Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 21, 2026
Application No. 19/012,435

OPTICAL LAMINATE, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME, SMART WINDOW INCLUDING THE SAME, AND AUTOMOBILE AND WINDOW FOR BUILDING USING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 07, 2025
Priority
Jan 10, 2024 — RE 10-2024-0004013
Examiner
LAVARIAS, ARNEL C
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Dongwoo Fine-chem Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
681 granted / 853 resolved
+19.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
871
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
40.7%
+0.7% vs TC avg
§102
28.9%
-11.1% vs TC avg
§112
18.8%
-21.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 853 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Drawings The originally filed drawings were received on 1/7/2025. These drawings are objected to for the following reason(s) as set forth below. The drawings are objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(5) because they do not include the following reference sign(s) mentioned in the description: Figure 1- Reference numeral 150 Figure 2- Reference numeral 240. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Specification The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the closest peaks" in line 16. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claims 2-14 are dependent on Claim 1, and hence inherit the deficiencies of Claim 1. Claim 2, line 5 recites the limitation ‘a radius of the ball spacer’. However, Claim 1, line 17 also recites the limitation of ‘a radius of the ball spacer’. This appears to be problematic, since it is not clear whether the radius in Claim 2 is to refer to that in Claim 1, or to a separate radius not previously recited. Correction is required. Claim 3, line 5 recites the limitation ‘a radius of the ball spacer’. However, Claim 1, line 17 also recites the limitation of ‘a radius of the ball spacer’. This appears to be problematic, since it is not clear whether the radius in Claim 3 is to refer to that in Claim 1, or to a separate radius not previously recited. Correction is required. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-14 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 1 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Claims 2-3 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Claim 1 is allowable over the cited art of record for at least the reason that the cited art of record fails to teach or reasonably suggest a transmittance variable optical laminate as generally set forth in Claim 1, the laminate including, in combination with the features recited in Claim 1, at least one of the first polarizing plate and the second polarizing plate comprises a functional layer having a plurality of pattern portions satisfying the following Equation 1: 2 µm ≤ a ≤ 2r; wherein a is a distance between the closest peaks in each pattern portion, and r is a radius of the ball spacer. Claims 2-14 are dependent on Claim 1, and hence are allowable for at least the same reasons Claim 1 is allowable. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. CN 101315497 B to Xie et al. U.S. Patent Application Publication US 2008/0061422 A1 to Han et al. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ARNEL C LAVARIAS whose telephone number is (571)272-2315. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10:30 AM-7 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Stephone Allen can be reached at 571-272-2434. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. ARNEL C. LAVARIAS Primary Examiner Group Art Unit 2872 10/2/2026 /ARNEL C LAVARIAS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2872
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 07, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12761492
DIFFRACTIVE DISPLAY SYSTEM WITH ADJUSTABLE IPD
2y 4m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12760994
MULTI-LOCK ADJUSTMENT TURRET FOR AN OPTICAL AIMING DEVICE
2y 4m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12761529
CAMERA LENS HOOD PROVIDING FOR INDEPENDENT YAW, ROLL, AND PITCH ROTATIONS FOR A PLURALITY OF LENS FILTERS
1y 1m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12754712
FLOATING-POINT MULTIPLICATION UNIT AND FLOATING POINT PHOTONIC TENSOR ACCELERATOR
2y 6m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12748338
Non-Gaussian Photonic State Engineering
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+0.2%)
2y 10m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 853 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month