Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 19/013,091

MAGNETIC TOY

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 08, 2025
Priority
Dec 27, 2024 — CN 202411944731.1
Examiner
FERNSTROM, KURT
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Hangzhou Asweets Cultural Creative Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allowance Rate
1062 granted / 1609 resolved
-4.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
1639
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
12.8%
-27.2% vs TC avg
§103
40.4%
+0.4% vs TC avg
§102
15.5%
-24.5% vs TC avg
§112
22.8%
-17.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1609 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 14 is objected to because of the following informalities: In line 3, “the mounting assembly are provided” should be “the mounting assembly is provided”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 12 and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claim 12, the claim language “form of a flattened plate-like” is indefinite, as “plate-like” is an adjective and does not have a form. Also, “the flat side of the toy body is a curved surface is indefinite, as the side cannot be both flat and curved. In claim 13, line 2, it is not clear what is meant by “in a length direction”. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 4, 7-11 and 14 are allowed. Claims 12 and 13 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art fails to disclose or suggest a device having each of the recited limitations. While various magnetic toy devices are known, including devices comprising mechanisms for connecting and retaining a magnet on a toy body for magnetic connection to another toy body, the specific configuration of structural elements as recited in claim 1 is not disclosed in the prior art, nor is there any motivation or suggestion to modify the teachings of the prior art to create the claimed invention without using impermissible hindsight. As a result, claim 1 and its dependent claims 4 and 7-14 contain allowable subject matter. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KURT FERNSTROM whose telephone number is (571)272-4422. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Peter Vasat can be reached at 571-270-7625. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KURT FERNSTROM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715 July 13, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 08, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12699943
DETECTING EVENTS DURING A SURGERY
4y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12700331
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR A NEUROSURGICAL SIMULATION MODEL FOR SURGICAL TRAINING
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12694801
VASCULAR LESION MODEL
2y 12m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12682786
SYSTEM FOR ADVANCED PHYSICIAN TRAINING AND PATIENT SPECIFIC REHEARSALS
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12678701
Omnidirectional Remote Control Toy Car
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+14.6%)
2y 7m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1609 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month