol alert, a bed exit alert, a heart rate alert, and a respiratory rate alert. [0280, 0290, 0464, 0509] 6. The system of claim 1, further comprising a lighting system positioned in the patient room and connected to the localized wireless network. [0288-0289] 7. The system of claim 6, wherein the lighting system is operated in response to apparatus data transmitted over the localized wireless network. [0288-0289] 8. The system of claim 7, wherein the lighting system is operated to convey a status of the apparatus. [0288-0289] 9. The system of claim 1, further comprising at least one indicator light assembly positioned outside the patient room and connected to the localized wireless network. [0475] (48 – status board would implicitly include at least one light indicator on a screen) 10. The system of claim 9, wherein the at least one indicator light assembly is operated in response to apparatus data transmitted over the localized wireless network. [0475] (48 – status board would implicitly include at least one light indicator on a screen) 11. The system of claim 10, wherein the at least one indicator light assembly is operated to convey a status of the apparatus. [0475] (48 – status board would implicitly include at least one light indicator on a screen) 13. The system of claim 1, wherein the apparatus is a patient support apparatus and the subset of the apparatus data includes at least one of information related to a head of bed angle, a side rail position, a patient alert setting, a patient name, a patient heart rate, a patient respiratory rate, a patient weight, and diagnostic trouble codes. [0280, 0290, 0464, 0509] 14. The system of claim 1, wherein the display includes a control system for controlling the apparatus. (FIG.48-52) 15. The system of claim 14, wherein the apparatus is a patient support apparatus and the control system controls at least one of a patient support apparatus lockout, a bed exit alert, a microclimate management system, a heart rate monitor, and a respiratory rate monitor. [0280, 0290, 0464, 0509] Re claim 19. As for claim 1, a device status system comprising: an outlet positioned in a patient room and operating as a hub for a localized wireless network, the outlet the outlet configured to receive apparatus data from each of the apparatuses connected to the outlet, a status module arranged to lie outside the patient room, wherein the status module receives the apparatus data over the localized wireless network, wherein caregivers can view the apparatus data appearing on the status module without entering the patient room, a lighting system 78 positioned in the patient room (FIG.1) and wirelessly connected to the localized wireless network (FIG.1) to convey a status of at least one of the apparatuses [0288-0289], and at least one indicator light (48 – status board would implicitly include at least one light indicator on a screen) assembly positioned outside the patient room and wirelessly connected to the localized wireless network to convey a status of at least one of the apparatuses. [0475] However, WILLIAMS et al. (US 20220313515 A1) fails to explicitly disclose: wherein the status module is wirelessly connected to the localized wireless network and communicates with the outlet via a wireless connection. As explained for claim 1 above. Same reasoning applies. However, WILLIAMS et al. (US 20220313515 A1) and PESOT et al. (US 8779924 B2) fails to explicitly disclose: wherein the outlet enables multiple apparatuses to be wirelessly paired thereto. HART enables wirelessly pairing by devices at a certain range, which is advantageous so as to avoid having only wired connections which limits the location of apparatuses to connect with local network. It would have been obvious to use a wireless connection for a local network rather than a wired connection requiring a specific fixed location close to a wired connector, because the modification of removing wired connections for wireless connection once a device enters a close range to eliminate the need for a limited range for connecting devices, would have constituted the mere arrangement of old elements with each performing the same function it had been known to perform, the combination yielding no more than one would expect from such an arrangement. Re claim 20. (FIG.48-52) the device status system of claim 19, further comprising a display coupled to the status module to display the apparatus data, wherein the display is coupled to a control system for controlling the apparatus. Re claim 21. (FIG.1 [0288]) the device status system of claim 19, wherein the lighting system is included in a first apparatus of the multiple apparatuses. Claim(s) 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over WILLIAMS et al. (US 20220313515 A1) in view of PESOT et al. (US 8779924 B2) further in view of ZERHUSEN (US 10206836 B2) further in view of HART et al. (US 20130069865 A1). Re claim 18. As for claim 1, a patient support apparatus status system comprising: an outlet positioned in a patient room, the outlet configured to receive apparatus data (under broadest reasonable interpretation – apparatus data could range from bed status to patient status, to any alert or control message for bed or from patient) from a patient support apparatus connected to the outlet, a bed status module arranged to lie outside the patient room, wherein the bed status module displays the first subset of apparatus data by illuminating module graphical indicia that matches the patient support apparatus graphical indicia, wherein the module graphical indicia is illuminated in the same color as the support apparatus graphical indicia. (implicitly a display for nurse station or status board must include at least one graphical indicia to illustrate patient or bed status for instance, which is considered one subset of patient data – the color used could vary and be selected based on need or design choice, such as using a color red to indicate a potential patient problem) However, WILLIAMS et al. (US 20220313515 A1) fails to explicitly disclose: connected to the outlet via a wireless connection. As explained for claim 1 above. Same reasoning applies. However, WILLIAMS et al. (US 20220313515 A1) and PESOT et al. (US 8779924 B2) fails to explicitly disclose: wherein the patient support apparatus projects patient support apparatus graphical indicia onto the floor to convey at least a first subset of the apparatus data. ZERHUSEN teaches (abstract) in a similar field of invention, a bed which includes a means of lighting the floor nearest the bed to graphically illustrate a situation (apparatus/bed data) in which a patient should egress from a bed as needed. (35) FIG. 34 is a person support apparatus according to another contemplated embodiment of the current disclosure showing a night-light configured to alert the user to a status of the person support apparatus, such as, when the person support apparatus is in a position where the occupant can egress from the bed. The light illuminating the floor with a red light to indicate that the user of an unsatisfactory condition, such as, that the bed is not in a predetermined egress position; (36) FIG. 35 is the person support apparatus of FIG. 34, wherein the handle of the grip and the floor are illuminated with a green light to indicate that the occupant can egress from the bed; Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to try using an illumination function to illustrate a bed condition to a patient for instance in order to provide safety information to patient (given the broadness of the claim limitation regarding subset of apparatus data). WILLIAMS further discloses at least one of various apparatuses (FIG.1) such as status board 48 and nurse call master station(s) 50 which may be located remote from patient room and connected using different communication links [0290]. However, WILLIAMS et al. (US 20220313515 A1) and PESOT et al. (US 8779924 B2) fails to explicitly disclose: a display coupled to the localized wireless network to display at least a subset of the apparatus data, wherein the display is mobile, wherein the localized wireless network automatically provisions the display to wirelessly connect the display to the localized wireless network in response to the display moving within a predetermined distance to the patient room, wherein the display is provisioned wirelessly to the localized wireless network without having any wired connection to the outlet, the apparatus, or any other apparatus within the patient room. HART teaches (abstract) in a similar field of invention (FIG.1-4), the concept of using a local wireless connection for a display device when the device is moving within a specific range. [0045] A primary station 412 that automatically connects to any portable display 402 within range may be desirable in many instances, such as when the primary station 412 is located in a vehicle. Thus, when an additional passenger enters the vehicle with their own portable display 402, the portable display 402 begins to receive power via its power receiver, and primary station 412 may detect the portable display 402 upon receipt of a connection request received from the device. If the primary station 412 does not require a password to access, the primary station 412 may begin to transmit data to the newly detected portable display 402. Primary station 412 may transmit the same content to each portable display 402A, 402B, 402C in the vehicle. Primary station 412 may also transmit different content to each portable display 402A, 402B, 402C. It would have been obvious to use a wireless connection for a local network rather than a wired connection requiring a specific fixed location close to a wired connector, because the modification of removing wired connections for wireless connection once a device enters a close range to eliminate the need for a limited range for connecting devices, would have constituted the mere arrangement of old elements with each performing the same function it had been known to perform, the combination yielding no more than one would expect from such an arrangement. Conclusion The prior art made of record in PTO-892 Form and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant’s disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CARLOS E GARCIA whose telephone number is (571)270-1354. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 9-6pm F 9-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Zimmerman can be reached at (571) 272-3059. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. CARLOS E. GARCIA Primary Examiner Art Unit 2686 /Carlos Garcia/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2686 8/29/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 07, 2025
Application Filed
Mar 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 20, 2026
Response Filed
May 01, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 18, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 27, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 28, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749359
MOBILITY SERVICE BASE SERVER, MOBILITY SERVICE PROVIDING SYSTEM, VEHICLE ACCESS CONTROL METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12741610
VEHICLE CONTROL DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12743916
LOCK AND METHOD FOR OPERATING SAME
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12734993
CONSTRUCTION MACHINE AND USER LOGIN METHOD USING SAME
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12708689
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING SANITIZATION STATUS
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+16.4%)
2y 4m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 922 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month