Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 19/013,210

Exclusive Delivery of Content Within Geographic Areas

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 08, 2025
Examiner
AJIBADE AKONAI, OLUMIDE
Art Unit
3648
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Unknown
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
989 granted / 1172 resolved
+32.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1201
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.3%
-33.7% vs TC avg
§103
44.9%
+4.9% vs TC avg
§102
26.0%
-14.0% vs TC avg
§112
14.8%
-25.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1172 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claim 32 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventors, at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claim 32 recites the limitation “identifier.” The applicant’s specification discloses multiple types of identifiers: request identifier (see [0007], [0031], [0061-[0063]), application identifier (see [0033]), alphanumeric identifier (see [0050]), and boundary identifier (see [0046]). The applicant’s claims are directed to all these identifiers since it simply recites “identifiers” without specifying what identifier is been claimed or used. However, in the context of the applicant’s specification, the identifier can only be the alphanumeric identifier. This is the only identifier that is associated with the applicant’s claim limitation. However, since the broadly claim identifier incorporates all possible identifiers, including application identifier, boundary identifier, and request identifier, the currently pending claim is not taught, suggested, or made obvious by the applicant’s specification and thus constitutes new matter. The applicant can amend the claim to specify the exact “identifier” that are being referred to in the claim (claim 33 already reflects the correct identifier). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-14, 16-28, 31, and 33 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Regarding claim 1, the combination of accessing and sending, as recited in the claims, are no taught, suggested, or made obvious by any prior art of record, alone, or in combination. Regarding claim 28, the combination of accessing and sending, as recited in the claims, are no taught, suggested, or made obvious by any prior art of record, alone, or in combination. Prior art references such as Yoon et al 20080270235 discloses storing advertisement registered by an advertiser, and transmitting the stored advertisement to a navigation terminal. Patel et al US 20070214040 discloses storing an advertisement along with coordinate location information and a radius, to be transmitted to a device that is within said radius of the coordinate location. However, Yoon, Patel, and any other prior art of record do not teach or suggest the combination of the limitations of claims 1 and 28 as recited. Claims 2-14 and 16-27 are allowed by virtue of being dependent on claim 1. Claims 31 and 33 are allowed by virtue of being dependent on claim 28. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OLUMIDE T AJIBADE AKONAI whose telephone number is (571)272-6496. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8AM-4PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, CHARLES N APPIAH can be reached at 571-272-7904. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /OLUMIDE AJIBADE AKONAI/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3645
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 08, 2025
Application Filed
Mar 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Jun 25, 2025
Response Filed
Jul 15, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Oct 17, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 17, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 25, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Mar 23, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 04, 2026
Final Rejection — §112
Apr 09, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593304
WIRELESS LAN SIGNAL BASED MOTION DETECTION METHOD AND DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12591911
Exclusive Delivery of Content Within Geographic Areas
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12591912
Exclusive Delivery of Content Within Geographic Areas
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12581565
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR OPERATING DRX TIMER BY USER EQUIPMENT IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12579554
Exclusive Delivery of Content Within Geographic Areas
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+5.2%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1172 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month