Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/013,740

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING AND MANAGING A DATA INTEGRATION WORKSPACE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 08, 2025
Examiner
BULLOCK, JOSHUA
Art Unit
2153
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Palantir Technologies Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
522 granted / 634 resolved
+27.3% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
662
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
15.9%
-24.1% vs TC avg
§103
32.5%
-7.5% vs TC avg
§102
39.6%
-0.4% vs TC avg
§112
5.4%
-34.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 634 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-20 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being unpatentable over Richstein et al. (US Pub. No. 2011/0283231 A1). In respect to Claim 1, Richstein teaches: a system for creating and managing a data integration workspace, the system comprising: one or more processors; and memory storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the system to: store a dataset, and access control information corresponding to the dataset; (Richstein teaches [0024, 0033] storage of data and also storage of rules, wherein access control information are essentially rules associated with data.) generate templates based on the access control information, wherein each template indicates one or more features corresponding to different access control information; (Richstein teaches [0053] generation of filter parameters, wherein these filter parameters act as templates for accessing information.) receive feedback of a change in the access control information; (Richstein teaches [0054] updating the filters, which will result in a change in access.) selectively generate a first version and a second version of the dataset corresponding to a subset of the templates based on the change in the access control information; (Richstein teaches [0054] a first and second dataset representing a first and second version with associated access or filter criteria.) store the first version and the second version of the dataset, wherein the first version and the second version include one or more modifications to an original version of the first dataset; (Richstein teaches [0033, 0042] storage of data sets.) and cause the dataset to be replaced by the first version in response to a first input or cause the original version to be replaced by the second version in response to a second input (Richstein teaches [0054] updating the filters, which will result in a change in access.) As per Claim 2, Richstein teaches: wherein the instructions further cause the system to: generate, in a split screen format, a simultaneous visualization of the first version and the second version, of one or more models based on the first version and the second version, and programming logic used to generate the one or more models from the first version and the second version (Richstein [FIG. 5A]) As per Claim 3, Richstein teaches: wherein the instructions further cause the system to: generate a first model based on the dataset using programming logic; (Richstein [0019]) receive a modification of the programming logic; revise the first model based on the modification of the programming logic; (Richstein [0016]) and update the split screen format according to the modified programming logic (Richstein [FIG. 5B]) As per Claim 4, Richstein teaches: wherein the first input or the second input comprises or is based on one or more annotations to the dataset (Richstein teaches [0054] updating the filters, which will result in a change in access.) As per Claim 5, Richstein teaches: wherein the one or more annotations arc based on connection information indicating a connection between a model and the dataset (Richstein teaches [0054] updating the filters, which will result in a change in access.) As per Claim 6, Richstein teaches: wherein the instructions further cause the system to: receive a modification of connection information between a different dataset and the dataset; update the dataset based on the modification; and update the templates based on the modification to the dataset (Richstein teaches [0054] updating the filters, which will result in a change in access.) As per Claim 7, Richstein teaches: wherein the instructions further cause the system to: generate an updated pipeline view depicting modified connection information between the different dataset and the dataset (Richstein illustrates [FIG 5B.] an updated view based upon modifications.) Claims 8-14 are the method claims corresponding to system claims 1-7 respectively, therefore are rejected for the same reasons noted previously. Claims 15-20 are the media claims corresponding to system claims 1-6 respectively, therefore are rejected for the same reasons noted previously. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSHUA BULLOCK whose telephone number is (571)270-1395. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00 am - 4:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kavita Stanley can be reached at 571-272-8352. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSHUA BULLOCK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2153 January 1, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 08, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602401
NON-DISRUPTIVE TRANSITION TO SYNCHRONOUS REPLICATION STATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12585987
REMOTE STATISTICAL GENERATION OF GRAPHS FOR GRAPH MACHINE LEARNING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12561289
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING AND USING SHARED NATURAL LANGUAGE LIBRARIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12561294
SOFTWARE QUALITY TICKET ENRICHMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12561291
METHOD OF CLOUD STORAGE FILE SYNCHRONIZATION PRIORITIZATION FOR SELECTED USERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+16.5%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 634 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month