Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/013,307

Tissue Inflammation and Electrical Stimulation

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 08, 2025
Priority
Jan 08, 2024 — provisional 63/618,444
Examiner
TURCHEN, ROCHELLE DEANNA
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Neurostim Technologies LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
57%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 57% of resolved cases
57%
Career Allowance Rate
374 granted / 659 resolved
-3.2% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+29.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 1m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
687
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
§103
87.0%
+47.0% vs TC avg
§102
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
§112
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 659 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-20 are is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hamner et al (2021/0252278). Regarding claim 1, Hamner et al disclose a method of treating inflammation of a user, the method comprising: applying a first patch on a dermis of the user adjacent to an afferent nerve, the first patch comprising first electrodes (second afferent peripheral nerve comprises the saphenous nerve – [0010]; stimulation of one, two, or more target nerves of interest, e.g., the saphenous, tibial median and/or vagus nerve – [0065]; a plurality of stimulator housings 6000 that can include…a patch 6002 having electrodes 6004 and a skin contacting surface – [0112]); applying a second patch on the dermis of the user adjacent to a vagus nerve or a vagus nerve connecting branch, the second patch comprising second electrodes (stimulation of one, two, or more target nerves of interest, e.g., the saphenous, tibial median and/or vagus nerve – [0065]; a plurality of stimulator housings 6000 that can include…a patch 6002 having electrodes 6004 and a skin contacting surface – [0112]); and generating a treatment protocol during a time period comprising simultaneously apply a first electrical stimuli to the afferent nerve via the first electrodes of the first patch and applying a second electrical stimuli to the vagus nerve or the vagus nerve connecting branch via the second electrodes of the second patch (multiple stimulators may be in electrical connection with multiple electrode pairs to stimulate multiple nerves simultaneously – [0112]). Regarding claim 2, Hamner et al disclose wherein the first patch is applied on or near an occurrence of the inflammation (afferent nerve pathway associated with the inflammation response of a patient – [0012]). Regarding claim 3, Hamner et al disclose wherein the vagus nerve connecting branch comprises at least one of a peroneal nerve, a tibial nerve or an auricular branch of the vagus nerve ([0161]). Regarding claim 4, Hamner et al disclose wherein the second patch is applied on a lower leg of the user ([0112]; fig.6a). Regarding claim 5, Hamner et al disclose wherein the second patch is applied on or near an ear of the user (the neuromodulation device (e.g., the neurostimulator) is placed proximate the ear of the patient – [0020];[0060]). Regarding claim 6, Hamner et al disclose wherein the applying the first electrical stimuli is synchronous with the applying the second electrical stimuli (provide a synchronized continuous or patterned stimulation, and/or synchronize the timing of different stimulations – [0111];[0112]). Regarding claim 7, Hamner et al disclose after the treatment protocol, sensing a state of the inflammation; and based on the state, generating a subsequent treatment protocol comprising different intensity or duration from a previous treatment protocol (treatment could also occur at irregular intervals that are human-entered or predicted by machine learning from previous days’ voiding incidents – [0072]). Regarding claim 8, Hamner et al disclose further comprising using machine learning to sense the state of the inflammation (using machine learning these biological measures can be analyzed to serve as a predictor for inflammatory bowel disease or other inflammatory conditions – [0072];[0174]). Regarding claim 9, Hamner et al disclose wherein the sensing the state of the inflammation comprising using one or more sensors that are included on the first or second patches (the device can include at least one stimulation electrode…and at least one biomedical sensors – [0017]; receiving data from a sensor that measures a biomarker of inflammation – claim 65). Regarding claim 10, Hamner et al disclose wherein the sensing the state of inflammation comprising using one or more sensors that are separate from the first or second patches (the nerve stimulator and the sensor device can be separate devices that communicate wirelessly – [0131]; the sensor can be an electrode that measures galvanic response which can be correlated to…inflammation – [0131]). Regarding claim 11, Hamner et al disclose an inflammation treatment system comprising: a first patch adapted to be externally coupled on a dermis of a user adjacent to an afferent nerve, the first patch comprising first electrodes (second afferent peripheral nerve comprises the saphenous nerve – [0010]; stimulation of one, two, or more target nerves of interest, e.g., the saphenous, tibial median and/or vagus nerve – [0065]; a plurality of stimulator housings 6000 that can include…a patch 6002 having electrodes 6004 and a skin contacting surface – [0112]); a second patch adapted to be externally coupled on the dermis of the user adjacent to a vagus nerve or a vagus nerve connecting branch, the second patch comprising second electrodes (stimulation of one, two, or more target nerves of interest, e.g., the saphenous, tibial median and/or vagus nerve – [0065]; a plurality of stimulator housings 6000 that can include…a patch 6002 having electrodes 6004 and a skin contacting surface – [0112]); and one or more processors adapted to generate a treatment protocol during a time period comprising simultaneously apply a first electrical stimuli to the afferent nerve via the first electrodes of the first patch and applying a second electrical stimuli to the vagus nerve or the vagus nerve connecting branch via the second electrodes of the second patch (multiple stimulators may be in electrical connection with multiple electrode pairs to stimulate multiple nerves simultaneously – [0112]). Regarding claim 12, Hamner et al disclose wherein the first patch is applied on or near an occurrence of the inflammation (afferent nerve pathway associated with the inflammation response of a patient – [0012]). Regarding claim 13, Hamner et al disclose wherein the vagus nerve connecting branch comprises at least one of a peroneal nerve, a tibial nerve or an auricular branch of the vagus nerve ([0161]). Regarding claim 14, Hamner et al disclose wherein the second patch is applied on a lower leg of the user ([0112]; fig.6a). Regarding claim 15, Hamner et al disclose wherein the second patch is applied on or near an ear of the user (the neuromodulation device (e.g., the neurostimulator) is placed proximate the ear of the patient – [0020];[0060]). Regarding claim 16, Hamner et al disclose wherein the applying the first electrical stimuli is synchronous with the applying the second electrical stimuli (provide a synchronized continuous or patterned stimulation, and/or synchronize the timing of different stimulations – [0111];[0112]). Regarding claim 17, Hamner et al disclose the processor further adapted to: after the treatment protocol, sensing a state of the inflammation; and based on the state, generating a subsequent treatment protocol comprising different intensity or duration from a previous treatment protocol (treatment could also occur at irregular intervals that are human-entered or predicted by machine learning from previous days’ voiding incidents – [0072]). Regarding claim 18, Hamner et al disclose the processor further adapted to: using machine learning to sense the state of the inflammation (using machine learning these biological measures can be analyzed to serve as a predictor for inflammatory bowel disease or other inflammatory conditions – [0072];[0174]). Regarding claim 19, Hamner et al disclose wherein the sensing the state of the inflammation comprising using one or more sensors that are included on the first or second patches (the device can include at least one stimulation electrode…and at least one biomedical sensors – [0017]; receiving data from a sensor that measures a biomarker of inflammation – claim 65). Regarding claim 20, Hamner et al disclose wherein the sensing the state of inflammation comprising using one or more sensors that are separate from the first or second patches (the nerve stimulator and the sensor device can be separate devices that communicate wirelessly – [0131]; the sensor can be an electrode that measures galvanic response which can be correlated to…inflammation – [0131]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROCHELLE DEANNA TURCHEN whose telephone number is (571)270-7104. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 6:30-2:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christopher Koharski can be reached at (571)272-7230. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROCHELLE D TURCHEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3797
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 08, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12672855
PHYSIOLOGICAL INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, PHYSIOLOGICAL INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12663487
Magnetic Probe Apparatus
1y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12642433
QUANTITATIVE MEASUREMENT OF THE PERIVASCULAR SPACE FOR CNS AND BRAIN DISORDERS
4y 10m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12643125
METHOD FOR SEALING DISTAL END OF OCT CATHETER AND OCT CATHETER
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12636500
NEURAL STIMULATION DEVICE, CONTROL METHOD, AND NEURAL STIMULATION SYSTEM
2y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
57%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+29.9%)
4y 1m (~2y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 659 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month