Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 19/013,510

DISPLAY DEVICE AND DISPLAY METHOD FOR VEHICLE BEHAVIOR

Final Rejection §101§102§112
Filed
Jan 08, 2025
Priority
May 17, 2024 — JP 2024-080656
Examiner
MA, KAM WAN
Art Unit
2688
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Toyota Motor Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allowance Rate
244 granted / 388 resolved
+0.9% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
416
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
§103
53.3%
+13.3% vs TC avg
§102
18.4%
-21.6% vs TC avg
§112
21.7%
-18.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 388 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 Rejections have been removed in response to amendments. For example, claim 1 recites a display device comprising a display and a processor configured to cause the display to display a representative travel path representative of a travel path traveled by a vehicle; thus, the claim directed to a display device comprising a device and a processor, which are devices. All other limitations relate to the shape and orientation of the representative travel path do not posses any patentable weight since the recited limitation does not require the processor to generate the representative travel path based on magnitude of lateral acceleration that needed to be detected by sensor of the vehicle, for example; thus, these limitation do not constitutes abstract idea. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Rejections have been removed in response to amendments. For examination purpose, claims 1, 6 and 15 are broadly considered as a method and a display device comprising a display and a processor configured to cause the display to display a representative travel path representative of a travel path traveled by a vehicle. All other limitations relate to the shape and orientation of the representative travel path do not posses any patentable weight since the recited limitation does not require the processor to generate the representative travel path based on magnitude of lateral acceleration that needed to be detected by sensor of the vehicle, for example. Similarly, claims 2-5, 7-14 and 16-18 further limit the shape and orientation of the representative travel path do not posses any patentable weight, and they will be rejected in combination with claims 1, 6 and 15 as being a method and a display comprising a display and a processor configured to cause the display to display a representative travel path representative of a travel path traveled by a vehicle. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Okada (WO 2020100332 A1). Regarding claims 1-18, Okada discloses a method and a display device for vehicle behavior (e.g. Abstract), the display device comprising: a display (e.g. Fig. 17: 305a, 305) and a processor (e.g. Fig. 15: 304) configured to cause the display to display a representative travel path a travel path of the vehicle and/or an acceleration representation path representative of an acceleration of a vehicle along a travel path of the vehicle (e.g. Figs. 1 & 19). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 06/03/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Rejections under 35 U.S.C. 101 and 35 U.S.C. 112 have been removed in response to the amendments; however, as explained above, the amendments recite limitations directed to a display device comprising a display and a processor configured to display a representative travel path; however, the claimed invention does not require the processor to generate the representative travel path, and the claimed invention does not clearly define how the representative travel path is being generated without reciting necessary component, such as sensor for detecting/determining lateral acceleration of the vehicle. Thus, displaying the representative travel path is considered as intended use of the claimed invention (i.e. display and processor), and Okada discloses a processor that is capable of displaying any representative travel path on a display. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KAM WAN MA whose telephone number is (571) 270-3693. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Steven Lim can be reached at 571-270-1210. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KAM WAN MA/Examiner, Art Unit 2688
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 08, 2025
Application Filed
Mar 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101, §102, §112
Jun 03, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 16, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §101, §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746910
VEHICLE SYSTEMS FOR ENHANCING INGRESS AND/OR EGRESS EXPERIENCES FOR USERS
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12738135
TRACKING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12734962
VEHICLE
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12727529
VEHICLE WITH DECK ALIGNMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12728881
VEHICLE CONTROL DEVICE, VEHICLE CONTROL METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
1y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+21.7%)
2y 9m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 388 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month